Explain how this is an exoneration

[captkaos]

I don't understand how Trumpsters can call this a complete exoneration, and say it's over, when they know the Dems are going after elements of the report with everything that they have.

Because >>>>>? They can stomp their feet and piss and moan until 2021. then they can stomp their feet and Piss and Moan until 2025. Because>>>>>>>> that's all they have left No plan, No legitimate Candidate, And an agenda bent on destroying Freedom, Except for the Political Elite left and their supporters.

 

[Markle]

I don't understand how Trumpsters can call this a complete exoneration, and say it's over, when they know the Dems are going after elements of the report with everything that they have.

What leads you to believe that calling someone who supports and voted for President Donald Trump names will, in some way, injure or hurt them? Why does it make you feel better?

You described the issue yourself.

As you know, the Mueller Investigation is not aimed at the phony Steele Dossier, who ordered it and who paid for the report. They are also looking into the FISA reports and how they were created. Little wonder that Democrats and Progressives are in a panic.

 

[Mac1958]

I don't understand how Trumpsters can call this a complete exoneration, and say it's over, when they know the Dems are going after elements of the report with everything that they have.

What leads you to believe that calling someone who supports and voted for President Donald Trump names will, in some way, injure or hurt them? Why does it make you feel better?

You described the issue yourself.

As you know, the Mueller Investigation is not aimed at the phony Steele Dossier, who ordered it and who paid for the report. They are also looking into the FISA reports and how they were created. Little wonder that Democrats and Progressives are in a panic.

It's not name-calling. Trump supporters. Trumpsters. That's not an epithet, it's just shorter.

The fact remains, the Dems are confident the Mueller report left them enough crumbs to work with. And whether they're right or wrong, this issue has clearly not reached a conclusion, regardless of what Trump and his supporters claim.
.

 

[Stormy Daniels]

You see when a Prosecutor doesn't prosecute that means the person is exonerated of wrongdoing.

You are ignoring what Mueller's report actually says.

 

[Uncensored2008]

It's not name-calling. Trump supporters. Trumpsters. That's not an epithet, it's just shorter.

The fact remains, the Dems are confident the Mueller report left them enough crumbs to work with. And whether they're right or wrong, this issue has clearly not reached a conclusion, regardless of what Trump and his supporters claim.
.

Did you vote for Barack Obamugabe?

So, given that with two years and $40 million in taxpayer money Torquemada and his goons found NOTHING, not a ******* thing, what will create a "conclusion" for you? When the 2016 election is undone and 63 million American voters are disenfranchised?

Civil wars rage because the people lose faith in the structure of their governments and the ability of laws to contain chaos.

Why would any sane person think that if the Stalinist democrats can throw out the rule of law and simply overthrow a sitting president that there is any rule of law?

Why should we NOT put down those of you who have destroyed our nation, our Constitution, and our system of government by force of arms? Give me any rational reason?

We had an election, you didn't like the results so you refused to accept them.

You cooked up an absurd conspiracy theory of Trump colluding with the Russians, based on a dossier you BOUGHT FROM THE RUSSIANS. You set the most unethical and corrupt pile of shit in American history who employed tactics not seen since the Spanish Inquisition on a witch hunt in a blind rage to take the president down, he failed because real law enforcement made him abide by the law.

And you REFUSE TO ACCEPT THE REPORT he issued that clears the president of your dumbfuck conspiracy theory.

You and the other Stalinists will never accept anything, you mean to destroy the Usurper who is threatening the established rule of the deep state, and you will use ANY MEANS, legal or illegal, to obtain your goal.

You are waging civil war against the United States, why should we not use force of arms to defend against your assault?

 

[Uncensored2008]

You see when a Prosecutor doesn't prosecute that means the person is exonerated of wrongdoing.

You are ignoring what Mueller's report actually says.

Oh the irony.

You only know what the hate sites say ABOUT the report, you have no ******* clue what is actually in it. I proved that over the weekend.

 

[Stormy Daniels]

You see when a Prosecutor doesn't prosecute that means the person is exonerated of wrongdoing.

You are ignoring what Mueller's report actually says.

Oh the irony.

You only know what the hate sites say ABOUT the report, you have no ******* clue what is actually in it. I proved that over the weekend.

I've given exact volume, page, and paragraph citations. You have yet to actually engage with any substance whatsoever. Use a napkin, would you?

 

[Uncensored2008]

You see when a Prosecutor doesn't prosecute that means the person is exonerated of wrongdoing.

You are ignoring what Mueller's report actually says.

Oh the irony.

You only know what the hate sites say ABOUT the report, you have no ******* clue what is actually in it. I proved that over the weekend.

I've given exact volume, page, and paragraph citations.

I know I did - you sure didn't.

 

[Frankeneinstein]

Mueller's report explains his prosecutorial decisions in four points.

1. The DOJ's OLC has issued the opinion that a sitting President cannot be indicted, and the SC accepted that opinion for the purposes of his investigation, further recognizing that a DOJ indictment might preempt the constitutional mechanism of impeachment.
2. The investigation was nevertheless warranted because an criminal investigation is permitted under the OLC's standard, even when an indictment is not. Other individuals engaging in obstruction could be prosecuted immediately. And the President is not immune from prosecution after leaving office, regardless of whether impeachment proceedings are brought or are successful. So the investigation served the purpose of preserving evidence while witness memories were fresh.
3. The normal public mechanism for an individual accused of a crime to clear themselves is a speedy public criminal trial. If the sitting President cannot be brought to a criminal trial while in office, then it would be unfair for the SC to affirmatively accuse him of a crime that cannot be prosecuted in a criminal court of law at this time. Even a sealed indictment's secrecy could not be guaranteed to be preserved. Accordingly, a criminal accusation against a sitting President could be harmful to the country, because the accusation cannot be resolved in the normal adversarial manner of a criminal trial.
   
4. The results of the investigation do not allow the SC to conclude that the President did not commit obstruction.

So please explain how this exonerates Donald?

No mention of collusion at all, hence he has been exonerated

 

[Mac1958]

It's not name-calling. Trump supporters. Trumpsters. That's not an epithet, it's just shorter.

The fact remains, the Dems are confident the Mueller report left them enough crumbs to work with. And whether they're right or wrong, this issue has clearly not reached a conclusion, regardless of what Trump and his supporters claim.
.

Did you vote for Barack Obamugabe?

So, given that with two years and $40 million in taxpayer money Torquemada and his goons found NOTHING, not a ******* thing, what will create a "conclusion" for you? When the 2016 election is undone and 63 million American voters are disenfranchised?

Civil wars rage because the people lose faith in the structure of their governments and the ability of laws to contain chaos.

Why would any sane person think that if the Stalinist democrats can throw out the rule of law and simply overthrow a sitting president that there is any rule of law?

Why should we NOT put down those of you who have destroyed our nation, our Constitution, and our system of government by force of arms? Give me any rational reason?

We had an election, you didn't like the results so you refused to accept them.

You cooked up an absurd conspiracy theory of Trump colluding with the Russians, based on a dossier you BOUGHT FROM THE RUSSIANS. You set the most unethical and corrupt pile of shit in American history who employed tactics not seen since the Spanish Inquisition on a witch hunt in a blind rage to take the president down, he failed because real law enforcement made him abide by the law.

And you REFUSE TO ACCEPT THE REPORT he issued that clears the president of your dumbfuck conspiracy theory.

You and the other Stalinists will never accept anything, you mean to destroy the Usurper who is threatening the established rule of the deep state, and you will use ANY MEANS, legal or illegal, to obtain your goal.

You are waging civil war against the United States, why should we not use force of arms to defend against your assault?

Yikes.

Despite your emotional outbursts, the Democrats aren't going to stop. Therefore, this isn't over.

That was my only point. The one that caused you to go full-on talk radio drama queen there.
.

 

[Uncensored2008]

It's not name-calling. Trump supporters. Trumpsters. That's not an epithet, it's just shorter.

The fact remains, the Dems are confident the Mueller report left them enough crumbs to work with. And whether they're right or wrong, this issue has clearly not reached a conclusion, regardless of what Trump and his supporters claim.
.

Did you vote for Barack Obamugabe?

So, given that with two years and $40 million in taxpayer money Torquemada and his goons found NOTHING, not a ******* thing, what will create a "conclusion" for you? When the 2016 election is undone and 63 million American voters are disenfranchised?

Civil wars rage because the people lose faith in the structure of their governments and the ability of laws to contain chaos.

Why would any sane person think that if the Stalinist democrats can throw out the rule of law and simply overthrow a sitting president that there is any rule of law?

Why should we NOT put down those of you who have destroyed our nation, our Constitution, and our system of government by force of arms? Give me any rational reason?

We had an election, you didn't like the results so you refused to accept them.

You cooked up an absurd conspiracy theory of Trump colluding with the Russians, based on a dossier you BOUGHT FROM THE RUSSIANS. You set the most unethical and corrupt pile of shit in American history who employed tactics not seen since the Spanish Inquisition on a witch hunt in a blind rage to take the president down, he failed because real law enforcement made him abide by the law.

And you REFUSE TO ACCEPT THE REPORT he issued that clears the president of your dumbfuck conspiracy theory.

You and the other Stalinists will never accept anything, you mean to destroy the Usurper who is threatening the established rule of the deep state, and you will use ANY MEANS, legal or illegal, to obtain your goal.

You are waging civil war against the United States, why should we not use force of arms to defend against your assault?

Yikes.

Despite your emotional outbursts, the Democrats aren't going to stop. Therefore, this isn't over.

That was my only point. The one that caused you to go full-on talk radio drama queen there.
.

Yeah, what other than fling shit do you think your Stalinist party is going to do? Honestly?

4 investigations found no collusion and no obstruction. Are you morons going to "Impeehh cuz he is yukey and we dont like that he one..."

The scumbag Stalinists will never stop, but they will be thrown out of power in 2020. The lying **** press will continue to lie and slander, but it won't amount to much.

What the tinfoil hat assholes in congress WON'T due is actually impeach.

 

[WEATHER53]

Exoneration is not part of the process. More libbie fake news.

 

[Mac1958]

It's not name-calling. Trump supporters. Trumpsters. That's not an epithet, it's just shorter.

The fact remains, the Dems are confident the Mueller report left them enough crumbs to work with. And whether they're right or wrong, this issue has clearly not reached a conclusion, regardless of what Trump and his supporters claim.
.

Did you vote for Barack Obamugabe?

So, given that with two years and $40 million in taxpayer money Torquemada and his goons found NOTHING, not a ******* thing, what will create a "conclusion" for you? When the 2016 election is undone and 63 million American voters are disenfranchised?

Civil wars rage because the people lose faith in the structure of their governments and the ability of laws to contain chaos.

Why would any sane person think that if the Stalinist democrats can throw out the rule of law and simply overthrow a sitting president that there is any rule of law?

Why should we NOT put down those of you who have destroyed our nation, our Constitution, and our system of government by force of arms? Give me any rational reason?

We had an election, you didn't like the results so you refused to accept them.

You cooked up an absurd conspiracy theory of Trump colluding with the Russians, based on a dossier you BOUGHT FROM THE RUSSIANS. You set the most unethical and corrupt pile of shit in American history who employed tactics not seen since the Spanish Inquisition on a witch hunt in a blind rage to take the president down, he failed because real law enforcement made him abide by the law.

And you REFUSE TO ACCEPT THE REPORT he issued that clears the president of your dumbfuck conspiracy theory.

You and the other Stalinists will never accept anything, you mean to destroy the Usurper who is threatening the established rule of the deep state, and you will use ANY MEANS, legal or illegal, to obtain your goal.

You are waging civil war against the United States, why should we not use force of arms to defend against your assault?

Yikes.

Despite your emotional outbursts, the Democrats aren't going to stop. Therefore, this isn't over.

That was my only point. The one that caused you to go full-on talk radio drama queen there.
.

Yeah, what other than fling shit do you think your Stalinist party is going to do? Honestly?

4 investigations found no collusion and no obstruction. Are you morons going to "Impeehh cuz he is yukey and we dont like that he one..."

The scumbag Stalinists will never stop, but they will be thrown out of power in 2020. The lying **** press will continue to lie and slander, but it won't amount to much.

What the tinfoil hat assholes in congress WON'T due is actually impeach.

Since I think this is just political, you'll have to ask someone else.
.

 

[Stormy Daniels]

Many of the responses here have been debunked by Mueller's public statements, and have since been replaced with the kettle logic that Mueller is corrupt and biased. Interesting how things turn on their insane heads so seamlessly.

 

[Uncensored2008]

Many of the responses here have been debunked by Mueller's public statements, and have since been replaced with the kettle logic that Mueller is corrupt and biased. Interesting how things turn on their insane heads so seamlessly.

What a ******* idiot, even for a hack.

{
The investigation did not establish any agreement among Campaign officials or between such officials and Russia-linked individuals to interfere with or obstruct a lawful function of a government agency during the campaign or transition period. And, as discussed in Volume 1, Section V.A, supra, the investigation did not identify evidence that any Campaign official or associate knowingly and intentionally participated in the conspiracy to defraud that the Office charged, namely, the active-measures conspiracy described in Volume 1, Section II, supra.

Accordingly, the Office did not charge any Campaign associate or other US. person with conspiracy to defraud the United States based on the Russia-related contacts described in Section IV above.

}

 

[miketx]

Many of the responses here have been debunked by Mueller's public statements, and have since been replaced with the kettle logic that Mueller is corrupt and biased. Interesting how things turn on their insane heads so seamlessly.

Do you get a quarter each time you lie?

 

[Admiral Rockwell Tory]

Many of the responses here have been debunked by Mueller's public statements, and have since been replaced with the kettle logic that Mueller is corrupt and biased. Interesting how things turn on their insane heads so seamlessly.

Do you get a quarter each time you lie?

There is a joke about a two-bit something in there!

 

[bripat9643]

Many of the responses here have been debunked by Mueller's public statements, and have since been replaced with the kettle logic that Mueller is corrupt and biased. Interesting how things turn on their insane heads so seamlessly.

You mean the public statements Mueller later had to recant?

 

[Stormy Daniels]

Many of the responses here have been debunked by Mueller's public statements, and have since been replaced with the kettle logic that Mueller is corrupt and biased. Interesting how things turn on their insane heads so seamlessly.

You mean the public statements Mueller later had to recant?

More fantasy than Game of Thrones.

 

[bripat9643]

Many of the responses here have been debunked by Mueller's public statements, and have since been replaced with the kettle logic that Mueller is corrupt and biased. Interesting how things turn on their insane heads so seamlessly.

You mean the public statements Mueller later had to recant?

More fantasy than Game of Thrones.

Mueller BACKTRACKED Everything He Said In Yesterday's Statement On Obstruction In A Joint Statement With AG Bill Barr - Usa On

There's the proof that you're an imbecile.