FBI agent under oath: FBI met weekly with Big Tech to censor political information.

None of what you said makes any sense. The “opposing party” has the testimony.

These leaks to conservative media are about framing a narrative using the most damning details they have and none of the exculpatory details.
the opposing party didn’t take the deposition
 
These are Republican attorneys General on a fishing expedition against the Biden administration, nothing more.
the court disagrees and says it’s legit and can continue on. This is a huge first amendment case…not looking good for all the named defendants
 
the court disagrees and says it’s legit and can continue on. This is a huge first amendment case…not looking good for all the named defendants
The named defendants being the Biden administration and not Twitter as State Actors.
 
This is a lie.

The FBI didn’t ‘censor’ anything.

Social media independently and voluntarily edited their own content.
You do seem eager to humiliate yourself by defending and pretending that this did not happen. The emails are out there, the facts are out there. There are no rumors, Elon Musk released the facts. Far more is coming. What part of that is not clear to you?
 
You do seem eager to humiliate yourself by defending and pretending that this did not happen. The emails are out there, the facts are out there. There are no rumors, Elon Musk released the facts. Far more is coming. What part of that is not clear to you?
Clayton is a paid DNC shill. Nothing is clear to him except what his master's pay him for.

Call it... misinformation. :p
 
No problem, but first can I ask why I need to do so given you’re a lawyer who has argued dozens of cases in federal court?

Seems like something you’d know.
it is. depositions aren’t usually done in federal court. they are done at law offices or neutral meeting places. They aren’t trials…judges don’t even after to be at deposition
 
it is. depositions aren’t usually done in federal court. they are done at law offices or neutral meeting places. They aren’t trials…judges don’t even after to be at deposition
Clearly you don’t know the rules that govern depositions. It’s just weird because I would have thought a lawyer would know this.
 
Twitter can’t “cover up” a NY Post story. It’s impossible. The story was always on their website. How can social media stop people from viewing it?

It can’t.
Twitter banned the NY Post for publishing the Hunter laptop story and what it contained. It all happened and is now being disclosed.

If you want to deny it happened and play the fool, hey, go for it!
 
Drama queen.

How much has this laptop affected politics in the last two years? Zero. Yet you think it was some kind of bombshell? It’s not.
You saying the Hunter Biden laptop story is not a bombshell, does not chant the act that it is a bombshell and far more is coming.

Denying that it happened or that it is hugely important does not change the face. TRUE, you do wish it was not a bombshell or that it influenced the election. If the fact that it happened and that the MSM continues to do the same thing means far more about you and your character. Pathetic.
 
Twitter banned the NY Post for publishing the Hunter laptop story and what it contained.
The NY Post most definitely did publish their story in print and on their website.

Twitter can’t stop that.
 
You saying the Hunter Biden laptop story is not a bombshell, does not chant the act that it is a bombshell and far more is coming.

Denying that it happened or that it is hugely important does not change the face. TRUE, you do wish it was not a bombshell or that it influenced the election. If the fact that it happened and that the MSM continues to do the same thing means far more about you and your character. Pathetic.
The laptop has been around for years, and you’re still trying to tell me that “more is coming”?

What are you smoking?

It’s not a bombshell. If it were a bombshell, we’d be talking about what’s on the laptop and not a rehash of a story we already knew.
 
And the only thing leaked was they had a meeting once a week as the election approached?

All bone, no meat.
You are an easy mark.

I wish I could play poker against you, Dupe.
 
He was not the Commander in Chief who oversaw the implementation of the Doha Accords. Nor was he the Commander in Chief during the accelerated withdrawal from the 8,600 troops to the bare minimum needed to support the Afghan Army in the field, 2,500. With Trump as CiC the so called Conditional Withdrawal's was not based on the Taliban achieving the conditions of the agreement, is was more like "We're gonna Skedaddle as long as you don't shoot at us" Accord.

Biden didn't change that either. But he started with the 2,500.
Veggie Joe was Commander In Chief who said he wouldn't leave a single American behind, and left thousands behind.

Veggie Joe also left $85 BILLION in arms behind for the Taliban to play with, Simp.

You really are stupid.
 

Forum List

Back
Top