Facebook Changes Content Moderation Rules

What do you know. Facebook is changing to be more like X. They also admit, again, that they were political pressured in the past (4 years) to restrict content. They are also moving the content moderation dept. from CA to Texas to escape politicization.

Meta’s newly appointed Chief of Global Affairs Joel Kaplan told Fox on Tuesday that Meta’s partnerships with third-party fact checkers were “well intentioned at the outset but there’s just been too much political bias in what they choose to fact check and how.”
Kaplan said that there’s “no question that there has been a change over the last four years. We saw a lot of societal and political pressure, all in the direction of more content, moderation more censorship, and we’ve got a real opportunity. Now we’ve got a new administration, and a new president coming in who are big defenders of free expression, and that makes a difference.


A CNN link to make lefties happy.

https://edition.cnn.com/2025/01/07/tech/meta-censorship-moderation/index.html
 
You loons are losing the power to control the narrative and I LOVE IT!!!
I for one encourage you morons to reject facts for community notes..... :lol: Your people don't need facts. Have no use for them. Better to huddle together and decide amongst yourselves whether we landed on the moon, if aliens shot JFK, or if it was Clinton and the Ukranians who stole 2020 from Trump. :lol:
 
I don’t do Facebook, but at least they are moving in the right direction. Caving into censorship pushed by the far-left was never a good thing.

But you have no problem with Musk censoring X for ideological reasons.
 
Now that we know ivermectin does help with covid. The truth comes out, you loons denied that a d killed thousands with you misinformation.


Other examples are ivermectin, hydroxychloroquine or chloroquine.

Claims that ivermectin, hydroxychloroquine or chloroquine can treat COVID-19 are false. These medicines are still useful for treating other illness. But only medicines approved or authorized by the FDA to treat COVID-19 are useful for that illness.

Ivermectin treats or prevents parasites in animals and in humans, not viruses. Taking large doses of this drug can cause serious harm.
 
I for one encourage you morons to reject facts for community notes..... :lol: Your people don't need facts. Have no use for them. Better to huddle together and decide amongst yourselves whether we landed on the moon, if aliens shot JFK, or if it was Clinton and the Ukranians who stole 2020 from Trump. :lol:
Fact is Biden was losing his mind for years now. Even though you loons said he wasn't. That kind of facts you believe?
 

Other examples are ivermectin, hydroxychloroquine or chloroquine.

Claims that ivermectin, hydroxychloroquine or chloroquine can treat COVID-19 are false. These medicines are still useful for treating other illness. But only medicines approved or authorized by the FDA to treat COVID-19 are useful for that illness.

Ivermectin treats or prevents parasites in animals and in humans, not viruses. Taking large doses of this drug can cause serious harm.
Not what the FDA said.
 
Fact is Biden was losing his mind for years now. Even though you loons said he wasn't. That kind of facts you believe?
Trump is older than Biden was

He doesn’t look so well
 
Trump can answer questions without making a fool of himself.
🤣

He talks like a seven year old.

“No, I can’t assure you on either of those two,” he said in response to a question about the two territories, one controlled by Denmark and the other by Panama. “It might be that you’ll have to do something.”
 
Last edited:
But you have no problem with Musk censoring X for ideological reasons.

Did you have a problem with Facebook doing it? They were much more egregious in their censorship of Republicans and Trump than X has ever been towards Democrats.
 
What do you know. Facebook is changing to be more like X. They also admit, again, that they were political pressured in the past (4 years) to restrict content. They are also moving the content moderation dept. from CA to Texas to escape politicization.

Meta’s newly appointed Chief of Global Affairs Joel Kaplan told Fox on Tuesday that Meta’s partnerships with third-party fact checkers were “well intentioned at the outset but there’s just been too much political bias in what they choose to fact check and how.”
Kaplan said that there’s “no question that there has been a change over the last four years. We saw a lot of societal and political pressure, all in the direction of more content, moderation more censorship, and we’ve got a real opportunity. Now we’ve got a new administration, and a new president coming in who are big defenders of free expression, and that makes a difference.


A CNN link to make lefties happy.

https://edition.cnn.com/2025/01/07/tech/meta-censorship-moderation/index.html
They’re doing it to escape any responsibility for content.

So brave.
 
I don't really care what their motivation is.
True. All you care about is facilitating the spread of misinformation for the purposes of obtaining and keeping power.
 
True. All you care about is facilitating the spread of misinformation for the purposes of obtaining and keeping power.
Misinformation is subjective. Jason point, the Hunter laptop story was labeled misinformation and it clearly wasn't.
 
Back
Top Bottom