Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
Too bad they don't have any. Sucks when the narrative gets blown up, doesn't it?There's plenty of evidence Joe Biden took bribes, assface. Who paid for that Pennsyvania University office
building, dumbass?
It was CHINA, you fuck!
Really you stupid shitbirds are strutting around and crowing about nothing like idiots.Too bad they don't have any. Sucks when the narrative gets blown up, doesn't it?
Keep digging. You might find something that sticks to the wall....but don't hold your breath.
Republicans and conservatives look like idiots this morning....but, that's not much of a change from any other morning.
Your link does say he admitted he lied. The headline literally says he got the Intel from Russians…isn’t that who Clinton paid for “information” about trump?
Sucks when you find out you've been lied to, doesn't it.Really you stupid shitbirds are strutting around and crowing about nothing like idiots.
No. Clinton didn't pay the Russians for anything. Why do we keep recycling these lies?Your link does say he admitted he lied. The headline literally says he got the Intel from Russians…isn’t that who Clinton paid for “information” about trump?
www.pbs.org
Yeah, she paid a British guy for that. It was all false, too.No. Clinton didn't pay the Russians for anything. Why do we keep recycling these lies?
How the anti-Trump dossier came to be
The Washington Free Beacon, a conservative site based in Washington, D.C., confirmed that it hired the firm Fusion GPS to unearth damaging information about President Donald Trump in the run-up to the election. GOP donor and billionaire Paul Singer is one of the site’s key backers. Associated...
This guy admitted he lied. That just confirms that this IS just Russian disinformation.
To be dismissed.
Actually, if you read the link I included, you'll find she didn't.Yeah, she paid a British guy for that. It was all false, too.
I've already done my research on that. Fuck your link.Actually, if you read the link I included, you'll find she didn't.
Another alt-right lie.
So you've bought the lie and nothing's going to move you off that. Noted. She didn't pay the Russians for anything. Her campaign did receive the dossier.I've already done my research on that. Fuck your link.
Where is the link and quote where he admitted he lied? Obviously there were Russian sources, Hunter's Ukraine company had ties to Russia.No. Clinton didn't pay the Russians for anything. Why do we keep recycling these lies?
How the anti-Trump dossier came to be
The Washington Free Beacon, a conservative site based in Washington, D.C., confirmed that it hired the firm Fusion GPS to unearth damaging information about President Donald Trump in the run-up to the election. GOP donor and billionaire Paul Singer is one of the site’s key backers. Associated...
This guy admitted he lied. That just confirms that this IS just Russian disinformation.
To be dismissed.
hhahah I am not sure what your first link is suppose to prove....yes Clinton paid Michael Steele (a foreign agent), who paid Russians for the disinformationNo. Clinton didn't pay the Russians for anything. Why do we keep recycling these lies?
How the anti-Trump dossier came to be
The Washington Free Beacon, a conservative site based in Washington, D.C., confirmed that it hired the firm Fusion GPS to unearth damaging information about President Donald Trump in the run-up to the election. GOP donor and billionaire Paul Singer is one of the site’s key backers. Associated...
This guy admitted he lied. That just confirms that this IS just Russian disinformation.
To be dismissed.
www.politico.com
No it's not a forgone conclusion.Giving up on reality is a forgone conclusion with any partisan. The ludicrous notion that one side or one party owns all the evil is the way those who pull the puppet strings for all partisans keep firm control of the clueless masses. This includes you.
Despite your intellectual condescencion which you somehow imagine places you in the spectator's box you have described not only your opponents but also yourself with your self adulating cleverness.
Jo
Last week.Nah. I have a feeling this will be rather common. Just goes to show. There are always people who like an echo chamber more than actually voicing opinions it doesn't matter what the ideological leaning is. Funny thing is I rarely talk to people I agree with. Never really see the point.
Yesterday.While it's true she might not have ruined her case, you can't say for sure she didn't either.
If the reporting is true. And it can be proven she made false statements in her reply to the court about when this relationship started. This will have severe consequences for her personally. Both professionally and possibly even criminally.
You will find me conceding points, and even reverse my position when it becomes untenable.You are right not the best analogy.
What's this, then?So you've bought the lie and nothing's going to move you off that. Noted. She didn't pay the Russians for anything. Her campaign did receive the dossier.
However, she didn't use the information in it. Had she done so, she probably would have won the 2016 election.
www.cnn.com
So you think the Durham Special Council Report was alternate reality or a conspiracy theory.That’s because you believe alternate realities and conspiracy theories that the FBI refuses to comply with.
abcnews.go.com
I think it produced nothing. Two BS "indictments". No convictions. A giant waste of taxpayer dollars.So you think the Durham Special Council Report was alternate reality or a conspiracy theory.
After 4-year probe, Durham report slams FBI for actions in 2016 Russia investigation
The DOJ released special counsel John Durham's final report examining the origins of the investigation into former President Trump's 2016 campaign and its ties to Russia.
snip
"Our investigation ... revealed that senior FBI personnel displayed a serious lack of analytical rigor toward the information that they received, especially information received from politically affiliated persons and entities," Durham wrote in his report. "In particular, there was significant reliance on investigative leads provided or funded (directly or indirectly) by Trump's political opponents. The Department did not adequately examine or question these materials and the motivations of those providing them before opening a full-scale investigation."
In his final report, Durham alleges that the investigation into Trump in its early days was handled differently from how the FBI approached prior matters, including allegations of "foreign election interference plans" purportedly aimed at Hillary Clinton's 2016 presidential campaign, which Durham's team also examined.
"In short, it is the Office's assessment that the FBI discounted or willfully ignored material information that did not support the narrative of a collusive relationship between Trump and Russia," the report says. "An objective and honest assessment of these strands of information should have caused the FBI to question not only the predication for Crossfire Hurricane, but also to reflect on whether the FBI was being manipulated for political or other purposes. Unfortunately, it did not."
While Durham does not appear to say outright that the FBI's Russia investigation should not have been launched, he strongly suggests that is the case -- while using sharp language to admonish former FBI leadership and agents and describing his findings as "sobering."
In a statement issued in response to the report, FBI officials said, "The conduct in 2016 and 2017 that Special Counsel Durham examined was the reason that current FBI leadership already implemented dozens of corrective actions, which have now been in place for some time. Had those reforms been in place in 2016, the missteps identified in the report could have been prevented. This report reinforces the importance of ensuring the FBI continues to do its work with the rigor, objectivity, and professionalism the American people deserve and rightly expect."
And? They fined her. Yay. They paid the original org that ordered the dossier. BTW, large portions of that doc have been verified (wonder where Putin has the pee-pee tape?).What's this, then?
"FEC fines Hillary Clinton campaign and DNC over Trump-Russia dossier research"
FEC fines Hillary Clinton campaign and DNC over Trump-Russia dossier research | CNN Politics
Federal election regulators fined Hillary Clinton's 2016 presidential campaign and the Democratic National Committee earlier this month for not properly disclosing the money they spent on controversial opposition research that led to the infamous Trump-Russia dossier.
She got fined. Too bad she didn't use that info to burn Trump to the ground.hhahah I am not sure what your first link is suppose to prove....yes Clinton paid Michael Steele (a foreign agent), who paid Russians for the disinformation
Clinton and the DNC in fact also violated campaign fin laws by paying them
Federal campaign watchdog fines DNC, Clinton campaign over dossier spending disclosure
The conciliation agreements found “probable cause to believe” that both the campaign and national party “misreport[ed] the purpose of certain disbursements.”
Federal campaign watchdog fines DNC, Clinton campaign over dossier spending disclosure
The conciliation agreements found “probable cause to believe” that both the campaign and national party “misreport[ed] the purpose of certain disbursements.”
She would have if she could have, jackass.She got fined. Too bad she didn't use that info to burn Trump to the ground.
Impeachment's not easy when the Catholic mafia, like 'Tater as one of its members, enjoys genuflectors coming across the border, while 'Tater's puppetmaster, the CIA applauds the debauchery. So if it's not this crap, it's Anthony Fauci's, (the Jesuit Elf's), cover-up of SARS2, another major degradational debauchery flowing into America. It's not possible to simply fire all of these psychopaths at once."
FBI Recorded Joe Biden's Brother During Bribery Probe"
Joe can be removed for failing to uphold The Constitution just with this immigration stuff.
I was wondering when someone would FINALLY get around to this.Great headline: "Ex-Informant Accused of Lying About Bidens Said He Had Russian Contacts"
Reminds me that Muller said Trump and others were misrepresenting what he found in the way of dealings with Russia.
We always seem to come back to Russia, with the Trump people/Biden haters.
Prove me wrong, if you disagree.
real news org: Ex-Informant Accused of Lying About Bidens Said He Had Russian Contacts
Federal prosecutors portrayed the former informant, Alexander Smirnov, 43, as a serial liar incapable of telling the truth about even the most basic details of his own life.
A former F.B.I. informant accused of making false bribery claims about President Biden and his son Hunter — which were widely publicized by Republicans — claimed to have been fed information by Russian intelligence, according to a court filing on Tuesday.
In the memo, prosecutors portrayed the former informant, Alexander Smirnov, 43, as a serial liar incapable of telling the truth about even the most basic details of his own life. But Mr. Smirnov told federal investigators that “officials associated with Russian intelligence were involved in passing a story” about Hunter Biden.
Those disclosures, including Mr. Smirnov’s unverifiable claim that he met with Russian intelligence officials as recently as three months ago, made him a flight risk and endangered national security, Justice Department officials said. Mr. Smirnov had been held in custody in Las Vegas, where he has lived since 2022, since his arrest last week.
