odanny
Diamond Member
- Thread starter
- #21
There is nothing inaccurate in the opening sentence.Might as well stop reading there. When you see a sentence like that, you can pretty safely assume that the entire article is going to consist of similar bullshit.
Skimming over the whole article, it appears that the intent is to attack both the right to keep and bear arms, and also Christianity in general.
Even by New York Times standards, this is an extraordinarily bullshitty article.