FBI doubted probable cause for Mar-a-Lago raid but pushed forward amid pressure from Biden DOJ, emails reveal

Wrong again - he declined prosecution because he didn't think he could get a conviction.
Yet without a doubt he showed intent being knowingly and willingly. The proof is there. He decided to use prosecutorial discretion in not pursuing charges.

It DOES NOT translate to incapacity to stand trial, which is what the other poster claimed.
More or less it does. Biden wasn't playing with a full deck and would elicit sympathy from a jury making spending the money on a trial a waste.
 
Wrong again - he declined prosecution because he didn't think he could get a conviction.
"Based on our direct interactions with and observations of him, he is someone from whom many jurors will want to identify reasonable doubt," the report states. "It would be difficult to convince a jury that they should convict him—by then a former president well into his eighties—of a serious felony that requires a mental state of willfulness."

Because Biden had dementia. The quote above which came directly from the Special Counsel report makes this clear. Why keep lying about these facts?
 
"Based on our direct interactions with and observations of him, he is someone from whom many jurors will want to identify reasonable doubt," the report states. "It would be difficult to convince a jury that they should convict him—by then a former president well into his eighties—of a serious felony that requires a mental state of willfulness."

Because Biden had dementia. The quote above which came directly from the Special Counsel report makes this clear. Why keep lying about these facts?

There is NOTHING in Hur's report about any dementia or inability to stand trial.

Elderly person with faulty memory is not same as a dementia diagnosis you ignorant fool.
 
Senile dementia, dude.

"Dude" stop posting ignorant nonsense.

No, dementia is not the same as poor memory; dementia is a broad term for significant, progressive loss of mental function (memory, thinking, reasoning) that disrupts daily life, while normal aging involves mild forgetfulness that doesn't impair function, and you can even have dementia without memory loss initially, like with Dementia with Lewy Bodies. Memory loss is a symptom of dementia, but dementia also involves issues with judgment, language, problem-solving, and behavior, unlike typical age-related memory slips.

 
Ahem…I believe it was I who pointed out that Hur specifically said that Biden had WILLFULLY retained and disclosed classified materials.
And said there was not enough evidence to charge him with a crime. The entire rest of the report exists to support that conclusion.

So, clearly you are confised about what the law says. And clearly you are very confused about what Trump was charged with. Because you lied and said you read the indictment. You also lied and said you read Hur's report. You did not.

So you will repeat your lie forever.
 
Last edited:
If I willfully take something I’m not supposed to, and never give it back, did I act with intent?
Maybe not, you just forgot to give it back. Happens between family member's all the time. Usually ends up with a brother realizing something has been borrowed when he goes to use it. Figures out the brother got it, and quickly enquires within.. 😆

Crack head family members are the worst offenders... 😆
 
"Dude" stop posting ignorant nonsense.

No, dementia is not the same as poor memory; dementia is a broad term for significant, progressive loss of mental function (memory, thinking, reasoning) that disrupts daily life, while normal aging involves mild forgetfulness that doesn't impair function, and you can even have dementia without memory loss initially, like with Dementia with Lewy Bodies. Memory loss is a symptom of dementia, but dementia also involves issues with judgment, language, problem-solving, and behavior, unlike typical age-related memory sliIps.

Well if it's not that bad of a thing like onset of Alzheimers, senile dementia etc, then why couldn't he be tried ??
 
And said there was not enough evidence to charge him with a crime. The entire rest of the report exists to support that conclusion.

So, clearly you are confised about what the law says. And clearly you are very confused about what Trump was charged with. Because you lied and said you read the indictment. You also lied and said you read Hur's report. You did not.

So you will repeat your lie forever.

Nope, he never said that and you can’t show it. He said there wasn’t sufficient evidence to convince a jury because they would see him as an elderly man with a poor memory. In other words, how Biden would present himself would sway a jury more than the evidence would, meaning, the jury would just be sympathetic , as Hur stated.
 
Well if it's not that bad of a thing like onset of Alzheimers, senile dementia etc, then why couldn't he be tried ??
That wasn't the reason given.

The reason given was that there wasn't sufficient evidence.
 
The raid occurred because Trump defied a grand jury subpoena and obstructed justice.

Biden didn’t do that.
Nah. The raid occurred because of your cult's TDS and Biden's knowledge that Trump was going to run again and kick his ass.
 
And said there was not enough evidence to charge him with a crime. The entire rest of the report exists to support that conclusion.

So, clearly you are confised about what the law says. And clearly you are very confused about what Trump was charged with. Because you lied and said you read the indictment. You also lied and said you read Hur's report. You did not.

So you will repeat your lie forever.

I read that trump was charged with multiple counts of retaining classified materials, something Biden got a pass on
 
And that's how we know you are a liar and didnt read his report.

And it was already shown in the thread.

What you showed didn’t say what you think it said. Post the text and the page number
 
Hur said NOTHING like that.

He didn't say Biden is a criminal, did not say he is not competent to stand trial. These claims are ******* ridiculous.
Dude. You can stop defending the Vegetable. He fucked the country, then he fucked your party. Both royally.
 
15th post
More or less it does. Biden wasn't playing with a full deck and would elicit sympathy from a jury making spending the money on a trial a waste.
Hur was just making political points in the equivalent of sour grapes.
Instead of saying he couldn't prove intent, he instead blamed that a jury would be sympathetic.
 
I read that trump was charged with multiple counts of retaining classified materials, something Biden got a pass on
Right, because you dont understand the law or the charges and don't care to do so. Because you married a failed talking point.
 
Back
Top Bottom