Castro was resilient. No question. For all you elite liberals set to wag your finger at US on Castro's accomplishments and philosophies, ask and answer the following:
- Would the so-called oppressed in the US living off welfare prefer to be poor in the US driving a 2002 model automobile in Detroit, or living among the "equal" driving around a 1958 auto in Havana?
- If Castro's programs and philosophies are so great, how come they require people to be held in country against their will?
- For all of you Liberals concerned about free speech and loving Castro, how would you like Trump to adopt Castro's practice of arresting, imprisoning, beating, and/or murdering dissidents? Look at all of the rhetoric being hurled at Trump. Think Castro would put up with that?
- On Healthcare, how come more of US are not flocking to Havana for surgery?
How come we`re not free to visit Cuba? What is our govt. afraid of?
So you think the year of car you drive is what determines whether a country is good or not?
FYI, most people "living off welfare" have jobs that pay nearly nothing.
Whatever Castro did didn`t amount to shit when compared to Batista. One of his specialties was cutting out the eyes of anyone who dared to speak for the sugar cane cutters but he was decent enough to mail the eyeballs to the dead man`s family. But Castro is bad.
Why aren`t we flocking to Havana for surgery? We don`t have that freedom...yet. Hopefully, that will be Obama`s final act in his excellent 8 years.