- Jan 19, 2010
- 67,573
- 61,797
- 3,605
Maybe just maybe we will see Biden brought to justice for this kind of shit.....
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
Free speech cannot legally be censored/silenced in POMPS with a few obvious exceptions.It’s not irrelevant at all. It’s the fundamental difference between private and public property.
See above.You and Texas seek to make Twitter a public space.
See above.You can’t do that.
See above.Not without Twitter’s consent or providing compensation in accordance with the 5th amendment.
See above.Twitter isn’t public property and Texas can’t wave a magic wand making it so.
I hope you some day grasp the issues at play here.You have to actually supply something to reply to.
I hope you some day grasp the issues at play here.
One can only hope.Federal court rules Big Tech has no 'freewheeling First Amendment right to censor'
A federal appeals court upheld a Texas law on Friday that seeks to curb censorship by social media platforms -- a major victory for Republicans who charge companies like Twitter and Facebook are limiting free speech.www.foxnews.com
The justice bug is starting to catch up to big tech... they played with the big dogs of the democrat party and are getting burned.....
META (Facebook) Banning Conservatives over their opinions.....Maybe some day you can explain it.
^ Projection.What a scummy little brat you have turned into.
Another lie to hide that I eviscerated you.
Well, censoring/silencing free speech in POMPS is a bad idea with a few obvious exceptions.We may see the end of twitter and facebook in our lifetime... I wonder if they will know what happened to them and why.... you can't take political sides as a company in the USA without taking a risk.....
^ Projection.
And your concession is noted.
Were you in a WalMart POMPS at the time?Wal Mart banned me for wearing a billboard saying "Shop Target better prices".
Your comment makes no sense, but see above.Not really but Wal Mart not allowing that is what you are arguing.
^ Trolling without content.Earlier, I explained what an Elmer is....
....one poster, Elmer, came up with this knee-jerk post from one of the indoctrinated:
“ There were hundreds if not thousands of people who lost jobs, careers, even families based on McCarty's (sic) over reach and list he compiled and interrogated. Innocent people.”
Yea Or Nay?
One hears this time and again from the indoctrinated....
If this is true…..it should be eminently simple to prove.
When challenged, he could not name a single such innocent ruined by McCarthy......yet he doubled down with his lies, continuing to blame McCarthy.
And now you....when given documentation that refutes your post, the same.
Another Elmer.
Were you in a WalMart POMPS at the time?
If so, you might have a case against them.
No exception needed since social media websites don’t qualify under this definition.Free speech cannot legally be censored/silenced in POMPS with a few obvious exceptions.
Were you in a WalMart POMPS?No I wouldn't, but you know that.
See this thread:No exception needed since social media websites don’t qualify under this definition.
It’s a thread where you make the exact same unsupported argument.See this thread:
META (Facebook) Banning Conservatives over their opinions.....
Good luck in better grasping the issues!
^ TWCGet lost, Elmer.