#FamilyIsEverything!

[ding]

We must not forbid women to control their own bodies. We must also not forbid accurate information. Abortion is a terrible solution and mostly avoidable. Forcing a woman to have a baby is worse.

There, the complete post, unedited for distortion.

Why do you believe Margaret Sanger wouldn’t allow abortions in her clinic?

Which one do you believe she thought was worse?

And she was a woman.

 

[there4eyeM]

It is disqualifyingly hypocritical for one who pays taxes to a government that makes decisions of life and death all over the world to criticize a woman who has to make a choice.

 

[ding]

It is disqualifyingly hypocritical for one who pays taxes to a government that makes decisions of life and death all over the world to criticize a woman who has to make a choice.

Are you arguing two wrongs make a right?

 

[there4eyeM]

Hypocrisy neutralizes argumentation.
Lack of wisdom nullifies learning.

 

[Vastator]

It is disqualifyingly hypocritical for one who pays taxes to a government that makes decisions of life and death all over the world to criticize a woman who has to make a choice.

Once again, you belittle women, and deny them agency. They do not "HAVE" to make a choice. They already willingly made it when they spread their legs. Quit trying to turn free people into victims in order to justify their willing decision to kill their offspring, in trade for the promise of a better life for themselves...

 

[there4eyeM]

Belittling women is impossible. They can not be made "little". One may say things that display a disparaging attitude towards men's sisters, but that sex is indomitable, invincible and able. What and who would disable them is an enemy.

 

[Moonglow]

Family is not important thing. It's everything..

​

Why sure, it usually takes more than one to support theft..

 

[BreezeWood]

It is disqualifyingly hypocritical for one who pays taxes to a government that makes decisions of life and death all over the world to criticize a woman who has to make a choice.

Once again, you belittle women, and deny them agency. They do not "HAVE" to make a choice. They already willingly made it when they spread their legs. Quit trying to turn free people into victims in order to justify their willing decision to kill their offspring, in trade for the promise of a better life for themselves...

.

They already willingly made it when they spread their legs

willingly ... made it

no, they do not physiologically make that decision, it is out of their physical control to manifest the desired outcome but willingly do so by their intent and have done so for centuries. and modern medicine makes it a practicality woman do consider in their daily lives.

 

[Vastator]

It is disqualifyingly hypocritical for one who pays taxes to a government that makes decisions of life and death all over the world to criticize a woman who has to make a choice.

Once again, you belittle women, and deny them agency. They do not "HAVE" to make a choice. They already willingly made it when they spread their legs. Quit trying to turn free people into victims in order to justify their willing decision to kill their offspring, in trade for the promise of a better life for themselves...

.

They already willingly made it when they spread their legs

willingly ... made it

no, they do not physiologically make that decision, it is out of their physical control to manifest the desired outcome but willingly do so by their intent and have done so for centuries. and modern medicine makes it a practicality woman do consider in their daily lives.

Unless raped, they were willing. And the consequence of sex is known. That's what sex is for.

 

[BreezeWood]

It is disqualifyingly hypocritical for one who pays taxes to a government that makes decisions of life and death all over the world to criticize a woman who has to make a choice.

Once again, you belittle women, and deny them agency. They do not "HAVE" to make a choice. They already willingly made it when they spread their legs. Quit trying to turn free people into victims in order to justify their willing decision to kill their offspring, in trade for the promise of a better life for themselves...

.

They already willingly made it when they spread their legs

willingly ... made it

no, they do not physiologically make that decision, it is out of their physical control to manifest the desired outcome but willingly do so by their intent and have done so for centuries. and modern medicine makes it a practicality woman do consider in their daily lives.

Unless raped, they were willing. And the consequence of sex is known. That's what sex is for.

.

That's what sex is for.

That's what sex is for ...

that is not true, then or the outcome is multiplistic -

sex for you vastator is eating a hamburger at mcdonalds ... and not complaining about it.

 

[Vastator]

It is disqualifyingly hypocritical for one who pays taxes to a government that makes decisions of life and death all over the world to criticize a woman who has to make a choice.

Once again, you belittle women, and deny them agency. They do not "HAVE" to make a choice. They already willingly made it when they spread their legs. Quit trying to turn free people into victims in order to justify their willing decision to kill their offspring, in trade for the promise of a better life for themselves...

.

They already willingly made it when they spread their legs

willingly ... made it

no, they do not physiologically make that decision, it is out of their physical control to manifest the desired outcome but willingly do so by their intent and have done so for centuries. and modern medicine makes it a practicality woman do consider in their daily lives.

Unless raped, they were willing. And the consequence of sex is known. That's what sex is for.

.

That's what sex is for.

That's what sex is for ...

that is not true, then or the outcome is multiplistic -

View attachment 234805

sex for you vastator is eating a hamburger at mcdonalds ... and not complaining about it.

If that was supposed to make sense I must confess... I'm primarily an English speaker.

 

[AVG-JOE]

The hypocrisy of talking and acting as if we, in society, are not constantly making choices that result some living and some not reveals the nature of those who oppose a woman's right to something so intimate.
Abortion is the worst form of birth control.
Repression of women represents the worst of human society.
Fully informed women would doubtlessly result in fewer abortions.
Fully informed societies would result in fewer wars and less violence.
What we need to be arguing for is more important that what some are arguing against.

Education, education, education.

The keys are right there...

Grab the keys, Monkeys. Grab the keys and fly!

`​

 

[AVG-JOE]

Forcing a woman to have a baby is worse.

No one forces a woman to have a baby. Such a statement is belittling to women. Their pregnancy is a result of a decision they made. To suggest that someone has forced them; is to remove agency from these women, suggesting that they have no control over their own actions; like animals. Quite derogatory, really...

We must not forbid women to control their own bodies. We must also not forbid accurate information. Abortion is a terrible solution and mostly avoidable. Forcing a woman to have a baby is worse.

There, the complete post, unedited for distortion.

Your last line is the turd in the punchbowl. And pretty much dismisses the previous contribution. You said it. You own it...

For what it's worth, doing what you did to the quoted text here is technically a no-no. The correct way to post what you wanted would have been to highlight the line you were responding to.

 

[AVG-JOE]

It is disqualifyingly hypocritical for one who pays taxes to a government that makes decisions of life and death all over the world to criticize a woman who has to make a choice.

Once again, you belittle women, and deny them agency. They do not "HAVE" to make a choice. They already willingly made it when they spread their legs. Quit trying to turn free people into victims in order to justify their willing decision to kill their offspring, in trade for the promise of a better life for themselves...

.

They already willingly made it when they spread their legs

willingly ... made it

no, they do not physiologically make that decision, it is out of their physical control to manifest the desired outcome but willingly do so by their intent and have done so for centuries. and modern medicine makes it a practicality woman do consider in their daily lives.

Unless raped, they were willing. And the consequence of sex is known. That's what sex is for.

See Dude... That's where you and your high horse are just plain wrong.

As evidenced by the profitability of the American Abortion Industry, there simply must be a plethora of clueless people out there teaching themselves how to **** by trial and error.

Education. Education. Education...

Y'all know the drill.

​

 

[AVG-JOE]

You aren't all bad for a talking monkey, but then again you aren't all good for a talking monkey either.

I'm not a talking monkey.

I'm a talking dog.

I talk and the Monkey types.

And damned if I didn't get stuck with a slow one!

​

 

[Vastator]

Forcing a woman to have a baby is worse.

No one forces a woman to have a baby. Such a statement is belittling to women. Their pregnancy is a result of a decision they made. To suggest that someone has forced them; is to remove agency from these women, suggesting that they have no control over their own actions; like animals. Quite derogatory, really...

We must not forbid women to control their own bodies. We must also not forbid accurate information. Abortion is a terrible solution and mostly avoidable. Forcing a woman to have a baby is worse.

There, the complete post, unedited for distortion.

Your last line is the turd in the punchbowl. And pretty much dismisses the previous contribution. You said it. You own it...

For what it's worth, doing what you did to the quoted text here is technically a no-no. The correct way to post what you wanted would have been to highlight the line you were responding to.

For what it's worth... I quoted you. And offered specifically the quote to which I was referring. Deal with it. Your words weren't misrepresented, or altered.

 

[Vastator]

It is disqualifyingly hypocritical for one who pays taxes to a government that makes decisions of life and death all over the world to criticize a woman who has to make a choice.

Once again, you belittle women, and deny them agency. They do not "HAVE" to make a choice. They already willingly made it when they spread their legs. Quit trying to turn free people into victims in order to justify their willing decision to kill their offspring, in trade for the promise of a better life for themselves...

.

They already willingly made it when they spread their legs

willingly ... made it

no, they do not physiologically make that decision, it is out of their physical control to manifest the desired outcome but willingly do so by their intent and have done so for centuries. and modern medicine makes it a practicality woman do consider in their daily lives.

Unless raped, they were willing. And the consequence of sex is known. That's what sex is for.

See Dude... That's where you and your high horse are just plain wrong.

As evidenced by the profitability of the American Abortion Industry, there simply must be a plethora of clueless people out there teaching themselves how to **** by trial and error.

Education. Education. Education...

Y'all know the drill.

​

"Must be, eh? Riiiight! Just gotta be, cuz if not... The point you thought you were making rings hollow....

 

[AVG-JOE]

Forcing a woman to have a baby is worse.

No one forces a woman to have a baby. Such a statement is belittling to women. Their pregnancy is a result of a decision they made. To suggest that someone has forced them; is to remove agency from these women, suggesting that they have no control over their own actions; like animals. Quite derogatory, really...

We must not forbid women to control their own bodies. We must also not forbid accurate information. Abortion is a terrible solution and mostly avoidable. Forcing a woman to have a baby is worse.

There, the complete post, unedited for distortion.

Your last line is the turd in the punchbowl. And pretty much dismisses the previous contribution. You said it. You own it...

For what it's worth, doing what you did to the quoted text here is technically a no-no. The correct way to post what you wanted would have been to highlight the line you were responding to.

For what it's worth... I quoted you. And offered specifically the quote to which I was referring. Deal with it. Your words weren't misrepresented, or altered.

Um... No. You quoted there4eyeM and edited his post in such a way that it altered the context of his words.

My role in this is as a USMB Moderator taking a short time out for a coaching moment.

Savvy?

 

[Vastator]

Forcing a woman to have a baby is worse.

No one forces a woman to have a baby. Such a statement is belittling to women. Their pregnancy is a result of a decision they made. To suggest that someone has forced them; is to remove agency from these women, suggesting that they have no control over their own actions; like animals. Quite derogatory, really...

We must not forbid women to control their own bodies. We must also not forbid accurate information. Abortion is a terrible solution and mostly avoidable. Forcing a woman to have a baby is worse.

There, the complete post, unedited for distortion.

Your last line is the turd in the punchbowl. And pretty much dismisses the previous contribution. You said it. You own it...

For what it's worth, doing what you did to the quoted text here is technically a no-no. The correct way to post what you wanted would have been to highlight the line you were responding to.

For what it's worth... I quoted you. And offered specifically the quote to which I was referring. Deal with it. Your words weren't misrepresented, or altered.

Um... No. You quoted there4eyeM and edited his post in such a way that it altered the context of his words.

My role in this is as a USMB Moderator taking a short time out for a coaching moment.

Savvy?

I see what you're looking for...

 

[AVG-JOE]

It is disqualifyingly hypocritical for one who pays taxes to a government that makes decisions of life and death all over the world to criticize a woman who has to make a choice.

Once again, you belittle women, and deny them agency. They do not "HAVE" to make a choice. They already willingly made it when they spread their legs. Quit trying to turn free people into victims in order to justify their willing decision to kill their offspring, in trade for the promise of a better life for themselves...

.

They already willingly made it when they spread their legs

willingly ... made it

no, they do not physiologically make that decision, it is out of their physical control to manifest the desired outcome but willingly do so by their intent and have done so for centuries. and modern medicine makes it a practicality woman do consider in their daily lives.

Unless raped, they were willing. And the consequence of sex is known. That's what sex is for.

See Dude... That's where you and your high horse are just plain wrong.

As evidenced by the profitability of the American Abortion Industry, there simply must be a plethora of clueless people out there teaching themselves how to **** by trial and error.

Education. Education. Education...

Y'all know the drill.

​

"Must be, eh? Riiiight! Just gotta be, cuz if not... The point you thought you were making rings hollow....

How so? If that's true, then all of the political whining done about the abortion industry is just so much political whining.

Either the American Abortion Industry is an embarrassment or it's not. If it is it MUST be a testament to the lack of education OR the stupidity of America's youth and I simply refuse to believe that there are enough Americans who're so stupid as to float the profits to be found in the abortion racket, in spite of having a high school education.

The only conclusion is that sex education is NOT being taught effectively in the USA.