FDA settles lawsuit over Ivermectin.

[sparky]

As of this month, all this research in in test tubes ... no human trials? ... the problem is when you infect 100 healthy young human adults with SARS, none of them will show any symptoms ... so what, exactly, is ivermectin good for? ... other than as a de-wormer ... for things like free-range poultry ...

MSN

www.msn.com

You Searched For Ivermectin - Tampa Free Press

www.tampafp.com

pharma troll days are numbered Reiny

and you want to know the reason why?
right here>>>


Newsweek was one of the few legacy media outlets to cover the latest development in the legal brawl over the Nobel Prize-winning medication, which is critical because it could reshape and curtail the FDA’s influence in promoting medical treatments.

go ahead.........show me a pfizer winner....

~S~

 

[Doc7505]

View attachment 921368

~~~~~~

FDA to Remove Warnings Against Ivermectin for COVID Treatment​

​

On March 21, a settlement was reached in a federal court in Texas in which the FDA agreed to remove its warnings against the use of Ivermectin for the treatment of COVID. This is a significant development because many doctors were prevented from prescribing COVID due to the FDA warnings and many pharmacies refused to fill prescriptions for Ivermectin. Unfortunately this development comes too late for many patients who died as a result of being unable to use Ivermectin to treat their COVID as a result of the FDA warnings against it.

Commentary:
The MOST FAMOUS ad the FDA ever issued and now they have been humiliated because they must take down all their warnings against the use of Ivermectin for the treatment of COVID. BTW, remember when suggesting the use of Ivermectin to treat COVID was considered to be “Misinformation?”
That was despite the ositive evidence that the treatment works as proven in India and the U.K.
Unfortunately, the FDA gas been wepaonized as part of that "Deep State", MAGA has mandated to Trump to Obliterate..
It appears that 'Common Sense is finally prevailing over half baked lunacy from FDA, CDC, CNN, NBC, et al.....

 

[LeroyDumonde]

I have not brought up the mRNA vaccines in this thread ... ivermectin isn't a vaccine ... it will NOT trigger our own immunization system ... in a test tube, it interferes with the viral processes within the human cell ... rather than fill our blood vessels with SARS antibodies ...

Bubba didn't finish Middle School ... of course all of chemistry is voodoo magic ... Biochemistry 301 must seem god-like to y'all ... "vaccines are bad for us on our flat Earth" ... I get it ...

Nobody claimed that ivermectin is a vaccine. But thanks for admitting that it interferes with the viral mechanism.

 

[LeroyDumonde]

Ivermectin for Prevention and Treatment of COVID-19 Infection: A Systematic Review, Meta-analysis, and Trial Sequential Analysis to Inform Clinical Guidelines

"Repurposed medicines may have a role against the SARS-CoV-2 virus. The antiparasitic ivermectin, with antiviral and anti-inflammatory properties, has now been tested in numerous clinical trials."

"Moderate-certainty evidence finds that large reductions in COVID-19 deaths are possible using ivermectin. Using ivermectin early in the clinical course may reduce numbers progressing to severe disease. The apparent safety and low cost suggest that ivermectin is likely to have a significant impact on the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic globally."

"In addition to its antiparasitic activity, it has been noted to have antiviral and anti-inflammatory properties, leading to an increasing list of therapeutic indications."

"Meta-analysis of 15 trials, assessing 2438 participants, found that ivermectin reduced the risk of death by an average of 62% (95% CI 27%–81%) compared with no ivermectin treatment [average RR (aRR) 0.38, 95% CI 0.19 to 0.73; I2 = 49%]; risk of death 2.3% versus 7.8% among hospitalized patients in this analysis, respectively (SoF Table Table22 and Figure Figure3).3)."

"TSA, using the DL random-effects method, showed that there may have been sufficient evidence accrued before the end of 2020 to show significant benefit of ivermectin over control for all-cause mortality. The cumulative z-curve in Figure Figure88 crossed the trial sequential monitoring boundaries after reaching the required IS, implying that there is firm evidence for a beneficial effect of ivermectin use over no ivermectin use in mainly hospitalized participants with mild to moderate COVID-19 infection."

"In addition to the evidence from systematic reviews, the findings of several controlled observational studies are consistent with existing evidence and suggest improved outcomes with ivermectin treatment."

"Given the evidence of efficacy, safety, low cost, and current death rates, ivermectin is likely to have an impact on health and economic outcomes of the pandemic across many countries. Ivermectin is not a new and experimental drug with an unknown safety profile. It is a WHO “Essential Medicine” already used in several different indications, in colossal cumulative volumes. Corticosteroids have become an accepted standard of care in COVID-19, based on a single RCT of dexamethasone.1 If a single RCT is sufficient for the adoption of dexamethasone, then a fortiori the evidence of 2 dozen RCTs supports the adoption of ivermectin."

But yeah, it's just one quack doctor from France that justifies Ivermectin being use to treat Covid.

 

[candycorn]

~~~~~~

FDA to Remove Warnings Against Ivermectin for COVID Treatment​

​

On March 21, a settlement was reached in a federal court in Texas in which the FDA agreed to remove its warnings against the use of Ivermectin for the treatment of COVID. This is a significant development because many doctors were prevented from prescribing COVID due to the FDA warnings and many pharmacies refused to fill prescriptions for Ivermectin. Unfortunately this development comes too late for many patients who died as a result of being unable to use Ivermectin to treat their COVID as a result of the FDA warnings against it.

Commentary:
The MOST FAMOUS ad the FDA ever issued and now they have been humiliated because they must take down all their warnings against the use of Ivermectin for the treatment of COVID. BTW, remember when suggesting the use of Ivermectin to treat COVID was considered to be “Misinformation?”
That was despite the ositive evidence that the treatment works as proven in India and the U.K.
Unfortunately, the FDA gas been wepaonized as part of that "Deep State", MAGA has mandated to Trump to Obliterate..
It appears that 'Common Sense is finally prevailing over half baked lunacy from FDA, CDC, CNN, NBC, et al.....

Your own link:

It recommends you contact the CDC.

Too damn funny.

 

[Doc7505]

Your own link:

View attachment 921819

It recommends you contact the CDC.

Too damn funny.

~~~~~~

FDA Retreats: How to Get Ivermectin, Z-Pak, and More​

FDA Retreats: How to Get Ivermectin, Z-Pak, and More | The Gateway Pundit | by Promoted Post

(Note: Thank you for supporting businesses like the one presenting a sponsored message below and working with them through the links below which benefits Gateway Pundit.

www.thegatewaypundit.com

 

[Delldude]

That's right. No chance. Clinical trials were held. No evidence of effectiveness.

Oh dear......

Final discussion​

Patients treated with azithromycin combined with nitazoxanide, hydroxychloroquine or ivermectin had significant reductions in virologic and clinical duration, hospitalization, mechanical ventilation, death and post-COVID symptoms, when compared to sex-, age- and comorbidity-matched untreated patients. The well-established safety profile of the drugs used in the present study, the likely benefits presented and the current absence of proven therapies for early COVID-19 bring ethical questions regarding the employment of placebo-control randomized clinical trials in early COVID-19. The medical decision-making on pharmacological interventions is particularly important for patients at high risk of developing severe COVID-19 and in regions where variants, mainly the P.1 variant, is highly prevalent when the natural disease course tends to be worse without pharmacological interventions.
______________________

Conclusion​

Two-to four-drug treatment regimens for early COVID-19 that obligatorily including AZI, at least one between IVE, NIT and HCG, and optionally DUTA or SPIRO, were demonstrated to be very likely effective for hospitalization, deaths and prevention of post-COVID syndrome, and the use of full placebo for further RCTs on early COVID-19 should be a matter of ethical questioning.

Early COVID-19 therapy with azithromycin plus nitazoxanide, ivermectin or hydroxychloroquine in outpatient settings significantly improved COVID-19 outcomes compared to known outcomes in untreated patients

In a prospective observational study (pre-AndroCoV Trial), the use of nitazoxanide, ivermectin and hydroxychloroquine demonstrated unexpected improvements in COVID-19 outcomes when compared to untreated patients. The apparent yet likely positive ...

www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov

 

[wamose]

Yes, the poor souls who had conditions that actually required it, thanks to the people buying it up for covid.

Fauci and the federal bureaucrats lied and killed people to make a fortune in bribe money. But what can you say about monkey see, monkey do types like yourself who just repeat what they were fed by Fauci? I guess some people never catch on. MAGA

 

[LordBrownTrout]

I have not brought up the mRNA vaccines in this thread ... ivermectin isn't a vaccine ... it will NOT trigger our own immunization system ... in a test tube, it interferes with the viral processes within the human cell ... rather than fill our blood vessels with SARS antibodies ...

Bubba didn't finish Middle School ... of course all of chemistry is voodoo magic ... Biochemistry 301 must seem god-like to y'all ... "vaccines are bad for us on our flat Earth" ... I get it ...

No, you're wrong again einsten. Ive taken almost all known vaccines except the mRNA since it just hasn't been studied enough and we have seen millions of injuries and deaths from people taking this injection. Trivia question. Am I an anti-vaxxer?

 

[PeterPilot]

I normally don't quote alt-right media but in this case, it's appropriate. This is more about overstepping the bounds of telling doctors how to treat their patients and then mocking them online.
This settlement....doesn't achieve what you think it does. It says nothing about the efficacy of ivermectin, which has already been proven NOT to have any effect on COVID-19.

FDA Settles Lawsuit, Agrees To Remove Post Mocking Ivermectin

The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) reportedly settled a lawsuit waged by three doctors, agreeing to remove social media posts mocking the drug Ivermectin.

dailycaller.com

You offer a false statement regarding the efficacy of Ivermectin against the phantom virus. In fact, in studies around the world and from piles of anecdotal information, the drug works very well against the SARS 2 bug. Early treatment is the key.

FDA, CDC and the entire federal government, along with some state governments and the MSM all have blood on their hands for suppressing information and use of Ivermectin.

 

[JackOfNoTrades]

You offer a false statement regarding the efficacy of Ivermectin against the phantom virus. In fact, in studies around the world and from piles of anecdotal information, the drug works very well against the SARS 2 bug. Early treatment is the key.

FDA, CDC and the entire federal government, along with some state governments and the MSM all have blood on their hands for suppressing information and use of Ivermectin.

It is not effective against COVID-19. Period. Early treatment. Late treatment. The studies "around the world" you quote weren't peer reviewed and didn't contain data that could be reproduced.
But, if you would like to deworm yourself because you think it will help treat or prevent the virus, have at it. No one is stopping you.
The FDA overstepped its bounds in telling doctors what they could and should not treat their patients with...and then mocked a group of them.
That's what the settlement of the lawsuit was about.

Yet another study shows little benefit for ivermectin with COVID-19

The observed median time to first recovery was 14 days in the ivermectin group and 15 in the usual-care group.

www.cidrap.umn.edu

 

[PeterPilot]

Jack Of No Trades, Jack Of False Knowledge it is sir.

 

[JackOfNoTrades]

Jack Of No Trades, Jack Of False Knowledge it is sir.

There are literally dozens of articles out there that say the same thing Peter Pecker.
I understand you want it to be true....but that don't make it true.

Ivermectin for preventing and treating COVID-19

www.cochrane.org

 

[Delldude]

There are literally dozens of articles out there that say the same thing Peter Pecker.
I understand you want it to be true....but that don't make it true.

Early COVID-19 therapy with azithromycin plus nitazoxanide, ivermectin or hydroxychloroquine in outpatient settings significantly improved COVID-19 outcomes compared to known outcomes in untreated patients

 

[JackOfNoTrades]

Early COVID-19 therapy with azithromycin plus nitazoxanide, ivermectin or hydroxychloroquine in outpatient settings significantly improved COVID-19 outcomes compared to known outcomes in untreated patients

Published online 2021 Jul 7. Not peer reviewed.

Again, just because the savior stood up in front of the country and hawked it....doesn't mean it works.

Effect of Ivermectin vs Placebo on Time to Sustained Recovery in Outpatients With Mild to Moderate COVID-19

This randomized clinical trial compares the efficacy of ivermectin vs placebo in shortening symptom duration among adult outpatients in the US with symptomatic mild to moderate COVID-19.

jamanetwork.com

 

[Delldude]

Published online 2021 Jul 7. Not peer reviewed.

Yet with proven results......using approved methods.

 

[JackOfNoTrades]

Yet with proven results......using approved methods.

Except it was debunked. Flawed study. Big holes in the conclusion.

But deworm away. No one is stopping you.

 

[eagle1462010]

COVID-19 early treatment: real-time analysis of 3,974 studies

 

[eagle1462010]

No Jack troll posts a few cherry picked studies being a WEF mouth piece.

Thousands studies out there as I just showed.

But lets pick a study that waits til the patient is about to die and give them Ivermectin and say "SEE I TOLD YOU IT DIDNT WORK"

Oh well ignore the idiot

 

[JackOfNoTrades]

No Jack troll posts a few cherry picked studies being a WEF mouth piece.

Thousands studies out there as I just showed.

But lets pick a study that waits til the patient is about to die and give them Ivermectin and say "SEE I TOLD YOU IT DIDNT WORK"

Oh well ignore the idiot

Ivermectin and hydroxy have been shown to not be effective against COVID-19 by multiple studies. They don't work.
That does not however, prevent your doctor from prescribing them if they feel it is necessary. That's the overstepping the settlement addressed. That and the mocking.

Again, feel free to deworm away. No one is stopping you.