EXCLUSIVE: Hot fusion breakthrough only “allowed” because of COLD FUSION (LENR) revolution now under way

[DudleySmith]

Use hydrogen for IC engines?

Yes.

Hydrogen internal combustion engines and hydrogen fuel cells | Cummins Inc.

Regulations limiting greenhouse gas emissions (GHGs) from motor vehicles are tightening around the world. With this, both hydrogen engines and hydrogen fuel cells are receiving an increasing interest.

www.cummins.com

Many oil companies used natural gas powered vehicles for a long time, don't know if they still do or not; natural gas was just dirty hydrogen.

 

[Toddsterpatriot]

Yes.

Hydrogen internal combustion engines and hydrogen fuel cells | Cummins Inc.

Regulations limiting greenhouse gas emissions (GHGs) from motor vehicles are tightening around the world. With this, both hydrogen engines and hydrogen fuel cells are receiving an increasing interest.

www.cummins.com

Many oil companies used natural gas powered vehicles for a long time, don't know if they still do or not; natural gas was just dirty hydrogen.

Making hydrogen seems like a lot of work compared to just using natural gas.

 

[ReinyDays]

Piston engines have to be specifically designed to burn ethanol ... and I believe the same is true for hydrogen ... both burn too quickly in an engine designed for gasoline ... the octane rating is too low ... the fuel will detonate in the cylinder ... that's a bad thing ...

Brazil has been pushing forward on ethanol since the OPEC Oil Embargos in the 1970's ... and produce cars designed to run on ethanol (E100) ... they have a tropical climate which grows ethanol-bearing plants at a violent rate ... jungle plants kill a man who isn't moving fast enough ... and the in tropics, there's hydro-power everyplace in over-abundance ...

Jets have the same problem ... these smaller lighter fuels burn too fast ... and jets need even higher octane ratings ... 140 and up ...

=====

Y'all are over-thinking the problem ... the Green New Deal will reduce passenger cars and airline travel by 90% ... once imposed, then the gasoline will last thousands of years longer ... only whitie PIGS will have cars in the future ...

 

[DudleySmith]

Making hydrogen seems like a lot of work compared to just using natural gas.

Natural gas is a lot of work as well, and it's exhausts aren't as clean as relatively pure hydrogen. It is also better combustion to gasoline and natural gas, hence better mileage. It also doesn't dirty up motor oil as quickly.

 

[Toddsterpatriot]

Natural gas is a lot of work as well, and it's exhausts aren't as clean as relatively pure hydrogen. It is also better combustion to gasoline and natural gas, hence better mileage. It also doesn't dirty up motor oil as quickly.

Natural gas is a lot of work as well,

It comes out of the ground with a bunch of energy ready to be released.
Unlike your "green hydrogen".

and it's exhausts aren't as clean as relatively pure hydrogen

Why is it dirtier?

It is also better combustion to gasoline and natural gas, hence better mileage.

Much less energy dense. Much harder to transport and store.

 

[DudleySmith]

Natural gas is a lot of work as well,

It comes out of the ground with a bunch of energy ready to be released.
Unlike your "green hydrogen".

and it's exhausts aren't as clean as relatively pure hydrogen

Why is it dirtier?

It is also better combustion to gasoline and natural gas, hence better mileage.

Much less energy dense. Much harder to transport and store.

It's not 'my green hydrogen', as I said they're making a mistake relying on undependable energy supplies.

It's dirtier for the same reasons gasoline is; it has a lot of chemicals and gases in it that need removing.

Hydrogen is a gas, it's no harder to store than natural gas, since you need a lot less space for the energy equivalent. As for transport a car tank of hydrogen will go a lot further than the equivalent weight of natural gas.

 

[DudleySmith]

iston engines have to be specifically designed to burn ethanol ... and I believe the same is true for hydrogen ... both burn too quickly in an engine designed for gasoline ... the octane rating is too low ... the fuel will detonate in the cylinder ... that's a bad thing ...

IC engines have to be tweaked, yes, but not that much. And it's also useful in fuel cells as well, double bang for the bucks, if the costs can come down. With a Nuke plant that would be considerable savings as an energy supply even with current technology.

 

[Toddsterpatriot]

It's not 'my green hydrogen', as I said they're making a mistake relying on undependable energy supplies.

It's dirtier for the same reasons gasoline is; it has a lot of chemicals and gases in it that need removing.

Hydrogen is a gas, it's no harder to store than natural gas, since you need a lot less space for the energy equivalent. As for transport a car tank of hydrogen will go a lot further than the equivalent weight of natural gas.

Hydrogen is a gas, it's no harder to store than natural gas,

It is harder. Hydrogen embrittlement for one. Much smaller molecule for two.

since you need a lot less space for the energy equivalent.

Hydrogen has less energy per cubic foot.

As for transport a car tank of hydrogen will go a lot further than the equivalent weight of natural gas.

Equivalent weight? What's the energy per liter at STP compared to natural gas?

 

[DudleySmith]

Hydrogen is a gas, it's no harder to store than natural gas,

It is harder. Hydrogen embrittlement for one. Much smaller molecule for two.

since you need a lot less space for the energy equivalent.

Hydrogen has less energy per cubic foot.

As for transport a car tank of hydrogen will go a lot further than the equivalent weight of natural gas.

Equivalent weight? What's the energy per liter at STP compared to natural gas?

Materials science can easily overcome that.

Hydrogen can be mixed with other stuff that produces a lot cleaner burning and hotter burning, hence it's more energy efficient than methane or raw natural gas; the latter contains a lot of other gasses that burn at different rates.

See above.

 

[Toddsterpatriot]

Materials science can easily overcome that.

Hydrogen can be mixed with other stuff that produces a lot cleaner burning and hotter burning, hence it's more energy efficient than methane or raw natural gas; the latter contains a lot of other gasses that burn at different rates.

See above.

Materials science can easily overcome that.

Easily? That's funny.

Hydrogen can be mixed with other stuff that produces a lot cleaner burning and hotter burning,

Like natural gas? How much more efficient? Natural gas already burns pretty cleanly.

 

[DudleySmith]

Materials science can easily overcome that.

Easily? That's funny.

Hydrogen can be mixed with other stuff that produces a lot cleaner burning and hotter burning,

Like natural gas? How much more efficient? Natural gas already burns pretty cleanly.

Lok, I know you're stupid and just trolling. You and Poop Face are twins. The PEanut Gallery can find all they need to know about it, even if you can't. You and your peers still think 'Biden shut down the Keystone Pipeline', so it's not like you're posting from any knowledge about anything.

 

[Toddsterpatriot]

Lok, I know you're stupid and just trolling. You and Poop Face are twins. The PEanut Gallery can find all they need to know about it, even if you can't. You and your peers still think 'Biden shut down the Keystone Pipeline', so it's not like you're posting from any knowledge about anything.

If it's easy to stop hydrogen from escaping from a container or to
prevent hydrogen embrittlement, you must have plenty of examples.

Post a couple. Or were you talking from ignorance?

 

[DudleySmith]

If it's easy to stop hydrogen from escaping from a container or to
prevent hydrogen embrittlement, you must have plenty of examples.

Post a couple. Or were you talking from ignorance?

If you can't find that info, then it's you talking from ignorance.

 

[Toddsterpatriot]

If you can't find that info, then it's you talking from ignorance.

If you've solved those issues, you'd be worth billions.