- Thread starter
- #41
Like fact checking the Babylon Bee?Go to factcheck.org and poke around, I posted two links already. Their sourced material is often quotes or videos or direct references to the issues at hand.I agree that fact checking sites can be a useful resource, but I strongly disagree with calling them "fact checking" sites. Every one that I visit needs to be vetted without using the sources that they cite. Assembling facts into politically motivated narratives is cheating, scamming, and dishonest when it is called "fact checking".Which is why I mentioned the fact the most fact checkers lay out their sources and that’s why they are useful. You don’t need to trust their conclusions or commentary, but they are useful for finding source materialFact checking sites can be used in the search for the truth, but one should be aware that "fact checking" is a dishonest euphemism for fact spinning, and that it is lefty biased. There is nothing wrong with using biased media from either side, but one should understand what they are looking at. Facts can easily be assembled into false narratives that can be "fact checked", and this is why there is such a large "fact checking" industry.
Biden Hasn't Suspended In-Person Campaigning - FactCheck.org
A false claim on social media suggests former Vice President Joe Biden has stopped all in-person campaigning until the election. He has plans to visit several states before Nov. 3.
www.factcheck.org