Federal Prosecutors subpoena trump inaugural records

[Care4all]

There is no indication that there was any impropriety with the inaugural funds. Democrats simply want to see if there is, or can they fake one up if there isn't.

Can't get a subpoena without evidence of probable cause....

The raid on Cohen's documents, phones etc produced such, along with Rick Gates cooperation, who was also a part of the inaugural committee.

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

It's the ultimate fishing expedition.

Yep, the kind where you actually catch big fish.

 

[Bootney Lee Farnsworth]

Can't get a subpoena without evidence of probable cause....

Who ******* lied to you?

 

[Bootney Lee Farnsworth]

Yep, the kind where you actually catch big fish.

I guess we'll find out.

Are you going to eat a plate full of shit if the find nothing?

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

Are you going to eat a plate full of shit if the find nothing?

Nope. But I'm not worried about that. Clearly these lying thiefs treated the inaugural fund like a personal piggy bank and used it to launder money.

 

[Bootney Lee Farnsworth]

Nope. But I'm not worried about that. Clearly these lying thiefs treated the inaugural fund like a personal piggy bank and used it to launder money.

Clearly. One wonders why they even need a subpoena to "investigate" in the first place.

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

One wonders why they even need a subpoena to "investigate" in the first place.

Then that one would be a fool, because that is how you get evidence to use in court.

 

[Lesh]

Nope. But I'm not worried about that. Clearly these lying thiefs treated the inaugural fund like a personal piggy bank and used it to launder money.

Clearly. One wonders why they even need a subpoena to "investigate" in the first place.

It's the corruption stupid

 

[Bootney Lee Farnsworth]

Then that one would be a fool, because that is how you get evidence to use in court.

Well, you're the one who said it was "clear." If so, why would they need to subpoena the records. They would already have the evidence they needed.

Just admit you are way too biased to think straight.

.

 

[Bootney Lee Farnsworth]

It's the corruption stupid

What corruption, stupid?

 

[Hutch Starskey]

Federal prosecutors subpoena Trump's inaugural committee

The pit of vipers never cease to amaze....what an open sewer this regime is....

I doubt they will get the records without raiding the Oval Office....

Criminals never give up easily.....

Yep. This should be interesting indeed.

Trump’s Inaugural Committee Paid $26 Million to Firm of First Lady’s Adviser

Trump’s Inauguration Paid Trump’s Company — With Ivanka in the Middle — ProPublica

 

[Seawytch]

There is no indication that there was any impropriety with the inaugural funds. Democrats simply want to see if there is, or can they fake one up if there isn't.

Where did the money come from and where did it all go?

 

[JimH52]

There is no indication that there was any impropriety with the inaugural funds. Democrats simply want to see if there is, or can they fake one up if there isn't.

It's the ultimate fishing expedition.

Let's see....

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

Well, you're the one who said it was "clear."

It is,to me. But that's not the evidential standard for courts. I'm sure you understand the difference, all your trolling aside.

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

There is no indication that there was any impropriety with the inaugural funds. Democrats simply want to see if there is, or can they fake one up if there isn't.

Where did the money come from and where did it all go?

Exactly. Reeks of money laundering

 

[Care4all]

Using straw donors, Saudi Arabia, and Russian oligarchs connected to Putin, donated to TRUMPs inaugural fund, which is against the law.

If there was a quid pro quo, and favors were given for those donations it breaks another law and becomes a conspiracy to defraud the United States.

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

Using straw donors, Saudi Arabia, and Russian oligarchs connected to Putin, donated to TRUMPs inaugural fund, which is against the law.

If there was a quid pro quo, and favors were given for those donations it breaks another law and becomes a conspiracy to defraud the United States.

And it will be interesting to see how a lot of the cash found its way back to the foreign entities. (Money laundering)