‘Extremely disturbing and unethical’: new rules allow VA doctors to refuse to treat Democrats, unmarried veterans

Tommy Tainant

Diamond Member
Joined
Jan 20, 2016
Messages
58,046
Reaction score
26,763
Points
2,300
Location
Y Cae Ras

I just dnt understand how this can be legal in any way.
At the very least it must be a breach if contract When the first veteran challenges this in court then it all comes crashing down.
Pergaps trump doesnt understand what he signed ?
Fake News!
 
Wow - what a fake article.
Once again a left media takes a possibility, no matter how ridiculous and absurd it is - and creates a headline saying it is a clear fact.

If you glance past the paragraphs and paragraphs of horseshit you will see a comment - saying the ruling is a formality that removes a redundant ruling and that "every veteran will be welcome and receive care as always"
They hide that single sentence in a plethora of horseshit.

And Tommy Tainted falls for it - OF COURSE.
 

I just dnt understand how this can be legal in any way.
At the very least it must be a breach if contract When the first veteran challenges this in court then it all comes crashing down.
Pergaps trump doesnt understand what he signed ?
It seems all of this is coming from the Guardian.
Seems that it isn't a blanket, but may be for gender affirming care.
A bit misleading, but consider the source.

Nothing to see here folks, just move along.
 

I just dnt understand how this can be legal in any way.
At the very least it must be a breach if contract When the first veteran challenges this in court then it all comes crashing down.
Pergaps trump doesnt understand what he signed ?

No different than refusing to treat people who didn't take the magic shot.
 

I just dnt understand how this can be legal in any way.
At the very least it must be a breach if contract When the first veteran challenges this in court then it all comes crashing down.
Pergaps trump doesnt understand what he signed ?
looks like an opinion piece, and every link I've found uses the Guardian as it's source.

shame your 'article' isn't backed up.
 

I just dnt understand how this can be legal in any way.
At the very least it must be a breach if contract When the first veteran challenges this in court then it all comes crashing down.
Pergaps trump doesnt understand what he signed ?

Fake News!

That's a little unbelievable even for a UK rag mag

Lord HAW-HAW strikes again. He is a phony and propagandist, period, end of story.

And just in case you want to know why Tommy Two Tone is called Lord HAW-HAW by me, here is a little bit of who/whom HAW-HAW was, and as you can see Tommy fits the bill perfectly-)

 
looks like an opinion piece, and every link I've found uses the Guardian as it's source.

shame your 'article' isn't backed up.
The reich isnt denying it. I can accept that the old fool didnt know what he was doing but that is the danger of ruling by decree.
My guess is that it will end up costing the country more in the long run,
 
In an emailed response to questions, the VA press secretary, Peter Kasperowicz, did not dispute that the new rules allowed doctors to refuse to treat veteran patients based on their beliefs or that physicians could be dismissed based on their marital status or political affiliation, but said “all eligible veterans will always be welcome at VA and will always receive the benefits and services they’ve earned under the law”.

The outcomes are not difficult to work out. Even for magas.
 
In an emailed response to questions, the VA press secretary, Peter Kasperowicz, did not dispute that the new rules allowed doctors to refuse to treat veteran patients based on their beliefs or that physicians could be dismissed based on their marital status or political affiliation, but said “all eligible veterans will always be welcome at VA and will always receive the benefits and services they’ve earned under the law”.

The outcomes are not difficult to work out. Even for magas.
Another ignorant post by the Welsh Whiner.
 
In an emailed response to questions, the VA press secretary, Peter Kasperowicz, did not dispute that the new rules allowed doctors to refuse to treat veteran patients based on their beliefs or that physicians could be dismissed based on their marital status or political affiliation, but said “all eligible veterans will always be welcome at VA and will always receive the benefits and services they’ve earned under the law”.

The outcomes are not difficult to work out. Even for magas.
The outcomes are not difficult to work out.
you seem to be having trouble.

Guardian jumps to a wrong conclusion, half a dozen repeats their error, and you jump in with both feet.

this thread makes less sense than most of your others.
 
15th post
you seem to be having trouble.

Guardian jumps to a wrong conclusion, half a dozen repeats their error, and you jump in with both feet.

this thread makes less sense than most of your others.
WHich is why it belongs in conspiracy theories or rubber room.
It is no different than the liberal lies and gross exaggerations of "millions will die" by adding work requirements for Medicaid.
 
WHich is why it belongs in conspiracy theories or rubber room.
It is no different than the liberal lies and gross exaggerations of "millions will die" by adding work requirements for Medicaid.
WTF, TRUMP, TRUMP, TRUMP, TRUMP, TRUMP, ORANGE MAN BAD--that is the only thing democrats see in the title of any thread.
 

I just dnt understand how this can be legal in any way.
At the very least it must be a breach if contract When the first veteran challenges this in court then it all comes crashing down.
Pergaps trump doesnt understand what he signed ?

Hey I meant to ask did they do a NO KINGS protesting in the UK?
 
Back
Top Bottom