FBI scheduling interviews with 6 lawmakers who encouraged military members to refuse 'illegal orders'

[OhPleaseJustQuit]

Protecting pedophiles and going after Veterans.

.

Your cult sure is.





.

 

[SweetTea]

All military strikes.

How is bombing Qaddafi's residence a military target? What about the residences near his that were also destroyed? Bush and Obama bombed houses, cars and compounds because of suspected terrorists. How are those military targets? Weren't they attempting to protect the US from potential future terrorist threats? Isn't that similar to protecting the US from the cartels who are delivering drugs to the country? Yes, of course it is.

The fact that Trump is hiding the legal rationale for the strikes is pretty suspicious. Not to mention all the people who resigned specifically because they don’t believe it’s legal.

It isn't suspicious. He doesn't owe any further explanation that what he has already given, just as Obama and Bush and Clinton and Reagan didn't offer any further explanation because an explanation was not needed. It was obvious. It is obvious now as well to non-TDS folks but not to you loons because you have gone off the deep end and don't apply any common sense or logic to anything. It is all just oppose Trump at any cost, no matter how nonsensical. It's intellectually void and very hypocritical.

What’s to stop the president from invading Venezuela?

You mean like the Korean War? What about Granada or Panama? Kosovo ring any bells? You are obviously very ignorant on this subject.

Let me guess, you guys have soft spot for Maduro.

 

[Admiral Rockwell Tory]

Thought you taught Engrish.

Quite familiar isn't adept.

I taught several subjects of which American government and math were primary. I often switched between subjects and even taught both at the same time in the same schools.

I am pretty adept if you want to use that term. Far more than any non-lawyer.

 

[Zincwarrior]

They don't have to. They previously authorized these types of actions.

Cite it.

 

[Delldude]

Cite it.

Did before. Tired of educating uninformed posters.

 

[Robert W]

.

Your cult sure is.





.

Posters like Fort Fun can't define what a pedophile really is. They think the meaning is teens. Their minds are sick.

Epstein preyed on teenagers over 14 I believe and a pedophile prey on children not yet arrived at puberty. A 3-year-old is a good example. So, all their nonsense about pedophiles is just lying.

 

[j-mac]

When did they do anything of the sort? There was not one false statement in the video.

I believe their intent was to not only undermine moral, but also to encourage an insubordination incident. I thought I already said that.

You made two large assumptions here, neither of which are backed by anything close to a fact or reality. It is just your butthurt.

I'm not assuming anything. I have said that the courts, if taken to that would figure it out. I neither have any personal feelings in this, nor any skin in that game. The mistake is your own emotional assumptions.

I have repeated many times that what they did was wrong.

Good, then we should be on the same page.

However, making is criminal is a stretch not possible to make by anything that anyone has produced this far.

Well, a rational person would tell you that it doesn't matter what anyone in here thinks about anything. Hell, we don't even know how many of them are actual human beings.

I personally wish they had not made the video because it proved that the Trump administration is being overreactive to their attempt at hyperbole. It just shows that come conservatives are no better than the liberals when it comes to truth in government.

They're looking into it...Do you not trust those investigating?

The best thing to have done is ignore it and it would die out immediately.

And you didn't because?

As to my service, **** you very much!

I wouldn't question it had you decided to act like you've been in....

 

[Admiral Rockwell Tory]

I believe their intent was to not only undermine moral, but also to encourage an insubordination incident. I thought I already said that.

What evidence do you have? None.

I'm not assuming anything. I have said that the courts, if taken to that would figure it out. I neither have any personal feelings in this, nor any skin in that game. The mistake is your own emotional assumptions.


Good, then we should be on the same page.

Well, a rational person would tell you that it doesn't matter what anyone in here thinks about anything. Hell, we don't even know how many of them are actual human beings.

They're looking into it...Do you not trust those investigating?

And you didn't because?

I wouldn't question it had you decided to act like you've been in....

Again, **** you very much!

 

[j-mac]

What evidence do you have? None.

Personally? Why would you think I am privy to any of the investigation? Look pal, in case you haven't noticed, we are on an anonymous message board....It's all speculation....

Again, **** you very much!

 

[Marener]

How is bombing Qaddafi's residence a military target? What about the residences near his that were also destroyed? Bush and Obama bombed houses, cars and compounds because of suspected terrorists. How are those military targets? Weren't they attempting to protect the US from potential future terrorist threats? Isn't that similar to protecting the US from the cartels who are delivering drugs to the country? Yes, of course it is.

Comparing acts of terrorism to selling cocaine is an absurd comparison.

It isn't suspicious. He doesn't owe any further explanation that what he has already given, just as Obama and Bush and Clinton and Reagan didn't offer any further explanation because an explanation was not needed. It was obvious. It is obvious now as well to non-TDS folks but not to you loons because you have gone off the deep end and don't apply any common sense or logic to anything. It is all just oppose Trump at any cost, no matter how nonsensical. It's intellectually void and very hypocritical.

The America people deserve to see the legal rationale. Don’t you believe in open transparent governance? It’s far from obvious and if the leaks are accurate, it’s a lot different than what you are thinking.

Obama published his rationale for attacking Libya.

You mean like the Korean War? What about Granada or Panama? Kosovo ring any bells? You are obviously very ignorant on this subject.

Let me guess, you guys have soft spot for Maduro.

Just trying to figure out the rules. Seems like Trump doesn’t think any applies.

If we arent at war, then its just extrajudicial murder.

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

How is bombing Qaddafi's residence a military target? What about the residences near his that were also destroyed? Bush and Obama bombed houses, cars and compounds because of suspected terrorists. How are those military targets? Weren't they attempting to protect the US from potential future terrorist threats? Isn't that similar to protecting the US from the cartels who are delivering drugs to the country? Yes, of course it is.



It isn't suspicious. He doesn't owe any further explanation that what he has already given, just as Obama and Bush and Clinton and Reagan didn't offer any further explanation because an explanation was not needed. It was obvious. It is obvious now as well to non-TDS folks but not to you loons because you have gone off the deep end and don't apply any common sense or logic to anything. It is all just oppose Trump at any cost, no matter how nonsensical. It's intellectually void and very hypocritical.



You mean like the Korean War? What about Granada or Panama? Kosovo ring any bells? You are obviously very ignorant on this subject.

Let me guess, you guys have soft spot for Maduro.

So you buy the fat rapist's claims that these are enemy combatants.

 

[HikerGuy83]

So you buy the fat rapist's claims that these are enemy combatants.

What's Eric Swalwell got to do with this?

Or did you mean Rashida Tlaib?

 

[Admiral Rockwell Tory]

Personally? Why would you think I am privy to any of the investigation? Look pal, in case you haven't noticed, we are on an anonymous message board....It's all speculation....

No. It is not speculation to watch the video and determine no crime was committed. Sorry to tell you that but anyone who has watched it would agree. Nothing there!

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

What's Eric Swalwell got to do with this?

Or did you mean Rashida Tlaib?

Haha, poor cultist reflexively has an outburst, per his programming.

 

[struth]

Comparing acts of terrorism to selling cocaine is an absurd comparison.

The America people deserve to see the legal rationale. Don’t you believe in open transparent governance? It’s far from obvious and if the leaks are accurate, it’s a lot different than what you are thinking.

Obama published his rationale for attacking Libya.

Just trying to figure out the rules. Seems like Trump doesn’t think any applies.

If we arent at war, then its just extrajudicial murder.

Saying all these narcoterrorist do is sell cocaine is grossly understating what they do and pure ignorance

He’s stated the reason, they are narcoterrorist flooding our country with death

Of course he does, don’t be a narcoterrorist

Extrajudicial murder? Haha first they aren’t Americans or under the jurisdiction of any courts, secondly murder is an unlawful killing, killing terrorist is lawful

 

[DonGlock26]

 

[Marener]

Saying all these narcoterrorist do is sell cocaine is grossly understating what they do and pure ignorance

He’s stated the reason, they are narcoterrorist flooding our country with death

Of course he does, don’t be a narcoterrorist

Extrajudicial murder? Haha first they aren’t Americans or under the jurisdiction of any courts, secondly murder is an unlawful killing, killing terrorist is lawful

Define terrorist.

 

[struth]

Nice to hear from a real war hero

 

[struth]

Define terrorist.

Geez you really are clueless

https://uscode.house.gov/view.xhtml?path=/prelim@title18/part1/chapter113B&edition=prelim

 

[DonGlock26]

Nice to hear from a real war hero

He cut right through the Seditious Six supporters' bullshit.