F-15 vs. AR-15? Bet on the Guys With the Guns

A
How many drones do you honestly think our nation has?

If you use them all up fighting an insurgency you will not have any to fight a foreign enemy. Also consider the act that drones are made in civilian factories by people who may be part of the uprising.
Your binary thinking will do you in before that happens.
The Drone Operators will get off duty and go home to find their Home burned to the Ground and their Wife , Mother In Law , Twin Toddlers , and dog dead in the smoldering ruin .
 
It’s a figure of speech. As if drones were the only asset available. :uhoh3:
It means you’re over matched.
We've seen how difficult it is to suppress an armed and determined citizenry, even with overwhelming force (see Viet Nam, Iraq, Korea). Americans wouldn't have to be able to defeat the entire Armed Forces, they would just have to make the cost of suppression too high to be sustainable. Add to that the likelihood that a good portion of the military arms would wind up in civilian hands and that cost would rapidly rise. Add again to that the reality that those arms are produced here in America by civilians and the very supply of those arms would be unsustainable. Yes, the resistance would be overmatched on paper, but in the long haul could overcome, and the retaliation would be huge. Pretty much all of Washington would be dead or run out of the country.
 
The Drone Operators will get off duty and go home to find their Home burned to the Ground and their Wife , Mother In Law , Twin Toddlers , and dog dead in the smoldering ruin .
It won't get to that point.
After enough politicians go home to find it burned to the ground, with their wife, mother in law, kids and dogs dead in the smouldering ruin, they will end the war.
 
A


The Drone Operators will get off duty and go home to find their Home burned to the Ground and their Wife , Mother In Law , Twin Toddlers , and dog dead in the smoldering ruin .
Like that doesn’t work both ways. :cuckoo:
You insurgents will be hunted by everyone.
 
We've seen how difficult it is to suppress an armed and determined citizenry, even with overwhelming force (see Viet Nam, Iraq, Korea). Americans wouldn't have to be able to defeat the entire Armed Forces, they would just have to make the cost of suppression too high to be sustainable. Add to that the likelihood that a good portion of the military arms would wind up in civilian hands and that cost would rapidly rise. Add again to that the reality that those arms are produced here in America by civilians and the very supply of those arms would be unsustainable. Yes, the resistance would be overmatched on paper, but in the long haul could overcome, and the retaliation would be huge. Pretty much all of Washington would be dead or run out of the country.
The second you dopes start killing innocents, the military will be against you. You’ll be hunted for the terrorists you are.
 
The second you dopes start killing innocents, the military will be against you. You’ll be hunted for the terrorists you are.
The second the military starts doing attack Runs with A10s on the Outskirts of Dallas and on downtown Omaha then NO ONE is innocent anymore .
 
We've seen how difficult it is to suppress an armed and determined citizenry, even with overwhelming force (see Viet Nam, Iraq, Korea). Americans wouldn't have to be able to defeat the entire Armed Forces, they would just have to make the cost of suppression too high to be sustainable. Add to that the likelihood that a good portion of the military arms would wind up in civilian hands and that cost would rapidly rise. Add again to that the reality that those arms are produced here in America by civilians and the very supply of those arms would be unsustainable. Yes, the resistance would be overmatched on paper, but in the long haul could overcome, and the retaliation would be huge. Pretty much all of Washington would be dead or run out of the country.
QFT the Marxists would be outed and turned over early on
 
No, I agree with you. In the end it takes boots on the ground and people in offices to rule. An armed citizenry would make it very difficult for a tyrant to be able to run a government.
Yes and no…..Japan illustrates what modern nuclear warfare does to change the battle field. We beat Japan by never invading their homeland and using small arms. . Now, rebuilding a nation is a different story. More deaths in every war come from artillery, air and sea power. Germany was defeated, not by small arms, but air power.

You guys have an insane idea that arming every citizen with an AR15 is going to stop a B52, ICBMs, nuclear subs and f22 s. A nation of armed citizens will all lay down their arms for food.
 

Forum List

Back
Top