Grumblenuts
Gold Member
- Oct 16, 2017
- 15,426
- 5,223
- 210
Struck a nerve or three, I see. Good.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Struck a nerve or three, I see. Good.
Co-evolution. Both have similar hair cells.Why do you think the balance and cochlea are in the same organ? Some kind of coincidence?
There is a great amount of information out there about balance system disorders and cognitive functioning. I think the balance system creates thoughts and then sends them into the cochlea? just a theory. schizo voices are a side effect maybe.Co-evolution. Both have similar hair cells.
I bet those hairs would come second in 'evolution. Mainly tho you're not going to find the beginning to tell which came first, it just is.Co-evolution. Both have similar hair cells.
Dr. Wolfgang Smith provides details of experiments (starting with the 1913 Sagnac experiment) showing anisotropy in light speeds. “Ruyong Wang et al. conducted an experiment in 2003, in which the ‘Sagnac effect is also obtained on a two-way linear path, by reversing a light beam sent out on a straight line on a moving platform and measuring the difference in return time.’ What the Wang experiment indicates is that the speed of light is not in fact c in every inertial reference frame, as Einsteinian physics demands.”You mean the luminiferous aether or ether "rather than a spatial vacuum". And indeed, M&M intended to show compelling evidence for it, but their results fell short for multiple, well documented reasons where others have succeeded. Unfortunately, Wikipedia remains woefully misled and thus misleading on that score.
Smith is interesting reading. The atomists' response to "the speed of light is not in fact c in every inertial reference frame" is predictable. Define "inertial reference frame"? Bam, another whole can of worms hopelessly confuses the issue. Imo, Fractal Woman cuts through all the crap like no one else.Dr. Wolfgang Smith provides details of experiments (starting with the 1913 Sagnac experiment) showing anisotropy in light speeds. “Ruyong Wang et al. conducted an experiment in 2003, in which the ‘Sagnac effect is also obtained on a two-way linear path, by reversing a light beam sent out on a straight line on a moving platform and measuring the difference in return time.’ What the Wang experiment indicates is that the speed of light is not in fact c in every inertial reference frame, as Einsteinian physics demands.”
If the air is colder and the spin of the O2 less then the water molecule, the air will slow down the water molecule more then the water molecule speeds up the spin of the air. The water molecule remains hot in its core with electricity creating an imbalance with its core temperature and it spin? Man that was a tough write considering the insults in the vestibular. Oh well.The two Oxygen in O2 would create a magnetic field that would resist decreasing in spin more then the single Oxygen in a water molecule? The water molecule carrying the charge might release the charge when O2 overpowers the spin of the single oxygen and creates an imbalance between the aether, the ratio of spin between the water molecule's atoms, and the influence off O2?