Feminism Is A Scam

[Resnic]

The main purpose for feminism isn't to support women.
It was designed to get women out of the home into the working place and give your kids to the state to indoctrinate.
Feminists don't think all rape victims are equal. Biden and Clinton both committed rape, but feminists don't care about their victims. Rape, or Cancel Culture, was designed to be used against Republicans only.

Old school feminism wasn't a scam. It was so women could vote, women could get a shot at any job they want, it was so they wouldn't just been seen as housewives or secretaries, and so on.

Well, all of those things happened. Our country advanced far enough we didn't need to just be a strict separation between men and women. Men were also trapped in their roles a long time ago also, just like women were. But now our society has advanced to a point where women are equal. That happened a while ago but women refuse to admit it

Now all feminisms from the past 30 years are all just complete and utter bullshit lies and scams. Women are able to be equal, they choose not to be equal though and all of modern feminists demands are actually making them less equal because they are never satisfied with what they have.

Even since the 60s it's been bullshit. Like women burning bras and saying they were male imposed shackles despite there being no one forcing women to wear them. Well, bras still exist and women still buy them today.

In the end women don't know what they want anymore but they keep making demands anyway and that means they are easily duped.

Women have no idea how much they are being tricked by promises and lies.



Planned parenthood is a prime example of how in the 70s women were lied to and tricked and continue to be to this day. Thats why they have been fooled into blindly following the abortion thing. They innate weakness to emotion has made them easy targets.

 

[Ringo]

"The icon of American feminism, Gloria Steinem, turned out to be a CIA agent whose task was to eradicate the discussion of class struggle from the feminist movement and focus all the movement's activity on the issue of gender and only gender"

The 90-year-old leader of US feminists turned out to be a particularly valuable CIA agent, who was able to remove the topic of class struggle from the Western agenda before the difficult moment of the 70s crisis.

In light of this, it is not at all surprising that she became a co-founder of the "National Women's Political Union", which for many decades became a filter for women applying for elected and appointed positions in the US government. It is funny that it was Steinem who, by her example, showed the organization's independence from the intelligence services.

Gloria was recruited in the 1950s, after which Steinem spent two years in India as a Chester Bowles Asian Fellow, and upon returning to the United States, she was engaged in sending American students abroad to disrupt the World Youth Festivals organized by the Soviet Union. But she played her main role by going to solve the task set by the CIA to infiltrate the feminist movement and became a writer for the fashion magazine Esquire. There she did her job well - she wrote and quite successfully about women and the infringement of their rights. She needed the CIA's help only a couple of times, for example, when she interviewed John Lennon, after which she became known to a truly wide circle of American women and by 1966 had become America's leading feminist.

The lady has no children, and from a marriage that happened at 66 (she became a widow at 68), she had a stepson - the famous actor Christian Bale.

 

[whitehall]

Fifty years ago we were taught to believe that "feminism" was a political tool to assure that women achieved the same rights as men. The same politicians who were staunch advocates of feminism a half century ago are now standing by as young girls are terrorized by confused boys in skirts lurking in their showers and locker rooms and female athletes who trained all their lives for a shot at the big time are being bullied and intimidated and sometimes assaulted by fake women. WTF happened to feminism?

 

[Ringo]

One of the most popular myths about socialism is that the Soviet power allegedly supported feminism and diligently destroyed the institution of the family. The Soviet power, even in its early years, supported, not destroyed, the family.

In this post we will focus on debunking the myth about the Bolsheviks love for feminism. The attitude of the Bolsheviks to feminism was sharply negative and it was clearly expressed already in 1913. On February 17, 1913, a grandiose meeting of women workers was held in St. Petersburg, at which Praskovya Kudelli, a communist and associate of Vladimir Lenin (in the future a member of the editorial board of the magazines "Rabotnitsa", "Rabotnitsa and Peasant Woman", i.e. a major ideologist of the women's proletarian movement) made a speech in which, in particular, she called on women workers to distance themselves from feminist women's movements.

As a result of her speech, a resolution was adopted that "the worker disassociates herself from the feminists and recognizes the united revolutionary struggle of the working class, the victory of which will give her universal suffrage and full equality"

"Rabotnitsa" (Working woman) magazine for 1918 gave a curious definition of feminism "Feminists are women of the bourgeois class fighting for their equality with men within capitalist society". Note that feminists were defined precisely as women of the bourgeois, i.e. hostile, class.

The ideology of the then feminist "Women's Equality League" was called alien to the revolutionary movement by key figures of the women's proletarian movement: Alexandra Kollontai, Clara Zetkin, Vera Slutskaya, and many others.

So why did the Soviet authorities fight feminism so fiercely? The movement for equal rights for women in Soviet Russia was fundamentally different from feminism. Indeed, there was much talk at the time about the problems of women's equality and liberation "from kitchen slavery."

However, we will find nothing feminist in the Soviet calls for women's emancipation - neither ideas of the destruction of marriage nor agitation for promiscuity. Nor do we find any opposition between women and men.
Let us cite one more quotation, which will well show what exactly the Soviet fighters for equality wanted from the "bourgeois" feminists. The magazine Rabotnitsa criticized quite extensively and sharply the pre-revolutionary feminist movement "The League for Equal Rights of Women". The December 1918 issue tells of the First Women's Conference held in 1917.

The Bolsheviks led by Alexandra Kollontai responded to the calls of the feminists to "free ourselves from the slavery of men" in the following way: "We now have an equal right with our husbands, fathers, brothers and sons to work and to continue the struggle against our common enemy - capital. And it is in vain that nice young ladies come and urge to vote for a list with only women ... Women workers are not on the same path as you... The women workers will give their votes to their proletarian Bolshevik party, where men and women, both on the list and in the revolutionary struggle, are in close formation."

The opposition between women and men inherent in feminism destroys the institution of marriage and splits society. The Soviets simply didn't need this. They were going for a completely different goal. They needed to unite men and women, consolidating society in building socialism.

Women in Soviet times were largely freed from the oppression of everyday life. She was given voting rights, access to education and social realization on an equal footing with men. However, by choosing this very progressive path for its time, the Bolsheviks did not turn women into militant feminists.


So, don't go on about the leftist roots of feminism. There are none. Feminism was originally conceived by the bourgeoisie to distract the female part of the population from the class struggle and to redirect the protest towards the opposition of the sexes.