He might not be.You failed to mention if he didn't have a gun they would be alive.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
He might not be.You failed to mention if he didn't have a gun they would be alive.
the preponderance of the evidence shows a justifiable shooting in self defense.
Did Rittenhouse work in Kenosha?Its a wrongful death suit. All that has to be shown, is the deceased would not have been killed, but for the fact Rittenhouse took it upon himself to leave his home, and cross a state line injecting himself into a scenario of which he should have not been present. Plus, the additional evidence of a 17 year old in possession of an AR15, which no state in the country allows, and with no proof of direct supervision of an adult, including the fact he was in violation of a curfew order.
The case against him is pretty airtight in a civil case where the preponderance of the evidence is all that needs be shown.
You are so ruled by fear that you probably think being scared all the time is normal. The entire Kyle thing was a shameful display of false bravado and pants pissing fear.Now you're lying. Lying is common to your tribe.
Not to be lost on the current woke mindset by leftists.MADISON, Wis. (AP) — A federal judge in Wisconsin on Wednesday ruled that a wrongful death lawsuit filed by the father of a man shot and killed by Kyle Rittenhouse during a protest in 2020 can proceed against Rittenhouse, police officers and others.
U.S. District Judge Lynn Adelman on Wednesday dismissed motions filed by Rittenhouse and the government defendants seeking to dismiss the civil rights lawsuit.
MSN
www.msn.com
No worries. There will be somebody to take responsibility for any judgement against you son.
The attempted murderer piece of shit Anthony Huber would not have been killed if he wasn’t Antifa filth showing up at a riot to burn and destroy and joined a lynch mob to kill an innocent teenagerAll that has to be shown, is the deceased would not have been killed
Blah blah blah blah blah. Thumbsucker.You are so ruled by fear that you probably think being scared all the time is normal. The entire Kyle thing was a shameful display of false bravado and pants pissing fear.
Actually they went after a dude with a rifle with fists and a scateboard. That's not cowardly.The cowards got what they deserved. Kyle Rittenhouse took care of that. Go buy some flowers for their graves.
Waah waah waahIts a wrongful death suit. All that has to be shown, is the deceased would not have been killed, but for the fact Rittenhouse took it upon himself to leave his home, and cross a state line injecting himself into a scenario of which he should have not been present. Plus, the additional evidence of a 17 year old in possession of an AR15, which no state in the country allows, and with no proof of direct supervision of an adult, including the fact he was in violation of a curfew order.
The case against him is pretty airtight in a civil case where the preponderance of the evidence is all that needs be shown.
haha this will go nowhere.....you can't try and kill someone, and get killed youself in self-defense and then try to collect. The major difference in OJ's case was he claimed he didn't do it. Rittenhouse never did, he successfully used self-defense...hard to claim the death was wrongful, when the jury already said it was justified.Kyle has been woken. Woken up to the fact that like O.J. Simpson, he is open to civil suits, where the rules in court are different
View attachment 752833
You missed the guy who pointed a rifle at Rittenhouse.Actually they went after a dude with a rifle with fists and a scateboard. That's not cowardly.
I don't expect you to understand. Trying to describe courage to one such as you is like explaining color to a blind man.Blah blah blah blah blah. Thumbsucker.
You are so ruled by fear that you probably think being scared all the time is normal. The entire Kyle thing was a shameful display of false bravado and pants pissing fear.
None of them had a rifle.You missed the guy who pointed a rifle at Rittenhouse.
Two of the five known and identified attackers did have guns though.None of them had a rifle.
A handgun, others tried to grab his rifle.None of them had a rifle.
I understand perfectly. You're just butthurt that people are standing up to you filthy trash.I don't expect you to understand. Trying to describe courage to one such as you is like explaining color to a blind man.
Bullshit. You better do some research. The punk who lived pointed a gun at Rittenhouse. Semantics. You run with that.None of them had a rifle.
All that has to be shown is that those scumbags would still be alive if they didn't attack Rittenhouse.Its a wrongful death suit. All that has to be shown, is the deceased would not have been killed, but for the fact Rittenhouse took it upon himself to leave his home, and cross a state line injecting himself into a scenario of which he should have not been present. Plus, the additional evidence of a 17 year old in possession of an AR15, which no state in the country allows, and with no proof of direct supervision of an adult, including the fact he was in violation of a curfew order.
The case against him is pretty airtight in a civil case where the preponderance of the evidence is all that needs be shown.