'Female Parts'-Grabber Joe's Top Communications Aide Has History of Sexist Twitter Posts

[easyt65]

JOE'S NEW WOE
READ THE TWEETS: Top Biden communications aide has history of sexist Twitter posts


'Great' misogynists think alike, I guess....

Joe Biden's head of strategic communications, Kamau M. Marshall, has repeatedly posted sexist messages on social media over the past decade, beginning with a Christmas Eve 2011 tweet in which he expressed his affection for "power women" – as long as she "know her place" and he can "where [sic] the pants."


Yup - Joe believes men should wear pants and wqomen should wear dresses / skirts - easier to grab them by the pu$$y that way, right, Joe?



Bwuhahahahahaha....

Top Biden communications aide has history of sexist Twitter posts

The social media posts are the latest example of a top Biden staffer undercutting the former vice president's public messaging.

www.foxnews.com

 

[pknopp]

If real Biden needs to demand his resignation ASAP.

 

[Sun Devil 92]

The rancid tomato named Chris Dodd to his VP selection team.

Dodd, a long term democratic sentor, is a KNOWN womanizer.

Way to go Joe.

 

[Mac-7]

I dont think anyone should lose their job over a 10-year old quote that harmed no one

 

[eagle7-31]

What does any of this have to do with Trump’s failed presidency and ongoing fuckup of the Covid19 response?

Demrats can do most anything they want and not be held accountable.

 

[pknopp]

What does any of this have to do with Trump’s failed presidency and ongoing fuckup of the Covid19 response?

A consistent message.

 

[pknopp]

I dont think anyone should lose their job over a 10-year old quote that harmed no one

It wasn't just "a" quote. It was many quotes over many years.

 

[Norman]

JOE'S NEW WOE
READ THE TWEETS: Top Biden communications aide has history of sexist Twitter posts


'Great' misogynists think alike, I guess....

Joe Biden's head of strategic communications, Kamau M. Marshall, has repeatedly posted sexist messages on social media over the past decade, beginning with a Christmas Eve 2011 tweet in which he expressed his affection for "power women" – as long as she "know her place" and he can "where [sic] the pants."


Yup - Joe believes men should wear pants and wqomen should wear dresses / skirts - easier to grab them by the pu$$y that way, right, Joe?



Bwuhahahahahaha....

Top Biden communications aide has history of sexist Twitter posts

The social media posts are the latest example of a top Biden staffer undercutting the former vice president's public messaging.

www.foxnews.com

Oh no... he cracked a joke at women.

Irrelevant. Sniffing Joe is not creepy because of "sexist" twitter posts, but because he sniffs women.

 

[Mac-7]

It wasn't just "a" quote. It was many quotes over many years.

no one objected at the time other than maybe a few womens libbers who got their feathers ruffled

 

[easyt65]

I dont think anyone should lose their job over a 10-year old quote that harmed no one

Bwuhahaha

Domestic terrorists are looting, turning, assaulting, murdering, and tearing down statues because over 100 years ago some people owned slaves in this country...

A USSC Justice almost did not get the position merely based on the LIE / FALSE CLAIM of sexual impropriety ...

But pu$$y-grabber Joe and his Twitter Perv get passes...

 

[CrusaderFrank]

What does any of this have to do with Trump’s failed presidency and ongoing fuckup of the Covid19 response?

Yeah! So what if corrupt Quid Pro Joe supports finger fuckers? Trump! RUSSIA RUSSIA RUSSIAAAAAAAAAaaaa

 

[Crixus]

JOE'S NEW WOE
READ THE TWEETS: Top Biden communications aide has history of sexist Twitter posts


'Great' misogynists think alike, I guess....

Joe Biden's head of strategic communications, Kamau M. Marshall, has repeatedly posted sexist messages on social media over the past decade, beginning with a Christmas Eve 2011 tweet in which he expressed his affection for "power women" – as long as she "know her place" and he can "where [sic] the pants."


Yup - Joe believes men should wear pants and wqomen should wear dresses / skirts - easier to grab them by the pu$$y that way, right, Joe?



Bwuhahahahahaha....

Top Biden communications aide has history of sexist Twitter posts

The social media posts are the latest example of a top Biden staffer undercutting the former vice president's public messaging.

www.foxnews.com

[/QUOTE

Shup man. That's just our Joe.

 

[pknopp]

It wasn't just "a" quote. It was many quotes over many years.

no one objected at the time other than maybe a few womens libbers who got their feathers ruffled

People didn't get upset with a policy that wouldn't allow blacks to sit at the counter either until they did.

 

[Fang]

Sounds like Kamau M. Marshall and his sexist posts fit right in with Joe "Hair Sniffer" Biden.

 

[Synthaholic]

What does any of this have to do with Trump’s failed presidency and ongoing fuckup of the Covid19 response?

Yeah! So what if corrupt Quid Pro Joe supports finger fuckers? Trump! RUSSIA RUSSIA RUSSIAAAAAAAAAaaaa

Joe who?

 

[BluesLegend]

We must believe women remember, off with his head!

 

[Mac-7]

People didn't get upset with a policy that wouldn't allow blacks to sit at the counter either until they did.

Actually a considerable number of whites objected which is why blacks can sit at the lunch counters now

 

[pknopp]

People didn't get upset with a policy that wouldn't allow blacks to sit at the counter either until they did.

Actually a considerable number of whites objected which is why blacks can sit at the lunch counters now

A minority. At least in that area. Some younger white's stood up for them. Just like you see today.

 

[Mac-7]

A minority. At least in that area. Some younger white's stood up for them. Just like you see today.

A majority of whites approved of civil rights for black people

and thats why blacks have civil rights today

 

[pknopp]

A minority. At least in that area. Some younger white's stood up for them. Just like you see today.

A majority of whites approved of civil rights for black people

and thats why blacks have civil rights today

No, that is misleading. That entirely depended on where they were at. If that was the case as you state it the laws wouldn't have been in place to start with. People wouldn't have had dogs sicced on them.