The2ndAmendment
Gold Member
- Thread starter
- #21
If you explain why 4 eyeballs that looked at each ballot and counted the same number as a machine indicates the machine counted it or reported irregularly. One can find random patterns in a subset of selected data looked at all the time.Two GIANT holes.
1. Votes were hand counted twice in GA so whatever pattern you assign to randomness is a lesson in random numbers
2. Silver bullets kill werewolves not vampires. If you can’t get even the basics right off the bat why would anyone listen to this drivel?
Ok, please explain your theory on why election results should not be beholden to the distribution of prime numbers and irreducible fractions.
Again:
Please explain your theory on why election results should not be beholden to the distribution of prime numbers and irreducible fractions?