Favorite PC Game

Does World of Warcraft have a single player option or is it multiplayer, only? Also, is it first person, 3rd or just some type of RPG? I have often wondered about that game, but didn't want to commit to it until I found out more.

I recently purchased GTA IV and was very disappointed.

WOW is online only and a pay to play. Screw that.

Play rift. It's free to play
 
30 hours into NV and I got a corrupted save file. Talk about raging. I never played it again.

On Skyrim my character glitches into his stealth roll animation 20 hours in. Couldn't walk normally. Did start that one over.

If I could just remember to save frequently I could avoid a lot of the headaches. Sadly I get so immersed I forget.

Did you you try one of the other saves? FNV did three auto-saves. I recall having one corrupt on me once, but just loaded the prior save and went on.

Never had any issues with Skyrim. I bought that one late - which often helps. It was fully patched (and I only paid $10.)

Steam has spoiled me - I won't pay more than $20 for any game. I really want Rome II - but will not pay $60 for it. I might have to wait a year, but it will drop to $20 at some point!
 
Does World of Warcraft have a single player option or is it multiplayer, only? Also, is it first person, 3rd or just some type of RPG? I have often wondered about that game, but didn't want to commit to it until I found out more.

I recently purchased GTA IV and was very disappointed.

You might try Torchlight II - it's got a good single player game - and no monthly extortion fee. Done by the makers of Diablo and Diablo II.
 
Right now I'm playing Battlefield 4 but on console. The mode Defuse is sacking the free hours out of my life.
 
I rented Call Of Duty Ghosts. The best maps ever in a cod since 3. Sadly they butchered the play llists.Removed 10 of the most popular modes.
 
Right now I'm playing Battlefield 4 but on console. The mode Defuse is sacking the free hours out of my life.
Youre wasting your precious time playing Battlefield on console?

I don't like shooters on a keyboard. The new consoles offer 64 player matches. Besides that the mode I play is a forced low player count because the maps are not designed for that many players.
 
Besides that I have Battlefield 3 on PC and other than more players there is no difference. PC elitists like to think so but I have and play both and that is the only difference.

I don't care about graphics. If the game play is good that's all that matters to me.
 
Besides that I have Battlefield 3 on PC and other than more players there is no difference. PC elitists like to think so but I have and play both and that is the only difference.

I don't care about graphics. If the game play is good that's all that matters to me.
Its the gamepad. How to play shooter with a gamepad? We should try a test and create a match with one team using gamepads and the other keyboards and mouses.

Yeah, and its the low frame rate of 30 with drops that allows no fast movements anyway. And its the Graphics that isn´t HD or detailed. And its the 32 Player limitation, sure. Its just the whole fucking 7 years old box which is just not made to run modern games like BF.
 
Last edited:
Besides that I have Battlefield 3 on PC and other than more players there is no difference. PC elitists like to think so but I have and play both and that is the only difference.

I don't care about graphics. If the game play is good that's all that matters to me.
Its the gamepad. How to play shooter with a gamepad? We should try a test and create a match with one team using gamepads and the other keyboards and mouses.

Yeah, and its the low frame rate of 30 with drops that allows no fast movements anyway. And its the Graphics that isn´t HD or detailed. And its the 32 Player limitation, sure. Its just the whole fucking 7 years old box which is just not made to run modern games like BF.

Dude get with the times. The new consoles come out in a week. It's 720 to 1080P depending on the sysyem. The 720 console gets up scaled to 1080 and the player limit is 64 not 32 or whatever. The frame rate is 60 FPS and on my pc games that run at 110 are no different than anything above 40 on console.

Besides that gaming is about the fun and enjoyment not some stupid specs
 
Besides that I have Battlefield 3 on PC and other than more players there is no difference. PC elitists like to think so but I have and play both and that is the only difference.

I don't care about graphics. If the game play is good that's all that matters to me.
Its the gamepad. How to play shooter with a gamepad? We should try a test and create a match with one team using gamepads and the other keyboards and mouses.

Yeah, and its the low frame rate of 30 with drops that allows no fast movements anyway. And its the Graphics that isn´t HD or detailed. And its the 32 Player limitation, sure. Its just the whole fucking 7 years old box which is just not made to run modern games like BF.

Dude get with the times. The new consoles come out in a week. It's 720 to 1080P depending on the sysyem. The 720 console gets up scaled to 1080 and the player limit is 64 not 32 or whatever. The frame rate is 60 FPS and on my pc games that run at 110 are no different than anything above 40 on console.

Besides that gaming is about the fun and enjoyment not some stupid specs
Its isn´t about specs. It is about old consoles pulling down the quality of PC games. That´s over with the new consoles for a few years.

Look at this, a game made for PC and then ported to console and not the other way round: Crysis.

Crysis, PC, Cryengine 2, 2007:
600x.jpg


200 % Zoom:
600x.jpg



Crysis, XBOX360, Cryengine 3, 2011:
600x.jpg


200 % Zoom:
600x.jpg
 
Bethesda games are a glitch ridden mess. I had to restart FNV 3 fucking times.

There were about a half-dozen tweaks that I had to apply to Fallout 3 - including disabling auto-saves. Once done, never had a problem.

With New Vegas, never had a problem in the first place.

30 hours into NV and I got a corrupted save file. Talk about raging. I never played it again.

On Skyrim my character glitches into his stealth roll animation 20 hours in. Couldn't walk normally. Did start that one over.

If I could just remember to save frequently I could avoid a lot of the headaches. Sadly I get so immersed I forget.

I had a corrupted save file in Skyrim, but I just went back to an earlier save. Just remember don't do the quick save so much. Use the real saves, otherwise you could put yourself in quite a pickle. I have played Skyrim over and over about 20 times, each time with a different character. I'd install it again, but it's too much of a hassle waiting for Steam to push its mandatory updates. My satellite system won't allow that.
 
I was finally able to set Space Marine on the easiest level and went back through the area where I fight the boss. I'm still getting my head handed to me. This is where I say good bye to an otherwise good game that had a lot of potential until I encountered the unbeatable boss. That's what happened to me with Far Cry 3. I gave up with the boss.

I remember a similar issue with Quake 4. You would go into a room and defeat the boss, but with limited health and very little ammo, you'd enter another room, only to run into another boss, and a boss after that. I cheated by giving myself unlimited ammo and health packs and went from there.

At least in Skyrim, there are places to hide behind when fighting a boss.

There are no places to hide in Space Marine and you are constantly attacked by the boss as well as hordes of Orks. The game is decidedly anti-player.
 
Last edited:
All the Crysis games were good games.But then Crysis 2 and 3 became nothing but linear walk throughs. The open world was taken away from both games. Crysis 3 was extremely short, too, and in my opinion lacked any repeatable gameplay. Once I finished it, that was it
I didn't finish the last boss scene. I got sick of it. I lost it all with the crash, and I have no desire to reload it.
 
Besides that I have Battlefield 3 on PC and other than more players there is no difference. PC elitists like to think so but I have and play both and that is the only difference.

I don't care about graphics. If the game play is good that's all that matters to me.
Its the gamepad. How to play shooter with a gamepad? We should try a test and create a match with one team using gamepads and the other keyboards and mouses.

Yeah, and its the low frame rate of 30 with drops that allows no fast movements anyway. And its the Graphics that isn´t HD or detailed. And its the 32 Player limitation, sure. Its just the whole fucking 7 years old box which is just not made to run modern games like BF.

Dude get with the times. The new consoles come out in a week. It's 720 to 1080P depending on the sysyem. The 720 console gets up scaled to 1080 and the player limit is 64 not 32 or whatever. The frame rate is 60 FPS and on my pc games that run at 110 are no different than anything above 40 on console.

Besides that gaming is about the fun and enjoyment not some stupid specs

Not tomentiuon the ones I see look no different than they always have. I mean jeez you'd think it would have advanced further by now. Sure the game play may be better. But they stil;l can't get something simple like hands correct.
 
All the Crysis games were good games.But then Crysis 2 and 3 became nothing but linear walk throughs. The open world was taken away from both games. Crysis 3 was extremely short, too, and in my opinion lacked any repeatable gameplay. Once I finished it, that was it
I didn't finish the last boss scene. I got sick of it. I lost it all with the crash, and I have no desire to reload it.
While Cysis is an Enthusiast-Game in all fields, such like AI, Graphics, Physics and difficulty, Crysis 2 and 3 are mainstream games.


:) Since 2007
43y7.jpg
 
I had Crysis 1 and outside of looking great it did nothing else special.

You guys are looking at things from a nostalgic point of view.
 
Back
Top Bottom