LA RAM FAN
Diamond Member
- Mar 1, 2008
- 50,938
- 18,224
- 2,250
- Thread starter
- #921
yeah we both know you lie and always will.so now you have gone from saying the raiders would be the one that would move there to LA and the Rams never would, to the Rams will sometime in the next three years.gotcha. i wondered what you would try and come up with to try and weasel your way out of itStan Kroenke finally announced plans to build a new stadium in CA. This means the Rams will move back to CA sometime over the next 3 years.yep,sometime in the next three years alright,september 2015 will be that third year.
will be so interesting to see what you come up with next when the team is playing in the rose bowl or the LA coliseum in 2015.
I honestly expected you to come back and say Stan Kronke is building an NFL stadium out of his kind generous heart so the raiders could have a stadium to play in.this one though is ALMOST as funny as that one would have been had you come back and said that like i was expecting
![]()
You are the same lying sack of shit you always have been. I never said "the Raiders would be the team that would move to LA and the Rams never would".
You lie, you lie, you always lie!!!
Stan is just using his families WalMart property as leverage in negociations with St. Louis. It will cost him $2.5 billion to move the team. The NFL will hit him with a $275 million relocation fee if he moves the Rams to Los Angeles. The massive relocation fee and the cost of building a stadium himself would appear to be prohibitive.
Never said stan wasn't going to move the rams huh? liar.this post proves beyond a doubt you were convinced he was trying to get a new stadium in st Louis,that he just purchased the land for mere leverage.


hate to break the news to you but he NEVER had any interest in getting a new stadium in st Louis or negotiating with them like you claimed


