CrusaderFrank
Diamond Member
- May 20, 2009
- 153,079
- 78,298
- 2,645
No, I gave an example of selection.
No you didn't. You said "laws of physics" then pointed to gravity as the agent binding molecules into proteins and proteins into cells
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
No, I gave an example of selection.
A bizarre lie. I pointed to selection "selecting for" the spheroidical shape of massive objects.No you didn't. You said "laws of physics" then pointed to gravity as the agent binding molecules into proteins and proteins into cells
A bizarre lie. I pointed to selection "selecting for" the spheroidical shape of massive objects.
Loaded question ignored. Frank, you have a lot of catching up to do before asking questions of educated people.What force of nature does this imaginary "selecting" It's gravity, right?
Loaded question ignored. Frank, you have a lot of catching up to do before asking questions of educated people.
*To people abjectly ignorant of the topicOdd, it's as if you know your answers just don't make any sense.
*To people abjectly ignorant of the topic
In other words, you don't understand these concepts. But that is somehow everyone else's fault.^ Ignoring the life raft I'm tossing...keep flailing about "selection" and "randomness"
In other words, you don't understand these concepts. But that is somehow everyone else's fault.
No, because there could still be creation. Magical gods could still have created the universe, even if everything I say is true. Or maybe it was leprechauns.I understand your explanations are just a reflexive reaction to the idea that we are in a Creation.
No, because there could still be creation. Magical gods could still have created the universe, even if everything I say is true. Or maybe it was leprechauns.
So as usual your accusations are more true of yourself than of anyone else. You are responding reflexively and vapidly, because you erroneously think someone is arguing agavalidly, fetish idea of creation. When they are not.
What a goofy word salad.See? Your mockery makes you look and sound foolish.
It's all random is a mathematical IMPOSSIBILITY and couple that with the self awareness, well IMPOSSIBLE SQUARED.
Horseshit.It is mathematically impossible for random events to have created the first cell.
Oh look, another rocket scientist.NO! That would be random. You said there is a "Selection" process, who is doing the selecting? Random, inorganic molecules and proteins do not make selections
You sound exactly like one of those dumbass leftards in the other thread.See? Your mockery makes you look and sound foolish.
It's all random is a mathematical IMPOSSIBILITY and couple that with the self awareness, well IMPOSSIBLE SQUARED.
A better way of thinking of it is that successful traits are those better adapted to the changing environment so you have a matrix of two variables: both random mutations and the changing planet, so, traits conducive to succeeding tend to survive and go on while traits contrary to better success tend to cancel out.If the cornerstone of evolution is the extinction of species with 'undesirable traits'
Because we are idiots. Guilty liberals tends to see changes to the planet which we may contribute to as being "unnatural" so try to "fix" it by "saving" them. I suppose the good in that is if we can save a plant or a species artificially, at least they are around to study and learn from.why do we go out of our way to save people who have these traits?
We’re talking about the impossibility of random events making life. Nothing anyone said here “blows that out of the water”You sound exactly like one of those dumbass leftards in the other thread.
You obviously don't know anything, so why don't you just read and absorb instead of making unsupportable statements?
There's at least three people here that know what they're talking about. How about you listen to them?
You might try reading the rest of the thread, the "mathematical impossibility" bit has already been blown out of the water.
walk me through the random process by which molecules make proteins which then randomly assemble themselves into fully functional cells.Horseshit.
Where did you hear anything so amazingly stupid?
We’re talking about the impossibility of random events making life.
Nothing anyone said here “blows that out of the water”
Dude - read the fucking thread.walk me through the random process by which molecules make proteins which then randomly assemble themselves into fully functional cells.
If it’s random, it’s like a poker game for no money where 7 2 is as good a hand as pocket Aces.