Federal Judge Allows Lawsuit Against Rittenhouse To Proceed

the preponderance of the evidence shows a justifiable shooting in self defense.

Its a wrongful death suit. All that has to be shown, is the deceased would not have been killed, but for the fact Rittenhouse took it upon himself to leave his home, and cross a state line injecting himself into a scenario of which he should have not been present. Plus, the additional evidence of a 17 year old in possession of an AR15, which no state in the country allows, and with no proof of direct supervision of an adult, including the fact he was in violation of a curfew order.

The case against him is pretty airtight in a civil case where the preponderance of the evidence is all that needs be shown.
 
Its a wrongful death suit. All that has to be shown, is the deceased would not have been killed, but for the fact Rittenhouse took it upon himself to leave his home, and cross a state line injecting himself into a scenario of which he should have not been present. Plus, the additional evidence of a 17 year old in possession of an AR15, which no state in the country allows, and with no proof of direct supervision of an adult, including the fact he was in violation of a curfew order.

The case against him is pretty airtight in a civil case where the preponderance of the evidence is all that needs be shown.
Did Rittenhouse work in Kenosha?
 
MADISON, Wis. (AP) — A federal judge in Wisconsin on Wednesday ruled that a wrongful death lawsuit filed by the father of a man shot and killed by Kyle Rittenhouse during a protest in 2020 can proceed against Rittenhouse, police officers and others.

U.S. District Judge Lynn Adelman on Wednesday dismissed motions filed by Rittenhouse and the government defendants seeking to dismiss the civil rights lawsuit.


No worries. There will be somebody to take responsibility for any judgement against you son.
Not to be lost on the current woke mindset by leftists.
To never let well enough alone.Like say how leftists managed to sell
Same Sex Marriage.But that wasn't current enough.Now We the People
are forced to swallow Gay Pride.In all it's abstract ridiculousness.
Gay Pride this and Gay pride that.Now it's onto the new Woke flavor of
the week,Month,year as in Trans Gender Pride.Anyone not accepting
Trans Gender anything or especially Gay Pride anything is now deemed
{ especially by Leftist female as this Judgy Wudgy surely is } to be
Racist or a Hater.Like the progressive norm that Blacks are inherently
incapable of being Racist.So therefore these 5 Blacks cops from Memphis are
now White Racist { no matter Not White }.
Just making up crap out of thin air.So naturally it's as natural as
Mom and Apple pie in the 50's that a Federal Judge from Wisconsin
uses her power as if a Wand used by a Good witch in :
- The Wizard of Oz -. Only NOT for good.
Same abstract gobbledegook.
Where Good intentions are { like the very reason Kyle Rittenhouse
volunteered his time to help a business owner not have his business
burned down } to be transgressed by a group of Troublemaking
Protesters out to break stuff and cause conflict.
Then when the Young Kid { Rittenhouse } merely attempts to
keep his person from harm { or death } he is attacked by Leftism.
As our Mainstream Media is a pack of pathetic leftists.
Taking the side of wrong.The overriding rule being :
- The left does not Value TRUTH -.
 
All that has to be shown, is the deceased would not have been killed
The attempted murderer piece of shit Anthony Huber would not have been killed if he wasn’t Antifa filth showing up at a riot to burn and destroy and joined a lynch mob to kill an innocent teenager

The attempted murderer piece of shit Anthony Huber would not have been killed if he had not attacked an innocent kid like a stupid, stupid savage.
 
You are so ruled by fear that you probably think being scared all the time is normal. The entire Kyle thing was a shameful display of false bravado and pants pissing fear.
Blah blah blah blah blah. Thumbsucker.
 
Its a wrongful death suit. All that has to be shown, is the deceased would not have been killed, but for the fact Rittenhouse took it upon himself to leave his home, and cross a state line injecting himself into a scenario of which he should have not been present. Plus, the additional evidence of a 17 year old in possession of an AR15, which no state in the country allows, and with no proof of direct supervision of an adult, including the fact he was in violation of a curfew order.

The case against him is pretty airtight in a civil case where the preponderance of the evidence is all that needs be shown.
Waah waah waah
 
Kyle has been woken. Woken up to the fact that like O.J. Simpson, he is open to civil suits, where the rules in court are different





View attachment 752833
haha this will go nowhere.....you can't try and kill someone, and get killed youself in self-defense and then try to collect. The major difference in OJ's case was he claimed he didn't do it. Rittenhouse never did, he successfully used self-defense...hard to claim the death was wrongful, when the jury already said it was justified.
 
You are so ruled by fear that you probably think being scared all the time is normal. The entire Kyle thing was a shameful display of false bravado and pants pissing fear.

You must be a Dr Phil fan. His show yesterday was EXACTLY that. Saying that people that love guns own them out of fear.

I've been shot 6 times by a felon negro looking for drug money. Yes, I own guns out of fear and won't hesitate to kill out of same.
 
I don't expect you to understand. Trying to describe courage to one such as you is like explaining color to a blind man.
I understand perfectly. You're just butthurt that people are standing up to you filthy trash.
 
Its a wrongful death suit. All that has to be shown, is the deceased would not have been killed, but for the fact Rittenhouse took it upon himself to leave his home, and cross a state line injecting himself into a scenario of which he should have not been present. Plus, the additional evidence of a 17 year old in possession of an AR15, which no state in the country allows, and with no proof of direct supervision of an adult, including the fact he was in violation of a curfew order.

The case against him is pretty airtight in a civil case where the preponderance of the evidence is all that needs be shown.
All that has to be shown is that those scumbags would still be alive if they didn't attack Rittenhouse.
 

Forum List

Back
Top