FBI’s Frantic Scramble to Redact the Jeffrey Epstein Files Revealed

Crepitus

Diamond Member
Joined
Mar 28, 2018
Messages
105,481
Reaction score
156,299
Points
3,615
Thousands of hours and hundreds of thousands of dollars in OT, mostly back in march, which I think was during the period the Bondi claimed they were "on her desk".

There have been other leaks claiming it was mostly to redact any and all mentions of trump.



 
Thousands of hours and hundreds of thousands of dollars in OT, mostly back in march, which I think was during the period the Bondi claimed they were "on her desk".

There have been other leaks claiming it was mostly to redact any and all mentions of trump.




.

Adults are done caring.






.
 
Thousands of hours and hundreds of thousands of dollars in OT, mostly back in march, which I think was during the period the Bondi claimed they were "on her desk".

There have been other leaks claiming it was mostly to redact any and all mentions of trump.




FBI worked overtime as Epstein files release was thought to be imminent – then Trump and Bondi tried to shut it down​


Kash Patel casts doubt on full release of Epstein files​




Before any of you interrupt with "no one cares", I do care; it is acceptable to voice criticism regarding the individuals for whom you have cast your vote.
 
Got a news outlet that we can actually see?

1764191088842.webp
 
Got a news outlet that we can actually see?

View attachment 1187992
 
Thousands of hours and hundreds of thousands of dollars in OT, mostly back in march, which I think was during the period the Bondi claimed they were "on her desk".

There have been other leaks claiming it was mostly to redact any and all mentions of trump.




The review of the files being the reason for the about face with regard to releasing them. Too many docs with Dotard's name on them. And maybe some pics.
 

FBI worked overtime as Epstein files release was thought to be imminent – then Trump and Bondi tried to shut it down​


Kash Patel casts doubt on full release of Epstein files​



Before any of you interrupt with "no one cares", I do care; it is acceptable to voice criticism regarding the individuals for whom you have cast your vote.
I care. I just didn't see any evidence of a specific claim of wrongdoing in any of what you just posted.

Was it intended as an internet version of a "document dump?"

Anyway, I've been saying that the unredacted files would not be released, but it appears that the FBI is moving as quickly as it can to release everything except specific names of victims, so the Trump admin is doing more than I thought it would.

Where is the proof that agents were specifically redacting Trump from the files?
 
Thousands of hours and hundreds of thousands of dollars in OT, mostly back in march, which I think was during the period the Bondi claimed they were "on her desk".

There have been other leaks claiming it was mostly to redact any and all mentions of trump.





They need to scrub all ties to Israel, the masters of the Deep State, neocons, and corrupt Democrats.
 
Do liberals ever bother to read the garbage they link? The redactions are to protect ongoing investigations and victims names. It's right in the ******* article. Yet our idiot liberals feel the need to create yet another BlueAnon conspiracy theory out of it. Pathetic.
 
Do liberals ever bother to read the garbage they link? The redactions are to protect ongoing investigations and victims names. It's right in the ******* article. Yet our idiot liberals feel the need to create yet another BlueAnon conspiracy theory out of it. Pathetic.
.

No.

.
 
Do liberals ever bother to read the garbage they link? The redactions are to protect ongoing investigations and victims names. It's right in the ******* article. Yet our idiot liberals feel the need to create yet another BlueAnon conspiracy theory out of it. Pathetic.
So you're saying that Kash and Bondi scribbed the files months ago, because the new law passed last week said they could.

Shut up, stupid.
 
15th post
Read the article moron, instead of just proving what an idiot you are. Pathetic.
I did, idiot.

They scrubbed the files months ago.

The part of the article you referenced?:

"Despite a months-long fight to keep the files private, on Nov. 19, Trump, 79, signed the Epstein Files Transparency Act, compelling the DOJ to release them within 30 days.

Reuters reported the new law allows redactions for ongoing probes and victim privacy"


Like I said: Shut up, stupid.
 
Do liberals ever bother to read the garbage they link? The redactions are to protect ongoing investigations and victims names. It's right in the ******* article. Yet our idiot liberals feel the need to create yet another BlueAnon conspiracy theory out of it. Pathetic.

I care. I just didn't see any evidence of a specific claim of wrongdoing in any of what you just posted.

Was it intended as an internet version of a "document dump?"

Anyway, I've been saying that the unredacted files would not be released, but it appears that the FBI is moving as quickly as it can to release everything except specific names of victims, so the Trump admin is doing more than I thought it would.

Where is the proof that agents were specifically redacting Trump from the files?



And Trump's name was redacted.

 
Back
Top Bottom