FDA settles lawsuit over Ivermectin.

[LeroyDumonde]

It's easy for you to find links to articles you will never read and which you don't understand.

Not quite as easy for you to read and understand them.

The article mentions in vitro effects. Get what else is effective against viruses in vitro? Bleach. So that doesn't tell us anything about its effectiveness, in vivo.

Ths clinical trials held later showed absolutely no effectiveness against the covid virus whatsoever.

A quack French doctor lied about ivermectin. Giuliani picked up on this lie and fed it to the orange slob. Then the orange slob regurgitated it.

And that's it. That's how the myth was born.

It also mentions in vivo effects. Did you somehow miss those parts?

"In vivo studies of animal models revealed a broad range of antiviral effects of ivermectin, however, clinical trials are necessary to appraise the potential efficacy of ivermectin in clinical setting."

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

Tens of thousands of people probably died because they were denied ivermectin.

Yes, the poor souls who had conditions that actually required it, thanks to the people buying it up for covid.

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

It also mentions in vivo effects.

Of ivermectin, on covid? No. I understand that you meant "on viruses".

That's the problem. It had no demonstrated effectiveness. And the ethical issue with publicly pushing it as widespread treatment is the opportunity cost of forgoing other treatments (and vaccines) and creating shortages of it for those who do need it.

Trump, however, doesn't care about ethics or the responsibility of his station. . He was trying to bail himself out of a problem.

Another ethical and medical issue is that nobody had any idea of appropriate dosage. So foolish peope were self.medicating.

 

[LeroyDumonde]

Of ivermectin, on covid? No. I understand that you meant "on viruses".

I was responding to ReinyDays comment:

Can you explain (or post a link) how disrupting the communication systems in multicellular life is effective against simple viruses ... or is this just magically effective against the Covid virus, and none other ...

If Ivermectin is effective against viruses, why haven't we been using it for viral infections ... do you honestly think Big Pharm said they have enough profits? ...

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

I was responding to ReinyDays comment:

Right, I get it. That's why I said that I understood you meant "antiviral" in general.

 

[LeroyDumonde]

Right, I get it. That's why I said that I understood you meant "antiviral" in general.

And yet you said this:

The article mentions in vitro effects. Get what else is effective against viruses in vitro? Bleach. So that doesn't tell us anything about its effectiveness, in vivo.

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

And yet you said this:

Re: the covid-19 virus, because that is true. Agreed?

 

[skye]

Cattle de-wormer is good for livestock. The ivermectin pill for humans is effective. There is a difference but lib media latched on to the term de-wormer as derogatory. Three people I knew were prescribed it for covid and were over it three days later.

You are absolutely correct!

But the sheeple will be sheeple, we can do nothing to open their eyes!

 

[Delldude]

Sorry, there have been enough studies refuting its effect on treating COVID-19. Those studies show it isn't effective.
They took down the info that was deemed as mocking the doctors and inhibiting their practice.

But feel free to deworm yourself. No one is stopping you.

Maybe you should list the dates these studies were done.

 

[Delldude]

No, shortages because the orange pile of shit told lies about it, and his supporters believed those lies.

Then show proof there wasn't any shortages or your going to have to go into the phone booth.

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

Then show proof there wasn't any shortages or your going to have to go into the phone booth.

View attachment 921547

I think you meant, show proof there were shortages.

Mostly that affected the horses. Of course, they got shorted before the humans did.

But that doesn't excuse it as an ethical concern a priori, even if only considering humans who need it..

 

[Delldude]

I think you meant, show proof there were shortages.

Your claim, not mine.

Mostly that affected the horses. Of course, they got shorted before the humans did.

Try harder.....

But that doesn't excuse it as an ethical concern a priori, even if only considering humans who need it..

No chance the treatment worked successfully in those third world countries who weren't on the WEF supremacy list for quick and needed access to the vax?

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

Your claim, not mine.

Try harder.....

No chance the treatment worked successfully in those third world countries who weren't on the WEF supremacy list for quick and needed access to the vax?

That's right. No chance. Clinical trials were held. No evidence of effectiveness.

 

[Delldude]

That's right. No chance. Clinical trials were held. No evidence of effectiveness.

When was this?

 

[Orangecat]

Go enjoy your livestock suppositories.

Educate yourself, useful idiot:

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

When was this?

As it turns out, in the past. I don't really care if you believe me or not.

 

[MarathonMike]

The FDA is one of a dozen federal government agencies that needs a complete change out of leadership at the top. This "settlement" removes all doubt.

 

[eagle1462010]

Bump

 

[eagle1462010]

COVID-19 early treatment: real-time analysis of 1,280 studies

 

[SweetSue92]

View attachment 921368

maybe at some point our resident Hospital Administrator can explain Remdesivir....I mean, RunDeathIsNear. And while it's at it, people dying in mass numbers on "ventilators" and dying "of covid" while, say, being in motorcycle accidents.

This person knows the system is as crooked as it comes.