Femto camera experiment says space is the medium for light

[trevorjohnson83]

The glue of molecular bonding releases some heat when electricity is released or absorbed, but the glue of fusion is heat that is stored like powerful electricity compared to the core pressure of atom's in the earth's core, but earths core is still similar in that there is a tremendous squeeze on the nucleus which makes it want to vibrate but can't so it absorbs heat and creates gravity?

 

[trevorjohnson83]

So the core of a smaller atom in a molecule will release some electricity as heat from its core when it bonds with a larger atom, I would assume the new core temperature of the smaller atom effects its gravity in a way that attracts or repels at boiling and melting points? Molecule's clumping together may be an attraction of how the overall magnetic field of the molecule is the exact same resistance of the occupied gravity fields of the individual atoms in the molecule's?

 

[trevorjohnson83]

If the atoms are not protected by an electron shell, but rather attracted by the EM field from the core of the nucleus all the way to physically contacting, then when they are packed together in the core they will not experience radiating power and will back up in their cores, spinning the whole planet, and keeping it hot providing a static field for gravity. I bet the core temperature could be more accurately measured by estimating the weight of the earth and how much energy is needed to spin at its rotation and consider that a fraction of the overall heat conversion.

 

[trevorjohnson83]

hmm more myrth

can you tell me how much heat you would get from focusing a large telescope like the hubble from earth so that it focus's the light from the sun?


ChatGPT

Poe
Focusing the light from the Sun using a large telescope like the Hubble would not result in any significant additional heat generation. Heat is primarily caused by absorption of light energy, and the Hubble Space Telescope is designed to observe distant astronomical objects, not to focus sunlight.

However, if we were to consider a hypothetical scenario where the Hubble telescope's optics were used to directly capture and focus sunlight, there would be some heat generated due to the concentrated solar energy. The amount of heat produced would depend on several factors, including the size and efficiency of the telescope's primary mirror, the focal length, and the duration of exposure to sunlight.

To estimate the potential heat generation, we can consider the total power received from the Sun at Earth's distance, which is approximately 1,366 watts per square meter (known as solar constant). Let's assume the Hubble telescope has a primary mirror with an effective area of 4 square meters (just for illustration purposes; the actual size of the Hubble's mirror is smaller).

If the telescope perfectly focused all the sunlight onto a target, the total power concentrated would be around 5,464 watts (1,366 watts/m² × 4 m²). However, it's important to note that no optical system is 100% efficient, and some energy would be lost due to reflections, scattering, and absorption in the telescope's optics. In reality, the actual power focused would be lower.

Nevertheless, even if we assume 100% efficiency for simplification, the heat generated would still not be significant. The primary purpose of a telescope like the Hubble is to collect and analyze the light from distant objects, not to concentrate sunlight. Therefore, the telescope's cooling systems and thermal management are not designed to handle the heat generated by focusing sunlight.

It's worth mentioning that focusing sunlight, especially with a large telescope, can be extremely dangerous and potentially damaging to both the telescope's optics and any objects in the focal plane. Directly observing the Sun without proper solar filters and safety precautions can cause severe damage to the telescope's instruments and pose risks to human observers.

In summary, while focusing the light from the Sun using a large telescope like the Hubble is not its intended use, in a hypothetical scenario, the heat generated would depend on various factors. However, in practice, it is not recommended or safe to attempt such an activity.

 

[trevorjohnson83]

is 5464 watts per second?


ChatGPT

Poe
Apologies for the confusion in my previous response. The unit of power is watts, and it does not need to be specified per second. Watts already indicate the rate of energy transfer or power per unit time.

Therefore, when I mentioned a power of 5,464 watts, it represents the total power focused by the hypothetical telescope per unit of time. So, it does not need to be converted or specified as "watts per second." The value of 5,464 watts represents the power received and focused by the telescope under the assumptions mentioned earlier.

how many watts per second would you be able to convert?


ChatGPT

Poe
As an AI language model, I don't have a physical presence or the ability to convert energy directly. Therefore, I don't have a wattage or the capability to convert watts per second.

Watts per second is not a standard unit in physics. The watt (W) is already a unit of power, which represents the rate of energy transfer per unit time. One watt is equal to one joule per second (J/s).

If you have a specific scenario or context in mind, I can try to help you with calculations or provide information related to power conversion or energy transfer.

so because it is derived from joules/second, then could the 5464 watts be converted to useful electricity or other at what rate?


ChatGPT

Poe
Converting the focused sunlight energy into useful electricity or other forms of energy would depend on the specific conversion technology and its efficiency. Different technologies can have varying efficiencies for converting solar energy into electricity.

Solar panels, for example, are commonly used to convert sunlight into electricity. The efficiency of solar panels can range from around 15% to 25% for most commercially available options. Let's assume a conservative efficiency of 15% for this example.

If we take the 5,464 watts of focused sunlight power and assume a 15% conversion efficiency, we can calculate the rate at which useful electricity could be generated:

Useful electricity = 5,464 watts × 0.15 (conversion efficiency) = 819.6 watts

So, in this hypothetical scenario, if the focused sunlight energy could be converted into useful electricity with a 15% efficiency, it would result in a rate of approximately 819.6 watts of electricity.

It's important to note that this calculation is purely hypothetical and assumes perfect concentration and conversion efficiency, which is not achievable in practice. Additionally, the Hubble Space Telescope is not designed for solar energy conversion, and attempting to focus sunlight with it would be unsafe and could damage the telescope's instruments.

819.6 watts per second would be converted?


ChatGPT

Poe
I apologize for the confusion caused by my previous response. Watts already represent a rate of energy transfer per second, so there is no need to convert it to "watts per second." Watts inherently measure power per unit time.

Therefore, if we consider the hypothetical scenario where the focused sunlight energy could be converted into useful electricity with a 15% efficiency, the rate of useful electricity generation would be approximately 819.6 watts. This means that, on average, 819.6 watts of electricity would be produced every second from the focused sunlight energy, as long as the conditions and assumptions of the scenario hold true.

 

[trevorjohnson83]

time dilation I think is when two object's like you and the earth are in direct contact with each other, you add a bit of pressure and weight onto the core heating it slightly and extending the earth's gravity field, effecting its local time dilation, and the earth does the same to the heat in the core of the atom's you are made of but to a much grander scale, so both the earth and you experience changes in relativity. If you were to travel apart from earth the gravitational bonds between your atoms would change.

 

[trevorjohnson83]

Just just using a 'flying into a sentence here' arguement but the earth with all the space removed isn't a basketball instead its already pretty close between my feet and and itself. Some of you have thought about this already and decided its the basketball?

 

[trevorjohnson83]

You
Fusion is when the aether temperature is as hot as the hydrogen core and the aether retracts the EM field all the way into the core, and a new core forms between the hydrogen atoms that is in total less hot then the two original cores. The core heat is electricity so you can see if the two nuclei are spherical, the heat is going to be cooler between rather then in the center?


ChatGPT
It seems like you're describing a conceptual model of fusion where the aether temperature, core heat (interpreted as electricity), and the electromagnetic (EM) field play crucial roles. Let's summarize the key points:

1. Fusion Conditions:
   • Fusion occurs when the aether temperature is extremely hot, reaching temperatures comparable to the hydrogen core.
2. EM Field Retraction:
   • The intense heat causes the aether to retract the EM field all the way into the core of the atoms involved.
3. New Core Formation:
   • As a result of fusion, a new core forms between the hydrogen atoms.
   • This new core is suggested to be in total less hot than the two original cores.
4. Spherical Nuclei and Heat Distribution:
   • If the nuclei are spherical, your model proposes that the heat is cooler between the nuclei than in the central region.

It's an interesting conceptualization that considers the distribution of heat/electricity and the role of the EM field in fusion processes. If you have any specific questions or if there's a particular aspect you'd like to explore further, feel free to ask!

 

[trevorjohnson83]

Assuming light travels in waves, what propels it? Its source at first? then when its no longer backed by its source the light expands and cools, but still travels the aether at light speed? Does the wave crest act on the trough to propel the wave forward?

 

[trevorjohnson83]

Magnetic fields may attract because of the direction of trough and crest of the wave that makes up the field.The northern boundary may be pushing out against the aether temperature, lead by a crest, and the southern boundary is a trough. When north overlaps south the crest to trough alignment attracts, the wavelength gets smaller closer to the magnet, pulling the two magnets together. When N over laps N the crest to crest alignment pushes the magnet apart because of the direction of compression of the wave, the trough compresses the wave outwardly from the magnet for north, expands into the aether until it can't, circles around on south where the trough compresses the wave toward the magnet? Any notions are welcome!

 

[trevorjohnson83]

This is theoretical, but in the picture belowthe compression of the wave is pointed from magnetic south towards north. This makes side A of the wave perpendicular to the arrows and side B more at an incline. This incline is the same on both sides but the wavelength's are opposite.

 

[trevorjohnson83]

Another drawing of the waves lining up, 0-5 represent temperature gradients of the field. Their proximity to each other would be what causes the compression in the field and ultimately attraction or repulsion.

 

[trevorjohnson83]

maybe by mixing steam with something the water molecules will alter their spin? Can you imagine any substance to mix with hot water to change the spin of the water molecule so it emits electricity?


ChatGPT
In theory, altering the spin of water molecules to induce electricity could involve mixing steam with certain substances that interact with the molecular structure of water. Here are a few speculative ideas:

1. Ionic Liquids: Mixing steam with specific ionic liquids could potentially influence the spin properties of water molecules. Ionic liquids are salts that exist in a liquid state at relatively low temperatures and have unique solvent properties. By introducing certain ions that interact with water molecules, it might be possible to induce changes in their spin behavior, leading to the generation of electricity.
2. Paramagnetic Materials: Incorporating paramagnetic materials into the steam-water mixture could alter the magnetic properties of water molecules and affect their spin dynamics. Paramagnetic materials are substances that become magnetized in an external magnetic field, and their interaction with water molecules could potentially modulate their spin behavior to facilitate electricity generation.
3. Piezoelectric Crystals: Introducing piezoelectric crystals into the steam-water mixture might offer a means to induce changes in water molecule spin through mechanical stress. Piezoelectric materials generate electric charge in response to mechanical pressure or deformation, and their interaction with water molecules could perturb their spin states, potentially leading to the production of electricity.
4. Magnetic Nanoparticles: Adding magnetic nanoparticles to the steam-water mixture could enable manipulation of water molecule spin through magnetic fields. These nanoparticles, when subjected to external magnetic fields, could influence the spin properties of nearby water molecules, facilitating the generation of electricity as a result of spin-induced charge separation.
5. Electron Donor Molecules: Incorporating electron donor molecules into the steam-water mixture could modify the electronic structure of water molecules and impact their spin characteristics. By facilitating electron transfer reactions or altering the distribution of charge within the water molecule, these molecules might induce changes in spin behavior conducive to electricity generation.

These ideas are speculative and would require rigorous experimentation and validation to assess their feasibility and effectiveness in practice. The complex interplay of molecular interactions and spin dynamics in water molecules presents a challenging yet intriguing avenue for exploring novel methods of electricity generation.

 

[trevorjohnson83]

perhaps the core creates a pressure field on the aether where pressure in the core creates electricity that is responsible for gravity, and spinning it creates a magnetic field on the gravity field. Paramagnetic elements of hydrogen and Oxygen are also poor conductors. Insulators I think don't spin much of their gravity field into a magnetic field, and don't spin or vibrate as quickly as conductors when aether temperature is increased.

 

[trevorjohnson83]

I thinking the electricity in the core is the aether at a dense, hot, luminous state and that electricity as we know it isn't the flow of electrons but the aether becoming very luminous along a path? I'm having trouble. It would be like the aether in the core is a larger diameter of the aether shrunk down to the size of the core, is stationary, but also singular so unlike the flow of matter? this is a tough one.

 

[trevorjohnson83]

A literal wall of galaxies

 

[trevorjohnson83]

thought I'd bring this one back since the OP still stands and there may be members whow would like to read and discuss.