FBI scheduling interviews with 6 lawmakers who encouraged military members to refuse 'illegal orders'

A conspiracy to commit sedition and or mutiny.

Probable cause are facts.

It's enough to investigate and use the tools of investigation. I believe the six have been asked to talk to the FBI.
Let's see if they talk to the FBI.




Where is your evidence to make this charge? You have none.

They will only talk to the FBI if they are stupid. I am sure most are aware of the trap used against General Flynn.
 
Where is your evidence to make this charge? You have none.

They will only talk to the FBI if they are stupid. I am sure most are aware of the trap used against General Flynn.

You keep asking the same question. The video is enough to investigate.

What? They will plead the fifth?

Who set the trap? The Obama admin?
 
Where are they going to look if they refuse to talk?

Have you been reading my posts? They can look at their emails and text messages with search warrants ala Operation Arctic Frost or a grand jury's subpoenas.
 
Have you been reading my posts? They can look at their emails and text messages with search warrants ala Operation Arctic Frost or a grand jury subpoenas.
You still haven't come up with a valid charge. Need I remind you that again? No charge, no probable cause, no grand jury, no subpoenas, no evidence, and no indictment returned, and how many taxpayer dollars wasted?

Arctic Frost has nothing to do with this? Are you trying to deflect?
 
Actually I think they were trying to get the grunts to question their orders, totally shattering the chain-of-command.
Or pressure on their immediate commanders, to refuse unlawful orders, then the grunts don't have to be involved at all?

Their commanders seek the military legal beagle advice, when in doubt....is how it is suppose to work? No??
 
15th post
You still haven't come up with a valid charge. Need I remind you that again? No charge, no probable cause, no grand jury, no subpoenas, no evidence, and no indictment returned, and how many taxpayer dollars wasted?

Arctic Frost has nothing to do with this? Are you trying to deflect?

The investigation comes before the charges. You aren't too good at this.

Oh but it does. Did the FBI get the communications of Republicans as part of OAF?
 
You don't remember Comey telling us that even thought Hillary Clinton's email servers violated numerous criminal statute, she could not be prosecuted for them because no one else had been?
Please document when Comey said "Hillary Clinton's email server violated numerous criminal statue."

Comey actually said that the FBI investigation had concluded that Clinton had been "extremely careless" but recommended that no charges be filed because Clinton did not act with criminal intent, the historical standard for pursuing prosecution.

Why, in your opinion, would Comey get to dictate regarding the UCMJ, anyway?
It is also clear that orders are presumed to be lawful and that a person's personal philosophy cannot render an order unlawful, and that the burden of proof is on the defendant if he or she uses that defense.
Orders may be manifestly unlawful, or less obviously so - especially where there has been no ruling such as troops being illegally deployed to Los Angeles. It's not always an easy call for military personnel to make.
 
Back
Top Bottom