Father with his daughter uses his legal gun to fight off 4 robbers. 4 to 1 and the good guy won...

[sealybobo]

People who talk about their guns a lot should lose them

So exercising your first amendment rights should cause you to lose your 2nd?

Wow. The liberal party is very proud of you.

Corporate America is conservative just not when it comes to guns

No, corporate America is not conservative, some are, most are neutral, the majority will run left because they are cowards.

Do you know any liberal board members? Name the companies that are run by liberals. Fortune 500s.

I can tell you the ceos and vps are republicans. You must not know any.

Amazing the shit poor republicans either don’t know or won’t admit

Here you go...

See Where Major Companies Lean Politically

These companies are not liberal my friend

How Your Pay Stacks Up With the CEO’s

You can see which companies are run by liberals and which are not based on what they pay their employees.

 

[airplanemechanic]

That's right. If they pay their women only 70% of what they pay men, they might work for Hillary Clinton.

 

[sealybobo]

That's right. If they pay their women only 70% of what they pay men, they might work for Hillary Clinton.

Hey look another Republican lying about Hillary

According to the 2008 salaries provided by the Clinton campaign — which, again, includes anyone who even worked part of the year — the median salary for women was $39,500, while the median for men was $43,000. That works out roughly to women making 92 cents for every dollar earned by men. (In other years, it was the opposite — but as we noted earlier, the median for all seven years combined showed median salaries to be the same.)

Gender Pay Gap in Clinton's Senate Office? - FactCheck.org

RNC chairman Reince Priebus based his claim on a report by the Washington Free Beacon

Fake news anyone?

Pushing back against that analysis, the Clinton campaign provided FactCheck.org a list of the names, titles and annual salaries of every full-time person employed in Clinton’s Senate office between 2002 and 2008. Those data show the median salary for men and women to be the same at $40,000. The data also show Clinton hired roughly twice as many women as men.

Are you a liar or stupid?

 

[abrere]

if you believe ANYTHING that the clintons claim, you're the biggest fool that ever walked the earth.

 

[ThunderKiss1965]

One of the experts on tv today was talking about who you need to worry about committing these mass shootings, are those that talk about guns ALL the time.

So all those who constantly talk about banning guns are going to start killing people ? That's weird.

 

[ThunderKiss1965]

That's right. If they pay their women only 70% of what they pay men, they might work for Hillary Clinton.

Hey look another Republican lying about Hillary

According to the 2008 salaries provided by the Clinton campaign — which, again, includes anyone who even worked part of the year — the median salary for women was $39,500, while the median for men was $43,000. That works out roughly to women making 92 cents for every dollar earned by men. (In other years, it was the opposite — but as we noted earlier, the median for all seven years combined showed median salaries to be the same.)

Gender Pay Gap in Clinton's Senate Office? - FactCheck.org

RNC chairman Reince Priebus based his claim on a report by the Washington Free Beacon

Fake news anyone?

Pushing back against that analysis, the Clinton campaign provided FactCheck.org a list of the names, titles and annual salaries of every full-time person employed in Clinton’s Senate office between 2002 and 2008. Those data show the median salary for men and women to be the same at $40,000. The data also show Clinton hired roughly twice as many women as men.

Are you a liar or stupid?

I'm no mathematician but 92 cents is less than a dollar.

 

[airplanemechanic]

That's right. If they pay their women only 70% of what they pay men, they might work for Hillary Clinton.

Hey look another Republican lying about Hillary

According to the 2008 salaries provided by the Clinton campaign — which, again, includes anyone who even worked part of the year — the median salary for women was $39,500, while the median for men was $43,000. That works out roughly to women making 92 cents for every dollar earned by men. (In other years, it was the opposite — but as we noted earlier, the median for all seven years combined showed median salaries to be the same.)

Gender Pay Gap in Clinton's Senate Office? - FactCheck.org

RNC chairman Reince Priebus based his claim on a report by the Washington Free Beacon

Fake news anyone?

Pushing back against that analysis, the Clinton campaign provided FactCheck.org a list of the names, titles and annual salaries of every full-time person employed in Clinton’s Senate office between 2002 and 2008. Those data show the median salary for men and women to be the same at $40,000. The data also show Clinton hired roughly twice as many women as men.

Are you a liar or stupid?

If she's so much for women, why aren't those numbers exactly the same, or even skewed for women?

So all you did was post another link showing she doesn't pay women the same as men?

How many links do we need to prove me right?

 

[ThunderKiss1965]

One of the experts on tv today was talking about who you need to worry about committing these mass shootings, are those that talk about guns ALL the time.

Only morons spend their days worrying about mass shootings while ignoring the real driver of violent crime: blacks and latinos.

The real driver of crimes is poverty which is an objective of the Republican Party.

Interesting theory. So negroes murder each other because they are poor? Could you explain the theory behind that? What is the profit motive behind killing some local negro, getting locked up for a decade or two, and then being rightly unable to find a job?

It's lack of financial hope for the future.

OK, but what does that have to do with murdering some negro and then going to prison for it? Most white people know they won't be the 1 percenters. That's why they call them the 1 percenters! So wouldn't that hopelessness affect them, too?

No they want be the so called "1%" but they don't have to be dirt poor either.

 

[ThunderKiss1965]

young lady had to call the police the other night.....they arrived 1 hour and 20 minutes later...luckily she was armed and able to take care of herself till they arrived.....i dont think yall realize how long it can take police to arrive in rural areas

Yes. And? What is the solution to that problem?

Protect you and yours by any means necessary the police are no longer able to do so their job seems to be restricted to investigating the aftermath of crime.

 

[abrere]

so what's all that bs got to do with a successful armed defense case? are you trying to hide the facts? I was once charged by 4 punks who wanted to beat me down and didn't believe that I had a gun (it was very dark) When my .45, with hot handload, lit up the entire county, fired over their heads, they got back INTO their car a LOT faster than they'd got out of it! 2 more steps and I'd have killed all 4, to prove that I was attacked by more than one.

 

[Lewdog]

One of the experts on tv today was talking about who you need to worry about committing these mass shootings, are those that talk about guns ALL the time.

So all those who constantly talk about banning guns are going to start killing people ? That's weird.

No. It's those that are constantly talking about pr-guns, writing stories about guns, drawing pictures of guns, bragging about their gun collection, buying t-shirts and other stuff depicting guns... etc.

 

[sealybobo]

That's right. If they pay their women only 70% of what they pay men, they might work for Hillary Clinton.

Hey look another Republican lying about Hillary

According to the 2008 salaries provided by the Clinton campaign — which, again, includes anyone who even worked part of the year — the median salary for women was $39,500, while the median for men was $43,000. That works out roughly to women making 92 cents for every dollar earned by men. (In other years, it was the opposite — but as we noted earlier, the median for all seven years combined showed median salaries to be the same.)

Gender Pay Gap in Clinton's Senate Office? - FactCheck.org

RNC chairman Reince Priebus based his claim on a report by the Washington Free Beacon

Fake news anyone?

Pushing back against that analysis, the Clinton campaign provided FactCheck.org a list of the names, titles and annual salaries of every full-time person employed in Clinton’s Senate office between 2002 and 2008. Those data show the median salary for men and women to be the same at $40,000. The data also show Clinton hired roughly twice as many women as men.

Are you a liar or stupid?

I'm no mathematician but 92 cents is less than a dollar.

You didn't read the whole thing. Cherry picking is not a good color on you.

 

[sealybobo]

That's right. If they pay their women only 70% of what they pay men, they might work for Hillary Clinton.

Hey look another Republican lying about Hillary

According to the 2008 salaries provided by the Clinton campaign — which, again, includes anyone who even worked part of the year — the median salary for women was $39,500, while the median for men was $43,000. That works out roughly to women making 92 cents for every dollar earned by men. (In other years, it was the opposite — but as we noted earlier, the median for all seven years combined showed median salaries to be the same.)

Gender Pay Gap in Clinton's Senate Office? - FactCheck.org

RNC chairman Reince Priebus based his claim on a report by the Washington Free Beacon

Fake news anyone?

Pushing back against that analysis, the Clinton campaign provided FactCheck.org a list of the names, titles and annual salaries of every full-time person employed in Clinton’s Senate office between 2002 and 2008. Those data show the median salary for men and women to be the same at $40,000. The data also show Clinton hired roughly twice as many women as men.

Are you a liar or stupid?

If she's so much for women, why aren't those numbers exactly the same, or even skewed for women?

So all you did was post another link showing she doesn't pay women the same as men?

How many links do we need to prove me right?

Again you didn't read the entire thing.

.....difficult to use to track salaries because Senate staffers often toggle between Senate and campaign work. That churn was particularly true on Clinton’s staff, he said, because she was running for president in 2007 and 2008. For that reason, he believes the Clinton campaign methodology provides a more accurate measure of her record on pay equity.

Oh and Using the right wing methodology, the Free Beacon found the median annual salary for women working in Clinton’s office was $40,791, and it was $56,500 for men. The Free Beaconreporter who prepared the report, Brent Scher, declined to provide us with the raw data from his analysis to compare with the data from the Clinton campaign.

The Clinton campaign doesn’t dispute the accuracy of the Free Beacon data, but it argues the data and methodology lead to a misleading conclusion.

“The Free Beacon based their analysis off an incomplete, and therefore inaccurate set of numbers,” said Josh Schwerin, a spokesman for the Clinton campaign. “The fact is, Hillary paid full-time men and women equally.”

Schwerin provided FactCheck.org a list of the name, gender, title and annual salary of every full-time person employed in Clinton’s Senate office between 2002 and 2008. Notably, the Clinton campaign’s figures show the annual salaries of employees regardless of how long they worked in any given year. So if a woman was hired at an annual salary of $50,000 but only worked part of the year (and therefore earned some fraction of that $50,000), the Clinton data would include that salary in the women’s salary column. The Free Beaconreport would not have included that employee at all. The Clinton campaign data also include employees who may have taken a brief leave of absence (sometimes to work for Clinton’s 2008 presidential campaign). Because they did not work the entire fiscal year, they were not included in the Free Beacon report.

Taking out Hillary Clinton’s salary — we didn’t think it was fair to include her since she didn’t hire herself — the median annual salary for both men and women, regardless of how much of the year they worked, was identical: $40,000.

So are you stupid or a liar or a stupid liar?

 

[sealybobo]

The Clinton campaign debunked this bullshit just like Obama debunked the birthers but how many of you still believe Obama wasn't born in America? Any other further discussion will just be met with laughter.

 

[ThunderKiss1965]

That's right. If they pay their women only 70% of what they pay men, they might work for Hillary Clinton.

Hey look another Republican lying about Hillary

According to the 2008 salaries provided by the Clinton campaign — which, again, includes anyone who even worked part of the year — the median salary for women was $39,500, while the median for men was $43,000. That works out roughly to women making 92 cents for every dollar earned by men. (In other years, it was the opposite — but as we noted earlier, the median for all seven years combined showed median salaries to be the same.)

Gender Pay Gap in Clinton's Senate Office? - FactCheck.org

RNC chairman Reince Priebus based his claim on a report by the Washington Free Beacon

Fake news anyone?

Pushing back against that analysis, the Clinton campaign provided FactCheck.org a list of the names, titles and annual salaries of every full-time person employed in Clinton’s Senate office between 2002 and 2008. Those data show the median salary for men and women to be the same at $40,000. The data also show Clinton hired roughly twice as many women as men.

Are you a liar or stupid?

I'm no mathematician but 92 cents is less than a dollar.

You didn't read the whole thing. Cherry picking is not a good color on you.

And math doesn't seem to be your strong suit. The article is about the supposed pay gap and stated that the Clinton campaign paid women 92 cent for every dollar the men made so ...

 

[ThunderKiss1965]

One of the experts on tv today was talking about who you need to worry about committing these mass shootings, are those that talk about guns ALL the time.

So all those who constantly talk about banning guns are going to start killing people ? That's weird.

No. It's those that are constantly talking about pr-guns, writing stories about guns, drawing pictures of guns, bragging about their gun collection, buying t-shirts and other stuff depicting guns... etc.

Which is a direct response to the loons threatening Constitutional rights.

 

[Lewdog]

One of the experts on tv today was talking about who you need to worry about committing these mass shootings, are those that talk about guns ALL the time.

So all those who constantly talk about banning guns are going to start killing people ? That's weird.

No. It's those that are constantly talking about pr-guns, writing stories about guns, drawing pictures of guns, bragging about their gun collection, buying t-shirts and other stuff depicting guns... etc.

Which is a direct response to the loons threatening Constitutional rights.

No it's not. It's about people taking advantage of the situation to make an extra buck at the expense to people that are frothed up in a fervor.

 

[Aba Incieni]

One of the experts on tv today was talking about who you need to worry about committing these mass shootings, are those that talk about guns ALL the time.

So all those who constantly talk about banning guns are going to start killing people ? That's weird.

No. It's those that are constantly talking about pr-guns, writing stories about guns, drawing pictures of guns, bragging about their gun collection, buying t-shirts and other stuff depicting guns... etc.

Which is a direct response to the loons threatening Constitutional rights.

No it's not. It's about people taking advantage of the situation to make an extra buck at the expense to people that are frothed up in a fervor.

You mean like sky screamers. They've gone wonky ever since November of '18.

 

[ThunderKiss1965]

One of the experts on tv today was talking about who you need to worry about committing these mass shootings, are those that talk about guns ALL the time.

So all those who constantly talk about banning guns are going to start killing people ? That's weird.

No. It's those that are constantly talking about pr-guns, writing stories about guns, drawing pictures of guns, bragging about their gun collection, buying t-shirts and other stuff depicting guns... etc.

Which is a direct response to the loons threatening Constitutional rights.

No it's not. It's about people taking advantage of the situation to make an extra buck at the expense to people that are frothed up in a fervor.

Yeah those pesky Constitutional rights sure do stir up a lot of trouble. Those of us who want to keep them and those who want to take them away.

 

[Lewdog]

One of the experts on tv today was talking about who you need to worry about committing these mass shootings, are those that talk about guns ALL the time.

So all those who constantly talk about banning guns are going to start killing people ? That's weird.

No. It's those that are constantly talking about pr-guns, writing stories about guns, drawing pictures of guns, bragging about their gun collection, buying t-shirts and other stuff depicting guns... etc.

Which is a direct response to the loons threatening Constitutional rights.

No it's not. It's about people taking advantage of the situation to make an extra buck at the expense to people that are frothed up in a fervor.

Yeah those pesky Constitutional rights sure do stir up a lot of trouble. Those of us who want to keep them and those who want to take them away.

I'm not going to continue to argue this with you. It's obvious neither of us are going to change our opinions.

The Constitution also allows for it to be amended.