Explosives found in World Trade Center dust

[eots]

you have access to hundreds of clips of wtc 7.....link please !!!!

still waiting ollie

Silly little truthtards. They twist what is said and pretend that is the truth.

There are hundreds of clips from 9/11. None of the address an explosion at WTC 7 prior to the collapse.

please provide some evidence there are hundreds of individual clips of the collapse of wtc 7 or STFU

Now how about addressing SFC Ollie's point which is if there had been an explosion at WTC 7 prior to the collapses there would have been massive coverage of the event. Yet not one peep. Strange......

Yet another fact the truthtards will run away from!

THERE WERE MANY PEEPS...FROM EYEWITNESSES INSIDE THE BUILDING
AND FROM FIRST RESPONDERS ...BUT YOU WILL SOON CALL THEM LIARS
AS SOON AS YOU ARE PROVEN WRONG

 

[Patriot911]

still waiting ollie

please provide some evidence there are hundreds of individual clips of the collapse of wtc 7 or STFU

THERE WERE MANY PEEPS...FROM EYEWITNESSES INSIDE THE BUILDING
AND FROM FIRST RESPONDERS ...BUT YOU WILL SOON CALL THEM LIARS
AS SOON AS YOU ARE PROVEN WRONG

Awww..... poor eots has to resort to pretending he has many "peeps". You do realize not many people hold marshmallow chicks as credible witnesses, right? And fucked up retards like you don't have "peeps". You might have sychophants, but not peeps.

So tell us.... is the entire FDNY in on the conspiracy? Hundreds of firefighters were at Ground Zero and not ONE of them reported an explosion or anything else at WTC 7 until after the collapse. Hard to imagine a department that lost 300 people would be in on the conspiracy down to the last man. Well, hard for a normal, sane person. Truthtards imagine seriously fucked up shit like that all the time. Pathetic!

 

[Gamolon]

YouTube - MIT engineer and research scientist Jeff King: insight into what most likely happened that day

Three questions about the above video.

1. Squibs. Can you prove without a doubt that those were caused by explosives and not air pressure?

2. Why would they demolish the [perimeter columns? Those "squibs" originated at the perimeter columns.

3. Those red arrows are pointing to what? Column sections? I have news for you. That was the aluminum cladding coming off the perimeter columns.

No answer eots?

Typical.

 

[eots]

THERE WERE MANY PEEPS...FROM EYEWITNESSES INSIDE THE BUILDING
AND FROM FIRST RESPONDERS ...BUT YOU WILL SOON CALL THEM LIARS
AS SOON AS YOU ARE PROVEN WRONG

Awww..... poor eots has to resort to pretending he has many "peeps". You do realize not many people hold marshmallow chicks as credible witnesses, right? And fucked up retards like you don't have "peeps". You might have sychophants, but not peeps.

So tell us.... is the entire FDNY in on the conspiracy? Hundreds of firefighters were at Ground Zero and not ONE of them reported an explosion or anything else at WTC 7 until after the collapse. Hard to imagine a department that lost 300 people would be in on the conspiracy down to the last man. Well, hard for a normal, sane person. Truthtards imagine seriously fucked up shit like that all the time. Pathetic!

no one but you has said 3oo hundred firemen where in on it but you ninny and the fact remains there are first responders and people trapped in wtc 7 that report massive explosions

 

[SFC Ollie]

Awww..... poor eots has to resort to pretending he has many "peeps". You do realize not many people hold marshmallow chicks as credible witnesses, right? And fucked up retards like you don't have "peeps". You might have sychophants, but not peeps.

So tell us.... is the entire FDNY in on the conspiracy? Hundreds of firefighters were at Ground Zero and not ONE of them reported an explosion or anything else at WTC 7 until after the collapse. Hard to imagine a department that lost 300 people would be in on the conspiracy down to the last man. Well, hard for a normal, sane person. Truthtards imagine seriously fucked up shit like that all the time. Pathetic!

no one but you has said 3oo hundred firemen where in on it but you ninny and the fact remains there are first responders and people trapped in wtc 7 that report massive explosions

Yes, they were reporting things like the towers being hit by planes, the 2 towers falling, and debris from the one tower hitting WTC 7. Other explosions that morning were from Batterys, Car fuel tanks, Electrical transformers, Refrigerator compressors, Etc, Etc, Etc....... Hundreds of things that go boom when heat is applied....

 

[eots]

[ame=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_DuSeuxjiJQ]YouTube - Barry Jennings: WTC 7 (Explosions) Interview[/ame]

[ame=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=STbD9XMCOho]YouTube - The Elephant In The Room:Kevin McPadden, 9/11-1st Responder[/ame]

 

[SFC Ollie]

YouTube - Barry Jennings: WTC 7 (Explosions) Interview

YouTube - The Elephant In The Room:Kevin McPadden, 9/11-1st Responder

Eots, please tell us why there are no audio recordings of the explosions that Mr. McPadden is talking about.

 

[Patriot911]

no one but you has said 3oo hundred firemen where in on it but you ninny and the fact remains there are first responders and people trapped in wtc 7 that report massive explosions

Are you retarded? A massive explosion in WTC 7 before the collapse of either tower would have been known by EVERYONE at ground zero. You can't keep shit like that quiet unless everyone is in on it. Come on. You pretend you're smart. Time to man up and realize the ridiculousness of your position. But then again, I know you will refuse to consider the fact you're wrong.

Kevin is just an outright liar as demonstrated by the fact there is only two or three who pretend to have heard explosives. Everyone else didn't. The audio recordings don't record the massive explosion Kevin claimed to have heard. So either every audio recording is wrong or your hero is a fucking piece of shit liar.

 

[eots]

no one but you has said 3oo hundred firemen where in on it but you ninny and the fact remains there are first responders and people trapped in wtc 7 that report massive explosions

Are you retarded? A massive explosion in WTC 7 before the collapse of either tower would have been known by EVERYONE at ground zero. You can't keep shit like that quiet unless everyone is in on it. Come on. You pretend you're smart. Time to man up and realize the ridiculousness of your position. But then again, I know you will refuse to consider the fact you're wrong.

Kevin is just an outright liar as demonstrated by the fact there is only two or three who pretend to have heard explosives. Everyone else didn't. The audio recordings don't record the massive explosion Kevin claimed to have heard. So either every audio recording is wrong or your hero is a fucking piece of shit liar.

so any wittiness that heard an explosion is a liar...I see and why do you make the flase claim that no one else reported explosions ?

 

[Mad Scientist]

We may never know if the Twin Towers were purposely imploded or not, just not enough evidence there to show beyond a reasonable doubt that they were. Just like the JFK assassination.

But one thing I do know for certain is that Al Qaida in Libya is our friend. But once they come here, they're our mortal enemies!

 

[eots]

YouTube - Barry Jennings: WTC 7 (Explosions) Interview

YouTube - The Elephant In The Room:Kevin McPadden, 9/11-1st Responder

Eots, please tell us why there are no audio recordings of the explosions that Mr. McPadden is talking about.

if there are any they are most Likely in the hands of NIST

 

[SFC Ollie]

YouTube - Barry Jennings: WTC 7 (Explosions) Interview

YouTube - The Elephant In The Room:Kevin McPadden, 9/11-1st Responder

Eots, please tell us why there are no audio recordings of the explosions that Mr. McPadden is talking about.

if there are any they are most Likely in the hands of NIST

So there are no recordings. Every major TV network in the world that had a camera in NYC that morning had it on and recording everything that they could and not one of them recorded these explosions. Do you begin to see what I'm saying?

 

[PhysicsExist]

Eots, please tell us why there are no audio recordings of the explosions that Mr. McPadden is talking about.

if there are any they are most Likely in the hands of NIST

So there are no recordings. Every major TV network in the world that had a camera in NYC that morning had it on and recording everything that they could and not one of them recorded these explosions. Do you begin to see what I'm saying?

As officers in the U.S. military, we took an oath to "support and defend the Constitution of the United States against all enemies, foreign and domestic." Regardless of our current status -- active duty, reserves, retired, or civilian -- that oath remains in force.

Therefore it is not just our responsibility, it is our duty to expose the real perpetrators of 9/11 and bring them to justice, no matter how hard it is, how long it takes, how much we have to suffer, or where it leads us. We owe this to those who have gone before us who executed that same oath, and we owe it to those who are following that same oath today in Iraq and Afghanistan. We believe the official account of 9/11 as defined in the 9/11 Commission Report is grossly inaccurate and fatally flawed. It is imperative that we have an accurate understanding of 9/11 so that those responsible can be identified and brought to justice in order that they and similarly-minded people never again commit such heinous crimes. It is also imperative that we have an accurate understanding of 9/11 so that governmental policies resulting from 9/11 are based on truth rather than deception.

Military Officers for 9/11 Truth

The worst a man could do is betray his people and break his oath. Ollie, you are a coward...but worst of all, a traitor.

[ame=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eHo5hNCvLb4]YouTube - Help put this TV Ad on the Air -- Go to RememberBuilding7.org[/ame]

 

[SFC Ollie]

if there are any they are most Likely in the hands of NIST

So there are no recordings. Every major TV network in the world that had a camera in NYC that morning had it on and recording everything that they could and not one of them recorded these explosions. Do you begin to see what I'm saying?

As officers in the U.S. military, we took an oath to "support and defend the Constitution of the United States against all enemies, foreign and domestic." Regardless of our current status -- active duty, reserves, retired, or civilian -- that oath remains in force.

Therefore it is not just our responsibility, it is our duty to expose the real perpetrators of 9/11 and bring them to justice, no matter how hard it is, how long it takes, how much we have to suffer, or where it leads us. We owe this to those who have gone before us who executed that same oath, and we owe it to those who are following that same oath today in Iraq and Afghanistan. We believe the official account of 9/11 as defined in the 9/11 Commission Report is grossly inaccurate and fatally flawed. It is imperative that we have an accurate understanding of 9/11 so that those responsible can be identified and brought to justice in order that they and similarly-minded people never again commit such heinous crimes. It is also imperative that we have an accurate understanding of 9/11 so that governmental policies resulting from 9/11 are based on truth rather than deception.

Military Officers for 9/11 Truth

The worst a man could do is betray his people and break his oath. Ollie, you are a coward...but worst of all, a traitor.

[ame=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eHo5hNCvLb4]YouTube - Help put this TV Ad on the Air -- Go to RememberBuilding7.org[/ame]

Fuck you shit breath. After you have worn the uniform and lived under the oath for as long as I have then and only then will we ever discuss your views on it. Until then Fuck you very much, you don't know shit about it. And I can guarantee you that those prior service members who are members of your miniature group would tell you the same thing.

It really hurts you to be that wrong doesn't it?

 

[eots]

Eots, please tell us why there are no audio recordings of the explosions that Mr. McPadden is talking about.

if there are any they are most Likely in the hands of NIST

So there are no recordings. Every major TV network in the world that had a camera in NYC that morning had it on and recording everything that they could and not one of them recorded these explosions. Do you begin to see what I'm saying?

I am still waiting for the link to your hundreds of wtc 7 collapse videos

 

[Patriot911]

no one but you has said 3oo hundred firemen where in on it but you ninny and the fact remains there are first responders and people trapped in wtc 7 that report massive explosions

Are you retarded? A massive explosion in WTC 7 before the collapse of either tower would have been known by EVERYONE at ground zero. You can't keep shit like that quiet unless everyone is in on it. Come on. You pretend you're smart. Time to man up and realize the ridiculousness of your position. But then again, I know you will refuse to consider the fact you're wrong.

Kevin is just an outright liar as demonstrated by the fact there is only two or three who pretend to have heard explosives. Everyone else didn't. The audio recordings don't record the massive explosion Kevin claimed to have heard. So either every audio recording is wrong or your hero is a fucking piece of shit liar.

so any wittiness that heard an explosion is a liar...I see and why do you make the flase claim that no one else reported explosions ?

Ah. More bullshit lying from eots. Anyone who ever had any doubt about the absolute dishonesty of eots should look at this and understand exactly what kind of piece of shit fucktard he really is.

Where did I ever say or imply anyone who heard an explosion is a liar? I called Kevin a liar because his story doesn't match anyone elses experience or the physical evidence. He also claimed to hear a countdown that isn't on any of the recordings taken on 9/11. Why is it truthtards believe the extreme frings of witnesses and believe them over everyone else? How utterly retarded is that!

People heard explosions. Explosions were caught on tape. There is no doubt there were explosions. It is when stupid fuckers like you pretend all explosions HAD to be caused by explosives that your shitty theory's wheels fall off.

So way to go, eots! You've exposed your sorry ass as the utter dishonest liar that you are. Aren't you proud of yourself?

 

[PhysicsExist]

Are you retarded? A massive explosion in WTC 7 before the collapse of either tower would have been known by EVERYONE at ground zero. You can't keep shit like that quiet unless everyone is in on it. Come on. You pretend you're smart. Time to man up and realize the ridiculousness of your position. But then again, I know you will refuse to consider the fact you're wrong.

Kevin is just an outright liar as demonstrated by the fact there is only two or three who pretend to have heard explosives. Everyone else didn't. The audio recordings don't record the massive explosion Kevin claimed to have heard. So either every audio recording is wrong or your hero is a fucking piece of shit liar.

so any wittiness that heard an explosion is a liar...I see and why do you make the flase claim that no one else reported explosions ?

Ah. More bullshit lying from eots. Anyone who ever had any doubt about the absolute dishonesty of eots should look at this and understand exactly what kind of piece of shit fucktard he really is.

Where did I ever say or imply anyone who heard an explosion is a liar? I called Kevin a liar because his story doesn't match anyone elses experience or the physical evidence. He also claimed to hear a countdown that isn't on any of the recordings taken on 9/11. Why is it truthtards believe the extreme frings of witnesses and believe them over everyone else? How utterly retarded is that!

People heard explosions. Explosions were caught on tape. There is no doubt there were explosions. It is when stupid fuckers like you pretend all explosions HAD to be caused by explosives that your shitty theory's wheels fall off.

So way to go, eots! You've exposed your sorry ass as the utter dishonest liar that you are. Aren't you proud of yourself?

You sound very immature and you seem not to be able to hold your composure when it comes to the FACTS of NANOTHERMITE and FREE FALL. Is it because you can't debunk it, so you just stirr up some other issues while personally attacking people?

Independent researchers have discovered a highly engineered explosive-incendiary material in several dust samples collected near the WTC site. In their paper, entitled Active Thermitic Material Discovered in Dust from the 9/11 World Trade Center Catastrophe, nine researchers, led by chemist Niels Harrit of the University of Copenhagen, conclude:

“[T]he red layer of the red/gray chips we have discovered in the WTC dust is active, unreacted thermitic material, incorporating nanotechnology, and is a highly energetic pyrotechnic or explosive material.”

REFERENCES

Harrit, Farrer, Jones, Ryan, Legge, Farnsworth, Roberts, Gourley, Larsen, “Active Thermitic Material Discovered in Dust from the 9/11 World Trade Center Catastrophe,” Bentham Open Access, 2009. http://rememberbuilding7.org/downloads/Full_Thermite_paper.pdf

Why would NIST want to say Building 7 did not experience free fall? NIST’s lead technical investigator, Shyam Sunder, stated in the WTC 7 technical briefing that free fall could only happen when an object “has no structural components below it.”[ii] The only way for a building to have no structural components below it is to remove the lower structural components with an external force such as explosives. If the upper part of a building is crushing its lower structural components, in other words, doing the work of removing them, not all of its energy will be converted into motion and its descent will not be free fall.

A high school physics teacher named David Chandler objected to NIST’s initial claim, pointing out that, based on video footage of Building 7’s destruction, NIST’s claim contradicted “a publicly visible, easily measurable quantity.”[iii] Mr. Chandler wrote a comment to NIST, saying, “Acknowledgement of and accounting for an extended period of free fall in the collapse of WTC 7 must be a priority if NIST is to be taken seriously.”[iv]

Responding to the criticism, NIST in its final report issued in November 2008 did finally acknowledge that Building 7 descended at free fall. According to NIST, “This free fall drop continued for approximately 8 stories, or 32.0 meters (105 ft), the distance traveled between times t = 1.75 s and t = 4.0 s [a period of 2.25 seconds].”[v] However, NIST did not attempt to explain how Building 7’s free fall descent could have occurred.

Only explosives can instantaneously remove 8 stories allowing the upper structure to accelerate downwards in free fall. The absolute free fall of Building 7 over a period of 2.25 seconds is by itself overwhelming evidence that explosives were used to bring down the building.

[ame=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=v3mudruFzNw&feature=related]YouTube - WTC7: NIST Finally Admits Freefall (Part III)[/ame]

 

[SFC Ollie]

if there are any they are most Likely in the hands of NIST

So there are no recordings. Every major TV network in the world that had a camera in NYC that morning had it on and recording everything that they could and not one of them recorded these explosions. Do you begin to see what I'm saying?

I am still waiting for the link to your hundreds of wtc 7 collapse videos

Never said there were. But I wouldn't doubt it. If not for all the truther links cluttering up Google we might be able to find some serious things. But Every nut has to have his say...

 

[rightwinger]

Why would anyone want to blow up dust?

 

[Mr. Jones]

Squibs. Can you prove without a doubt that those were caused by explosives and not air pressure?

It is NIST that has to prove their theory since they were charged with that task, and there is sufficient counter theory to doubt their explanation.
Defenders of the gravity collapse theory consistently invoke the explanation that the ejections of dust are caused by pancaking floors squeezing out air and dust. The Popular Mechanics article attacking 9/11 Truth contains the following passage.

Like all office buildings, the WTC towers contained a huge volume of air. As they pancaked, all that air--along with the concrete and other debris pulverized by the force of the collapse--was ejected with enormous energy. "When you have a significant portion of a floor collapsing, it's going to shoot air and concrete dust out the window," NIST lead investigator Shyam Sunder tells PM. Those clouds of dust may create the impression of a controlled demolition, Sunder adds, "but it is the floor pancaking that leads to that perception."

NIST's final Report on the Twin Towers mentions the piston theory to attempt to explain away the ejections:
The falling mass of the building compressed the air ahead of it, much like the action of a piston, forcing material, such as smoke and debris, out the windows as seen in several videos.

There are several problems with this explanation, which we designate the piston theory.

* The squibs contain thick dust of a light color, apparently from crushed concrete and gypsum. But these materials would not have been crushed until the pancaking floors above impacted the floor emitting the squib. Thus the dust would not be produced until the air was already squeezed out, so there was no source of the dust for the squib.

* The squibs emerge from the facade 10 to 20 floors below the exploding rubble cloud inside of which the tower is disintegrating. The thick clouds appear to contain the pulverized concrete of the floor slabs, which was the only concrete component of the tower. But the piston theory requires that the floors have already pancaked down to the level of the squib, making them unavailable for the production of the concrete dust more than 10 floors above.

* The piston theory requires a rather orderly pancaking of the floor diaphragms within the intact sleeve of the perimeter wall. Such a process should have left a stack of floor diaphragms at the tower's base at the end of the collapse. But there was no such stack. In fact, it is difficult to find recognizable pieces of floor slabs of any size in Ground Zero photographs.

* The North Tower exhibits three distinct sets of squibs at different elevations of the building. Each set is visible as two distinct squibs on the same floor, one emerging from about the horizontal center of each of the tower's two visible faces. This pattern is is far too focused and symmetric to be explained by the piston theory, which would produce similar pressures across each floor and over successive floors.

* The pancaking of floors within the perimeter wall would have created under pressures in the region above the top pancaking floor. But we seen no evidence of dust being sucked back into the tower.

9-11 Research: Squibs