META (Facebook) Banning Conservatives over their opinions.....

Billy_Bob

Diamond Member
Sep 4, 2014
30,837
20,604
1,945
Top Of The Great Divide
It looks like Mark Zuckerberg has ordered his troops to remove any conservative who is making their opinion heard and are getting the word out well.

A group of some 18 Wyoming conservatives, who were exposing the Cheney lies and were being successful at getting the word out about her denial of due process and support of red flag laws which deny due process have been banned from face book. Facebook took actions based on their "community standards" but then failed to state why they banned these people. Funny how they still allow Death to America from many here.

In my case, we had just begun to go after the 87,000 IRS agents that are most certainly Bidens Secret Police. The Posse Comitatus Act stops the government from using military troops against the people. As IRS agents they are free to go after the people. They have bought millions of dollars in ammunition and weapons and there recent job posting mentioned using deadly force against We the People..

I posted this on Facebook:
1660925121486.png

META has now banned 18 conservatives in our group for comments like this. We were successful in helping stop Liz Cheney's re-election and now we set our sights on Democrats as a whole. Because they do not like the linkage to a fascist organization and how they were set up in the 1930's by another dictator, they are banning people who see these fascists for what they are. Face Book is now protecting fascism in the US.

We live in perilous times and we as Good Men and Women must stand up or we will lose our freedoms forever. Facebook is giving democrats donations in kind for active censorship of opposing views.

Feel free to post your experiences with Facebook or as I call them FASCISTBOOK. They are hard and fast removing any content damaging to democrat politicians.
 
If you do not like the free service they provide, do not use them.

It seems so simple yet you all just cannot figure it out.

Why is that?
ITs called the freedom to associate with those with like opinions. You all don't like our opinions. We have the right to be there as well, so your answer is not to debate them but to silence them... Why is that? Are your positions so weak that you cannot defend them?
 
Actually they keep the "open platform" bullshit in their TOS and use vague rules to allow them to basically ban you as they see fit, while pretending to be "free speech champions"
Deception at its finest... Thier "opinion" is more valuable, and others must be silenced. Zuckerberg even said so openly in court. All of their fact checking is OPINON. Which means they have no legal standing to ban anyone. It is all about political narrative.
 
Actually they keep the "open platform" bullshit in their TOS and use vague rules to allow them to basically ban you as they see fit, while pretending to be "free speech champions"
Thier "non-partisan" governance board is a joke. They can pick and choose what they want to respond to. Constitutional issues they avoid like the plague, so the banning stands every time. And if you look into those on the board, they are all far left-wing socialists. It is NOT representative of the Town Square with varying opinions.

Out of the 18 people I know that have been banned, not one of them has been chosen to look at the Constitutional issues we presented.
 
If you do not like the free service they provide, do not use them.

It seems so simple yet you all just cannot figure it out.

Why is that?
No, I would agree with those who say social media --- the biggest --- are now basically a public utility. After all, telephones weren't a public utility until suddenly they were, and that's about communication too. Same deal as telephones. I would like to see no political censoring; I don't like porn or openly inciting violence to individuals or sales talks --- so I guess I'm not for TOTALLY free speech, but political, even over-the-top stuff, yeah.
 
Social Media is the new Town Square where Speech is protected. Why has no one stood up to defend it? And now that I am trying to stand up for it, All I am getting is silence from those who are pushing their fascist agenda.
 
No, I would agree with those who say social media --- the biggest --- are now basically a public utility. After all, telephones weren't a public utility until suddenly they were, and that's about communication too. Same deal as telephones. I would like to see no political censoring; I don't like porn or openly inciting violence to individuals or sales talks --- so I guess I'm not for TOTALLY free speech, but political, even over-the-top stuff, yeah.
I would take it a step further as they have become the defacto "Town Square". It is now a public space.
 

Forum List

Back
Top