Fake Claims About Dominion Voting Systems

[meaner gene]

They haven't said one single word inside a courtroom. They've filed a few SLAPP suits. That's all.

SLAPP Suits

A SLAPP suit seeks to use the courts to silence someone who has exercised First Amendment rights and deter others from similar speech.

mtsu.edu

Their lawsuits were for defamation (libel/slander) a civil tort.
They filed hundred page complaints which included hundreds of supporting exhibits. So their full case, having been filed in federal court is a matter of public record.

 

[Polishprince]

Considering the Fact that Dominion is a government contractor, whose very profits are leeched from the beleaguered taxpayers, don't you think that they SHOULD be making a public accounting of the work they are accepting money for?

The states legislatures can bring dominion before them. Why do you insist disputes be made in the court of public opinion, and not in the courts or legislatures responsible.

As long as the State Legislators are using their own money, they can go right ahead.

But around here, in Pennsylvania, they use taxes extricated from the fixed incomes of WW2 widows and other taxpayers. So, sure, they have a responsibility to the public.

 

[jc456]

I'd love to see a Dominion rep come on tv and discuss their company and product. But no one will ever see that.

Dominion doesn't grandstand. They did their talking in two federal lawsuits defending their reputation. Filed in federal district court, washington DC. They do their talking inside the courtroom, not on the courtroom steps.

Why’d their test fail?

 

[jc456]

Not 2020, ballots went out that weren’t requested. No chain of custody.

Mail-in ballots have the same chain of custody as absentee ballots do. Which Trump said were legitimate. And his preferred method of voting.

No they don’t sheeple

 

[meaner gene]

The states legislatures can bring dominion before them. Why do you insist disputes be made in the court of public opinion, and not in the courts or legislatures responsible.

As long as the State Legislators are using their own money, they can go right ahead.

You know the legislature doesn't have any money. They spend the money they get from the taxpayers.

But around here, in Pennsylvania, they use taxes extricated from the fixed incomes of WW2 widows and other taxpayers. So, sure, they have a responsibility to the public.

They did not contract with the public, they contracted with the elected governments of Pennsylvania.
And the USSC long ago ruled, that being a taxpayer doesn't give you standing in objecting to government spending, no matter how wasteful, or onerous.

So you can stop saying the public has a right. The legislature has a right, and if the public doesn't agree with how the legislature exercises that right, they can vote them out.

That's the way democracy works.

 

[meaner gene]

Why’d their test fail?

Citation?

 

[meaner gene]

Mail-in ballots have the same chain of custody as absentee ballots do. Which Trump said were legitimate. And his preferred method of voting.

No they don’t sheeple

All ballots sent by mail, have the same exact chain of custody.

 

[jc456]

Mail-in ballots have the same chain of custody as absentee ballots do. Which Trump said were legitimate. And his preferred method of voting.

No they don’t sheeple

All ballots sent by mail, have the same exact chain of custody.

Nope. Thanks for showing all your stupid

 

[Polishprince]

So you can stop saying the public has a right. The legislature has a right, and if the public doesn't agree with how the legislature exercises that right, they can vote them out.

That's the way democracy works.

Maybe we CAN'T vote them out?

After all, its not who votes that matters, but who counts the votes.

And that's the job of Dominion.

So unless they provide answers to the people, there is no reason to think they would cut their own throats by allowing their patrons to be voted out.

 

[jc456]

So you can stop saying the public has a right. The legislature has a right, and if the public doesn't agree with how the legislature exercises that right, they can vote them out.

That's the way democracy works.

Maybe we CAN'T vote them out?

After all, its not who votes that matters, but who counts the votes.

And that's the job of Dominion.

So unless they provide answers to the people, there is no reason to think they would cut their own throats by allowing their patrons to be voted out.

Well said

 

[Lastamender]

I doubt a single accusation about Dominion from the Trump cult is true. Most of them are utterly bizarre.

He's the CEO

​

Accurate, transparent and accessible elections—this is the objective that motivated me to create Dominion Voting Systems 18 years ago in Canada. From the start, the company was focused on improving paper-based voting, and it continues to pursue vote-tabulation solutions that enhance accuracy and transparency through audits and reviews, as well as by allowing voters to create, verify and privately cast a marked paper ballot. But if you’ve heard about our role in the U.S. election on Twitter, it’s likely you’ve heard something different.​

​

The allegations against Dominion are bizarre, but I’ll set the record straight. Dominion is an American company, now headquartered in Denver. Dominion is not and has never been a front for communists. It has no ties to Hugo Chávez, the late dictator of Venezuela. It has never been involved in Venezuelan elections. None of Dominion’s systems use the Smartmatic software that has come under attack, as any state certification lab could verify.​

There is no secret “vote flipping” algorithm. Third-party test labs, chosen by the bipartisan Election Assistance Commission and accredited by the National Institute of Standards and Technology, perform complete source-code reviews on every federally certified tabulation system. States replicate this process for their own certifications. Postelection canvassing and auditing also exist to provide additional assurance of the vote totals’ accuracy.​

The part of the election process on which Dominion focuses is highly regulated and certified. ... Dominion voting machines do one thing: accurately tabulate votes from county-verified voters using a durable paper ballot controlled and secured by local elections officials. ...​

​

Unlike its critics, Dominion has had to attest to every part of its business ownership and operations to governmental agencies and in courts—under oath and penalty of perjury. We believe it is important to welcome the highest degree of scrutiny and transparency in the election process. This builds trust and leads to more resilient and robust elections. The widespread disinformation campaign America currently faces, however, does the opposite. Baseless and ludicrous smears are presented without evidence and amplified across social media.​

Opinion | Fake Claims About Dominion Voting Systems Do Real Damage

Our machines have no secret ‘vote flipping’ algorithm. We have no ties to dictator Hugo Chávez.

www.wsj.com

We have a President who traffics in bizarre conspiracy theories, a coterie of liars, thieves, and grifters who indulge him, and a base so emotional and irrational that they believe what he says, no matter how outlandish.

That is why your article says "opinion". That opinion is wrong. But until the machines are released for forensic audits by independent auditors we will never know.

 

[Eric Arthur Blair]

Their lawsuits were for defamation (libel/slander) a civil tort.
They filed hundred page complaints which included hundreds of supporting exhibits. So their full case, having been filed in federal court is a matter of public record.

You aren't telling me anything new. All the law suits filed in federal and state court by Trump lawyers also had ample supporting documentation. Hopefully they will get a fair shake this time and have their cases presented
before being shot down preemptively by biased judges who won't even let their side be heard.

 

[Seawytch]

Mail-in ballots have the same chain of custody as absentee ballots do. Which Trump said were legitimate. And his preferred method of voting.

No they don’t sheeple

All ballots sent by mail, have the same exact chain of custody.

Nope. Thanks for showing all your stupid

You are the only one displaying ignorance. The only difference between an absentee ballot and a vote by mail ballot is that you have to have a reason for requesting the absentee ballot. Oh, by the way, absentee ballot states are a minority. There are only six states that require a reason to vote by mail.

 

[jc456]

Mail-in ballots have the same chain of custody as absentee ballots do. Which Trump said were legitimate. And his preferred method of voting.

No they don’t sheeple

All ballots sent by mail, have the same exact chain of custody.

Nope. Thanks for showing all your stupid

You are the only one displaying ignorance. The only difference between an absentee ballot and a vote by mail ballot is that you have to have a reason for requesting the absentee ballot. Oh, by the way, absentee ballot states are a minority. There are only six states that require a reason to vote by mail.

Thanks for that show of stupid your own statement says the difference and why a difference in chain of custody. See, if one doesn’t request one, then one doesn’t know one is coming and anyone can use it.

 

[Seawytch]

Mail-in ballots have the same chain of custody as absentee ballots do. Which Trump said were legitimate. And his preferred method of voting.

No they don’t sheeple

All ballots sent by mail, have the same exact chain of custody.

Nope. Thanks for showing all your stupid

You are the only one displaying ignorance. The only difference between an absentee ballot and a vote by mail ballot is that you have to have a reason for requesting the absentee ballot. Oh, by the way, absentee ballot states are a minority. There are only six states that require a reason to vote by mail.

Thanks for that show of stupid your own statement says the difference and why a difference in chain of custody. See, if one doesn’t request one, then one doesn’t know one is coming and anyone can use it.

I didn't say it wasn't requested, I said you don't have to have a reason for requesting it. The chain of custody remains the same regardless. Election Office, to mail, to voter, to mail or dropbox, to election office. Same/same.

 

[jc456]

Mail-in ballots have the same chain of custody as absentee ballots do. Which Trump said were legitimate. And his preferred method of voting.

No they don’t sheeple

All ballots sent by mail, have the same exact chain of custody.

Nope. Thanks for showing all your stupid

You are the only one displaying ignorance. The only difference between an absentee ballot and a vote by mail ballot is that you have to have a reason for requesting the absentee ballot. Oh, by the way, absentee ballot states are a minority. There are only six states that require a reason to vote by mail.

Thanks for that show of stupid your own statement says the difference and why a difference in chain of custody. See, if one doesn’t request one, then one doesn’t know one is coming and anyone can use it.

I didn't say it wasn't requested, I said you don't have to have a reason for requesting it. The chain of custody remains the same regardless. Election Office, to mail, to voter, to mail or dropbox, to election office. Same/same.

Nope . If one doesn’t request one, one doesn’t know one didn’t come when it’s stolen or used by another. Absentee ballots are requested dumb ass.
The chain starts with the request.

hey stupid, learn what chain of custody is

 

[meaner gene]

... and if the public doesn't agree with how the legislature exercises that right, they can vote them out.

That's the way democracy works.

Maybe we CAN'T vote them out?

After all, its not who votes that matters, but who counts the votes.

And that's the job of Dominion.

The public has the right to observe, oversee, and raise objections to irregularities in the vote.

Of course, that requires evidence of actual errors or wrong doings, and not just claiming they won because they cheated.

 

[Lastamender]

... and if the public doesn't agree with how the legislature exercises that right, they can vote them out.

That's the way democracy works.

Maybe we CAN'T vote them out?

After all, its not who votes that matters, but who counts the votes.

And that's the job of Dominion.

The public has the right to observe, oversee, and raise objections to irregularities in the vote.

Of course, that requires evidence of actual errors or wrong doings, and not just claiming they won because they cheated.

Here is the Evidence

Crowdsourcing evidence for journalists.

hereistheevidence.com

 

[meaner gene]

You aren't telling me anything new. All the law suits filed in federal and state court by Trump lawyers also had ample supporting documentation. Hopefully they will get a fair shake this time and have their cases presented
before being shot down preemptively by biased judges who won't even let their side be heard.

Actually scores of judges, from state to federal to the supreme court to judges Trump personally appointed, all said your claim: All the law suits filed in federal and state court by Trump lawyers also had ample supporting documentation.

Was false.

 

[jc456]

... and if the public doesn't agree with how the legislature exercises that right, they can vote them out.

That's the way democracy works.

Maybe we CAN'T vote them out?

After all, its not who votes that matters, but who counts the votes.

And that's the job of Dominion.

The public has the right to observe, oversee, and raise objections to irregularities in the vote.

Of course, that requires evidence of actual errors or wrong doings, and not just claiming they won because they cheated.

And judges who follow the constitution.

speaking of constitution, only a state legislature can change federal voting rules. There’s that fraud, and again judges ignoring rule of law.

that shouts FRAUD.

maybe why half the country is mad