* Fed. Judges Come Crashing Down*

[Marener]

If constituents in his district are affected by the ruling, yes. In this case, none of those affected came from that district--nor were they constituents of any district in the US. Illegal aliens.

The lawsuit is against Trump. Trump lives in DC.

 

[Concerned American]

The lawsuit is against Trump. Trump lives in DC.

LMAO. Wrong on many levels, most notable is Trump is a FL resident.

 

[BULLDOG]

The USSC also said "NO" and Biden did it anyway. So stop whining.

They said he couldn't do it in that specific form. He modified the program to a form that was acceptable to the SC.

 

[Marener]

LMAO. Wrong on many levels, most notable is Trump is a FL resident.

Oh. You’re a moron. I see.

 

[Marener]

The democrats "judge shop" to find like minded District Judges.

Filing the lawsuit in DC is hardly judge shopping.

It’s not like Trump and Musk who love suing in random districts in Texas.

 

[Concerned American]

Oh. You’re a moron. I see.

Typical democrat response.

 

[toobfreak]

Obviously you don't understand what history I'm talking about.

There is only one history, rube. History is history. But predictably,. you left that open as a backdoor for getting out of defending your comment otherwise you would have stated which /specific/ history you were referring in either of your two chances of doing so. At least that is what any intelligent, educated person would have done.

Next up: you will assign me the blame for not being able to read your mind.

Just like a book.

 

[22lcidw]

Yep, get rid of anyone who can hold Trump accountable.

Following the template of history.

Unfortunately, no one holds the Progressive Socialist Communists accountable. Imagine if Trump was the polar opposite of the Progressives. 50 million women today would be wearing the "handmaid tales" uniforms. As just a speck of it. You are George Wallace. You are Jim Crow. You are the KKK, and the Nazis. Just in different form. For you to survive people have to pay much more for person as you promote anything goes calling it freedom and our culture suffers for it. You stole so much that our fiat currency is starting to suffer, and inflation comes easier now from overprinting.

 

[gmeyers1944]

Is that what you think they’re doing?

It is what these judges are doing!

 

[BluesLegend]

Democrats falling on their swords of ILLEGALS, I say let them. Their shit party is circling the drain.

 

[Edgetho]

Democrats falling on their swords of ILLEGALS, I say let them. Their shit party is circling the drain.

Meanwhile, Gen Z is the "most conservative generation" in modern memory.

I find this part of this chart shocking. I sometimes talk about narrative violations, and if we knew anything about Donald Trump eight years ago, it was that young people didn't like him. And Republicans had been maybe throwing away young people for generations in order to run up their margins among seniors," Klein said. "But if you look at this chart, 75-year-old White men supported Kamala Harris at a significantly higher rate than 20-year-old White men."
"It is a real shift," Shor agreed. "This is the thing I am the most shocked by in the last four years -- that young people have gone from being the most progressive generation since the Baby Boomers, and maybe even in some ways more so, to becoming potentially the most conservative generation that we've experienced maybe in 50 to 60 years."

The data expert went on to discuss what he called "the scariest chart in this entire presentation," which shows the massive and historically unusual polarization between young men and women.

"What's crazy is that if you look at people under the age of 30, the gender gap has exploded. Eighteen-year-old men were 23 percentage points more likely to support Donald Trump than 18-year-old women, which is just completely unprecedented in American politics," Shor said

Poll-- Trump approval

Among Adults

Approve: 48% (+3)

Disapprove: 46% (-4)

Registered voters

Approve: 48% (+1)

Disapprove: 50% (=)

(shift vs last week)

----

White: 55-41

Black: 19-69

Hispanic: 48-47

---

Ages 18-29: 49-41

Ages 30-44: 42-51

Ages 45-64: 48-46

Ages 65+: 52-47


Dem: 10-86

GOP: 93-5

Indie: 40-49

---

Male: 55-40

Female: 41-52

The Economist | March 22-25 | 1,600 A

 

[dudmuck]

The Judicial Branch in its entirety IS the Deep State

https://www.uscourts.gov/file/judicial-reviewpdf-0

 

[The Sage of Main Street]

Defund radical Leftist Districts.

Finally a smart plan!

Have Gavel, Will Travel

Don't leave your District without one.

 

[OKTexas]

Sorry bout that,

1. Seems they are not so sure now, Mikes about to pull the rug out from under them.
2. Good idea, he just needs to follow through, which that will take a few days.
3. They can get retired if they want to act, The President.
4. I say full steam ahead, go get em, Sir. Mike Johnson!!!!

Speaker Johnson Issues Warning: Congress Has the Authority to Defund and Disband Federal Courts (Video) | The Gateway Pundit | by Jim Hoft

Speaker Mike Johnson's provocative warning to Congress about defunding federal courts raises critical questions about judicial power and accountability amid escalating legal challenges. This bold stance signals a potential shift in the balance of authority.

www.thegatewaypundit.com

Regards,
SirJamesofTexas

All they need do is eliminate standing for these special interest groups that are funding this lawfare. Force plaintiffs to pay their own freight.

.

 

[scruffy]

The will of the people doesn’t override the law and constitution.

Why do you hate democracy?

 

[kyzr]

All they need do is eliminate standing for these special interest groups that are funding this lawfare. Force plaintiffs to pay their own freight.

Not sure what you mean. Have an example?

 

[Frankenstein]

Eventually. But a district judge put a stop the the program nation wide.

That was wrong, correct?

So you are against saving tax payer dollars being used to pay off other peoples loans, and are for tax payer dollars being used to provide for criminal invaders who are gang members raping and pillaging

 

[Edgetho]

All they need do is eliminate standing for these special interest groups that are funding this lawfare. Force plaintiffs to pay their own freight.

.

This is the worst law on the books and it needs to be repealed. Yesterday --

The Civil Rights Attorney's Fees Awards Act of 1976 (42 U.S.C. § 1988) allows courts to award attorney's fees to the prevailing party in civil rights cases, other than the United States, to encourage enforcement of civil rights laws.

Here's a more detailed explanation:

• Civil Rights Attorney's Fees Awards Act of 1976 (42 U.S.C. § 1988):
  This law, also known as Section 1988, authorizes courts to award reasonable attorney's fees to the prevailing party in civil rights cases, with the exception of the United States.
  
  
• Purpose:
  The Act aims to encourage the enforcement of civil rights laws by making it easier for plaintiffs to access legal representation, even if they cannot afford it.
  
  
• Prevailing Party:
  The term "prevailing party" is used to describe the party who has succeeded in a civil rights case, and is entitled to an award of attorney's fees.
  
  
• Scope:
  This law applies to civil actions to enforce civil rights laws, including those brought under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, the Americans with Disabilities Act, and other federal civil rights statutes.

 

[The Sage of Main Street]

Why do you hate democracy?

The Only Right the Elitist Constitution Gives to the People Is the Right to Remain Silent

 

[The Sage of Main Street]

This is the worst law on the books and it needs to be repealed. Yesterday --

The Civil Rights Attorney's Fees Awards Act of 1976 (42 U.S.C. § 1988) allows courts to award attorney's fees to the prevailing party in civil rights cases, other than the United States, to encourage enforcement of civil rights laws.

Here's a more detailed explanation:

• Civil Rights Attorney's Fees Awards Act of 1976 (42 U.S.C. § 1988):
  This law, also known as Section 1988, authorizes courts to award reasonable attorney's fees to the prevailing party in civil rights cases, with the exception of the United States.
  
  
• Purpose:
  The Act aims to encourage the enforcement of civil rights laws by making it easier for plaintiffs to access legal representation, even if they cannot afford it.
  
  
• Prevailing Party:
  The term "prevailing party" is used to describe the party who has succeeded in a civil rights case, and is entitled to an award of attorney's fees.
  
  
• Scope:
  This law applies to civil actions to enforce civil rights laws, including those brought under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, the Americans with Disabilities Act, and other federal civil rights statutes.

Republican't

And the GOPer President wouldn't veto it. Always point these appeasements out to these one-sided fanboys.