NewsVine_Mariyam
Platinum Member
- Thread starter
- #21
I fully agree with the other issues you mentioned, particularly the asset forfeiture and if you mentioned it I can safely asssumed it was because someone had a problem with some kids and their unllicensed lemonade stand <rolling eyes>Idk if I identify with Civil Libertarians politically,
You probably are and don't know it.. Because everyone thinks ACLU.. But ACLU has their "pet" civil liberty causes lately and largely ignores any economic or Bill of Rights issues they don't like..
ACLU is FULLY involved in monitoring and litigating against the "702" system abuse (702 is the Patriot Act clause that AUTHORIZES the domestic collection) So they're right on that.
But there are other important Civ Lib issues going on.. Like eminent domain abuse, asset forfeiture, govt abuse of licensing lemonade stands (LOL) and things like that. There's other Civ Lib orgs like the Institute for Justice that goes after stuff the ACLU ignores.. Like the things I just mentioned.. They are the Libertarian ACLU and do a fantastic job on the "other" Civ Lib issues...
And I actually am familair with the Institute for Justice. I receive emails from them periodically so I am on their mailing list.
Believe it or not, being spied upon is not the worse of it. The campaign to discredit an individual and write them off as nothing more than a paranoid, crazy or malicious (against the government) individual if they should happen to discover that their rights are being violated in this manner is much more heinous, in my opinion.