Federal judge blocks TX "show your papers" law

i feel sorry for the liberals. not able to remove the bill of rights form only people who don't agree with them...

Interesting spin on your part, especially since the Left is opposed to this law because it violates your Rights, too.
no spin, just saying to pretend only 1 side is doing this is just stupid.

the left currently is opposed to anything trump is for.
the "left" also doesn't give a shit about due process.
Democratic senator: 'Due process is what’s killing us right now'
the "left" also pushed for nofly lists and terror watch lists to be used to stop people from buying guns yet neither of these lists are using due process when they deny you rights.

we can do this shit all day if you want to rip into one side for trying to "take away" rights. in my mindset, the left excels at this effort. you want to say otherwise, i'll listen. but not when presented in a 1 sided fashion as if the other side is correct.

we need to address problems, not perception.

Feel free to start a thread on how the left is violating Texans' civil rights by taking their guns away from them. I will even loan you a photo of those poor oppressed Texans who have no access to guns:

if you want to think the left didn't try then you chose to ignore the senator saying due process was stopping them from doing just that.

like you say - you wanna be ignorant, up to you.
I see you are falling for the NRA recruiting trick.

The NRA doesn't recruit.
 
The Constitution Moron, covers US Citizens. Why in the **** do you think DIPLOMATS are covered under an entirely different system of laws governing Non Citizens? Diplomats can have diplomatic immunity. US CODE does not apply to them, unless they bring themselves under it's jurisdiction by Violating US Code. Same goes with Illegals. Lord you are stupid.

Diplomats and Illegals can be expelled from THE US without just cause or Due Process....period. THEY ARE GUESTS, SOME UNWELCOME AND ILLEGAL, and SOME SANCTIONED.

******* Liberals are ALL RETARDED?

DID OBAMA HAVE A ******* TRIAL FOR THE RUSSIAN DIPLOMATS WHEN HE UNJUSTLY EXPELLED THEM FOR A POLITICAL DOG AND PONY SHOW?

WTF?

Well, then I am OK, then. I am the ambassador from Elbonia. You may not believe that, so what is your plan to find out if my claim is true or not?
You have to register as a Diplomat DUMMY, and carry your Diplomatic Papers, IDIOT, and YES, LAW ENFORCEMENT can ask you to show them.

If you don't have them, guess what happens to you, in the US, or in any other country?

Did you double your dose of stupid pills today?
 
Interesting spin on your part, especially since the Left is opposed to this law because it violates your Rights, too.
no spin, just saying to pretend only 1 side is doing this is just stupid.

the left currently is opposed to anything trump is for.
the "left" also doesn't give a shit about due process.
Democratic senator: 'Due process is what’s killing us right now'
the "left" also pushed for nofly lists and terror watch lists to be used to stop people from buying guns yet neither of these lists are using due process when they deny you rights.

we can do this shit all day if you want to rip into one side for trying to "take away" rights. in my mindset, the left excels at this effort. you want to say otherwise, i'll listen. but not when presented in a 1 sided fashion as if the other side is correct.

we need to address problems, not perception.

Feel free to start a thread on how the left is violating Texans' civil rights by taking their guns away from them. I will even loan you a photo of those poor oppressed Texans who have no access to guns:

if you want to think the left didn't try then you chose to ignore the senator saying due process was stopping them from doing just that.

like you say - you wanna be ignorant, up to you.
I see you are falling for the NRA recruiting trick.

The NRA doesn't recruit.

:lmao::lmao::lmao::lmao::lmao::lmao::lmao::lmao::lmao::lmao::lmao::lmao::lmao::lmao::lmao:
 
The Constitution Moron, covers US Citizens. Why in the **** do you think DIPLOMATS are covered under an entirely different system of laws governing Non Citizens? Diplomats can have diplomatic immunity. US CODE does not apply to them, unless they bring themselves under it's jurisdiction by Violating US Code. Same goes with Illegals. Lord you are stupid.

Diplomats and Illegals can be expelled from THE US without just cause or Due Process....period. THEY ARE GUESTS, SOME UNWELCOME AND ILLEGAL, and SOME SANCTIONED.

******* Liberals are ALL RETARDED?

DID OBAMA HAVE A ******* TRIAL FOR THE RUSSIAN DIPLOMATS WHEN HE UNJUSTLY EXPELLED THEM FOR A POLITICAL DOG AND PONY SHOW?

WTF?

Well, then I am OK, then. I am the ambassador from Elbonia. You may not believe that, so what is your plan to find out if my claim is true or not?
You have to register as a Diplomat DUMMY, and carry your Diplomatic Papers, IDIOT, and YES, LAW ENFORCEMENT can ask you to show them.

If you don't have them, guess what happens to you, in the US, or in any other country?

Did you double your dose of stupid pills today?

...and you think that some police officer can make the final decision on that, and that a judge is not required?
 
The Constitution Moron, covers US Citizens. Why in the **** do you think DIPLOMATS are covered under an entirely different system of laws governing Non Citizens? Diplomats can have diplomatic immunity. US CODE does not apply to them, unless they bring themselves under it's jurisdiction by Violating US Code. Same goes with Illegals. Lord you are stupid.

Diplomats and Illegals can be expelled from THE US without just cause or Due Process....period. THEY ARE GUESTS, SOME UNWELCOME AND ILLEGAL, and SOME SANCTIONED.

******* Liberals are ALL RETARDED?

DID OBAMA HAVE A ******* TRIAL FOR THE RUSSIAN DIPLOMATS WHEN HE UNJUSTLY EXPELLED THEM FOR A POLITICAL DOG AND PONY SHOW?

No, he said Get Out, and they had to go as they had NO LEGAL RECOURSE and DUE PROCESS is not required to expel them or an ILLEGAL.

WTF?
obama did it - so it's ok.

you really need to learn the rules.
 
Federal judge blocks Texas' tough 'sanctuary cities' law

I feel sorry for the Texas legislature, having had a setback in their efforts to dismantle the Bill of Rights of the US constitution....

I have to show my papers if I get pulled over... not sure what your point is exactly.

So, you think that if your wife is pulled over fro speeding, and you are a passenger, that you have to show your ID?

Nope.

It depends. They have the right to request the ID of everyone in the car if they have reasonable suspicion.
 
Federal judge blocks Texas' tough 'sanctuary cities' law

I feel sorry for the Texas legislature, having had a setback in their efforts to dismantle the Bill of Rights of the US constitution....

I have to show my papers if I get pulled over... not sure what your point is exactly.

So, you think that if your wife is pulled over fro speeding, and you are a passenger, that you have to show your ID?

Nope.
Actually you do. Nearly All states have laws which require you to show legal identification upon request of Law Enforcement.

Yes, Police Can Arrest You for Failing to Identify Yourself
 
For the first time in American history, we are witnessing an all out denial of opposition through obstruction.

The Left has no intention of ever allowing bi-partisan government. The Right is still under the Left's spell of mass & public shaming.
The reason shaming doesn't work on the Left is that for the most part, their narcissistic nature is immune to morality and conscious.

If the Right continues to passively accept it.....we are deserving of the chains they are placing on our wrists and the noose they are placing around our necks.

And BTW...arguing on forums without action off the forums is accepting the noose.....

i can not argue with that. We WILL resist the RW agenda to repeal the Bill of Rights.
You dummy, It's The Bill of Rights that INSIST we have IMMIGRATION LAW and DEFINE CITIZENSHIP.

It's you assholes who are trying to SHRED IT.

THE BILL OF RIGHTS ARE RIGHTS FOR CITIZENS, NOT RIGHTS FOR ILLEGALS.
Show us which part of the Bill of Rights insists that we have immigration law and define citizenship.

Is it Amendment 1?
Is it Amendment 2?
Is it Amendment 3?
Is it Amendment 4?
Is it Amendment 5?
Is it Amendment 6?
Is it Amendment 7?
Is it Amendment 8?
Is it Amendment 9?
or
Is it Amendment 10?
 
BTW, folks, you don't have to cooperate at a DUI checkpoint unless they have probable cause, either:

 
Interesting spin on your part, especially since the Left is opposed to this law because it violates your Rights, too.
no spin, just saying to pretend only 1 side is doing this is just stupid.

the left currently is opposed to anything trump is for.
the "left" also doesn't give a shit about due process.
Democratic senator: 'Due process is what’s killing us right now'
the "left" also pushed for nofly lists and terror watch lists to be used to stop people from buying guns yet neither of these lists are using due process when they deny you rights.

we can do this shit all day if you want to rip into one side for trying to "take away" rights. in my mindset, the left excels at this effort. you want to say otherwise, i'll listen. but not when presented in a 1 sided fashion as if the other side is correct.

we need to address problems, not perception.

Feel free to start a thread on how the left is violating Texans' civil rights by taking their guns away from them. I will even loan you a photo of those poor oppressed Texans who have no access to guns:

if you want to think the left didn't try then you chose to ignore the senator saying due process was stopping them from doing just that.

like you say - you wanna be ignorant, up to you.
I see you are falling for the NRA recruiting trick.

The NRA doesn't recruit.
:lol: :lol: :lol: That's funny!
 
The Constitution Moron, covers US Citizens. Why in the **** do you think DIPLOMATS are covered under an entirely different system of laws governing Non Citizens? Diplomats can have diplomatic immunity. US CODE does not apply to them, unless they bring themselves under it's jurisdiction by Violating US Code. Same goes with Illegals. Lord you are stupid.

Diplomats and Illegals can be expelled from THE US without just cause or Due Process....period. THEY ARE GUESTS, SOME UNWELCOME AND ILLEGAL, and SOME SANCTIONED.

******* Liberals are ALL RETARDED?

DID OBAMA HAVE A ******* TRIAL FOR THE RUSSIAN DIPLOMATS WHEN HE UNJUSTLY EXPELLED THEM FOR A POLITICAL DOG AND PONY SHOW?

WTF?

Well, then I am OK, then. I am the ambassador from Elbonia. You may not believe that, so what is your plan to find out if my claim is true or not?
You have to register as a Diplomat DUMMY, and carry your Diplomatic Papers, IDIOT, and YES, LAW ENFORCEMENT can ask you to show them.

If you don't have them, guess what happens to you, in the US, or in any other country?

Did you double your dose of stupid pills today?

...and you think that some police officer can make the final decision on that, and that a judge is not required?
I not only think he CAN make that Final Decision, I as a VOTER have granted him that authority as a representative of THE PEOPLE charged with the Duty of Serving and Protecting Citizens, Their Rights, Their Person, and Their Property to make that decision.

If you do not have your diplomatic papers law enforcement can immediately detain you, same as if you don't have immigration papers.
 
Last edited:
The Constitution Moron, covers US Citizens. Why in the **** do you think DIPLOMATS are covered under an entirely different system of laws governing Non Citizens? Diplomats can have diplomatic immunity. US CODE does not apply to them, unless they bring themselves under it's jurisdiction by Violating US Code. Same goes with Illegals. Lord you are stupid.

Diplomats and Illegals can be expelled from THE US without just cause or Due Process....period. THEY ARE GUESTS, SOME UNWELCOME AND ILLEGAL, and SOME SANCTIONED.

******* Liberals are ALL RETARDED?

DID OBAMA HAVE A ******* TRIAL FOR THE RUSSIAN DIPLOMATS WHEN HE UNJUSTLY EXPELLED THEM FOR A POLITICAL DOG AND PONY SHOW?

WTF?

Well, then I am OK, then. I am the ambassador from Elbonia. You may not believe that, so what is your plan to find out if my claim is true or not?
You have to register as a Diplomat DUMMY, and carry your Diplomatic Papers, IDIOT, and YES, LAW ENFORCEMENT can ask you to show them.

If you don't have them, guess what happens to you, in the US, or in any other country?

Did you double your dose of stupid pills today?
Yes...because if a diplomat doesn't have his papers showing his diplomatic immunity, guess what? He gets treated like the REST OF US.
 
For the first time in American history, we are witnessing an all out denial of opposition through obstruction.

The Left has no intention of ever allowing bi-partisan government. The Right is still under the Left's spell of mass & public shaming.
The reason shaming doesn't work on the Left is that for the most part, their narcissistic nature is immune to morality and conscious.

If the Right continues to passively accept it.....we are deserving of the chains they are placing on our wrists and the noose they are placing around our necks.

And BTW...arguing on forums without action off the forums is accepting the noose.....

i can not argue with that. We WILL resist the RW agenda to repeal the Bill of Rights.
You dummy, It's The Bill of Rights that INSIST we have IMMIGRATION LAW and DEFINE CITIZENSHIP.

It's you assholes who are trying to SHRED IT.

THE BILL OF RIGHTS ARE RIGHTS FOR CITIZENS, NOT RIGHTS FOR ILLEGALS.
Show us which part of the Bill of Rights insists that we have immigration law and define citizenship.

Is it Amendment 1?
Is it Amendment 2?
Is it Amendment 3?
Is it Amendment 4?
Is it Amendment 5?
Is it Amendment 6?
Is it Amendment 7?
Is it Amendment 8?
Is it Amendment 9?
or
Is it Amendment 10?

It is nowhere in the Bill of Rights.
 
BTW, folks, you don't have to cooperate at a DUI checkpoint unless they have probable cause, either:


Actually you can be arrested at a DUI checkpoint for being an asshole. I urge all liberals to refuse to comply with any directives a law enforcement officer may give them at a checkpoint. Maybe 1 out of 10 if they are polite enough and not drunk and the officer doesn't feel like dealing with the little shit, may be let go without a fine or being arrested for obstructing official business.
 
15th post
For the first time in American history, we are witnessing an all out denial of opposition through obstruction.

The Left has no intention of ever allowing bi-partisan government. The Right is still under the Left's spell of mass & public shaming.
The reason shaming doesn't work on the Left is that for the most part, their narcissistic nature is immune to morality and conscious.

If the Right continues to passively accept it.....we are deserving of the chains they are placing on our wrists and the noose they are placing around our necks.

And BTW...arguing on forums without action off the forums is accepting the noose.....

i can not argue with that. We WILL resist the RW agenda to repeal the Bill of Rights.
You dummy, It's The Bill of Rights that INSIST we have IMMIGRATION LAW and DEFINE CITIZENSHIP.

It's you assholes who are trying to SHRED IT.

THE BILL OF RIGHTS ARE RIGHTS FOR CITIZENS, NOT RIGHTS FOR ILLEGALS.
Show us which part of the Bill of Rights insists that we have immigration law and define citizenship.

Is it Amendment 1?
Is it Amendment 2?
Is it Amendment 3?
Is it Amendment 4?
Is it Amendment 5?
Is it Amendment 6?
Is it Amendment 7?
Is it Amendment 8?
Is it Amendment 9?
or
Is it Amendment 10?

It is nowhere in the Bill of Rights.
Exactly....tho The Original Tree claims it is.
 
BTW, folks, you don't have to cooperate at a DUI checkpoint unless they have probable cause, either:


Actually you can be arrested at a DUI checkpoint for being an asshole. I urge all liberals to refuse to comply with any directives a law enforcement officer may give them at a checkpoint. Maybe 1 out of 10 if they are polite enough and not drunk and the officer doesn't feel like dealing with the little shit, may be let go without a fine for obstructing official business.

Define "being an asshole" at a DUI checkpoint. What is the law one is arrested under?
 
Federal judge blocks Texas' tough 'sanctuary cities' law

I feel sorry for the Texas legislature, having had a setback in their efforts to dismantle the Bill of Rights of the US constitution....


I missed the part in the constitution that says no one has to prove citizenship. Matter of fact, some states require one to posses an ID. This judge will be overruled as they typically are by the supreme court. All in all, this judge did nothing but get a blerb on Fox News. I doubt highly when the law go's back into effect the op will create a thread pointing it out.
 
Federal judge blocks Texas' tough 'sanctuary cities' law

I feel sorry for the Texas legislature, having had a setback in their efforts to dismantle the Bill of Rights of the US constitution....


I missed the part in the constitution that says no one has to prove citizenship. Matter of fact, some states require one to posses an ID. This judge will be overruled as they typically are by the supreme court. All in all, this judge did nothing but get a blerb on Fox News. I doubt highly when the law go's back into effect the op will create a thread pointing it out.
So you are in the "An America where everyone has to prove they are here legally" school.
 

New Topics

Back
Top Bottom