I have tried to stay out of this debate, but I can't resist the urge any longer.
McCain might have been a fluke, but Romney was the moderate that moderates and anti social conservative members of the GOP kept pushing for...and he lost too.
socially moderate, fiscally conservative....and he got his ass handed to him worse than McCain...and Mc Cain had the handicap of following Bush AND an economic collapse.
I know you all are going to say "he had to run far right to..."
If you have to bullshit to get the nomination, you're not the guy.
The South is your base...nominating a candidate from Massachusetts is anathema to them...I'll likely catch hell for this but it's the truth...and I'm willing to catch hell for it.
And since I'm going to catch hell anyway, I'll continue with more damning truth.
I suspect that JoeB was right...I suspect that many of the religious right couldn't pull the lever for a Mormon. Sad, but likely true. If you wanted to see the effect of the loss of part of the social conservative base...I think it was here to see.
So there you have it.
Moderate, Massachusetts, Misleader.
I've tried asking Thanatos... But never really get an answer... So I'll ask you...
What was he moderate about? Which policies?
Just look at what he said in conjunction with what he did before and during his Governorship, then contrast that with what he said on the campaign trail.
In his own words:
14 Bald-Faced Mitt Romney Flip-Flops That Were Dug Up By John McCain - Business Insider
Now is it possible he was only pretending to be a moderate while governor, when he was actually severely conservative? Absolutely.
It's more likely that it's the other way around.
Romney is from Michigan, just like Bush Sr. is from Connecticut.
Bush Sr. chose to run for Governor in Texas.
That tells me he felt his positions and beliefs matched closely with the Texas electorate.
Romney chose Massachusetts, which applying the same logic, and considering Romney, like Bush, had the wherewithal to go anywhere, that decision highlights Mitts going that his positions and beliefs matched most closely with the Northeasts more moderate Republican electorate.
Make sense?