Evidence of Election Fraud LIVE in Michigan

[HereWeGoAgain]

You can stop calling them “hearings”. Because they’re little more than press conferences.

That AZ certification yesterday really bit you in the ass huh?

They are hearings.

If you don't want to watch, stay away. No one is forcing you to be ignorant.

Just stop screaming "NO EVIDENCE!" then, when hours and hours of evidence is being presented every day, by top ranking professionals. Screaming lalala and pretending what happened didn't happen will make anyone look inhumanely stupid. More apelike than manlike...

Hearings include both sides of the issue. Are the voting officials and clerks and people who counted those votes and actually used those machines also there to testify? If so, it's informative. If not, it's another Trump and Rudy show.

So where are the dems denying the accusations?

Exactly. Where are they? At REAL hearings, qualified people are invited to inform. You can't just walk into one of these things and grab the microphone. It's well orchestrated.

So you watched it. Were there voting officials there to explain what they say happened? Have they got another math professor to dispute huge mathematical " anomalies?" These hearings are Salem. But fortunately, not everyone ate the ergot.

No one said they had to be there.
That doesnt stop them from responding to the accusations.
Which they havent.

 

[Eric Arthur Blair]

Hours and hours of "evidence" presented to the clown circus, minutes and minutes of evidence presented to the courts.

You know the Supreme Court of America is not like a Chinese restaurant where you can just walk in and get
service anytime you want, don't you? I guess you probably don't know that based on an unending string
of erroneous posts from you that try to act like you are making a great point every single time.

 

[Bootney Lee Farnsworth]

FAKE NEWS TRIGGER WARNING

Disputing Trump, Barr says no widespread election fraud

Disputing President Donald Trump’s persistent, baseless claims, Attorney General William Barr declared Tuesday the U.S. Justice Department has uncovered no evidence of widespread voter fraud that could change the outcome of the 2020 election. Barr's comments, in an interview with the The...

www.yahoo.com

...that the Justice Department has not uncovered.....

....the Justice Department...uncovered....

....THE JUSTICE DEPARTMENT....

Well, in that case.....there no evidence, right?



Glad you're not my lawyer. Jesus.

 

[Bootney Lee Farnsworth]

So you watched it. Were there voting officials there to explain what they say happened?

Bring them on. PLEASE explain to us what happened. For fuck's sake.

Have they got another math professor to dispute huge mathematical " anomalies?"

Exactly!!!! Where is their expert witness? So far......NOTHING but gaslighting.

These hearings are Salem. But fortunately, not everyone ate the ergot.

These hearings are "Salem" because THE PERPS ARE NOT DEFENDING THEMSELVES!!!!

 

[OldLady]

You can stop calling them “hearings”. Because they’re little more than press conferences.

That AZ certification yesterday really bit you in the ass huh?

They are hearings.

If you don't want to watch, stay away. No one is forcing you to be ignorant.

Just stop screaming "NO EVIDENCE!" then, when hours and hours of evidence is being presented every day, by top ranking professionals. Screaming lalala and pretending what happened didn't happen will make anyone look inhumanely stupid. More apelike than manlike...

Hearings include both sides of the issue. Are the voting officials and clerks and people who counted those votes and actually used those machines also there to testify? If so, it's informative. If not, it's another Trump and Rudy show.

So where are the dems denying the accusations?

Exactly. Where are they? At REAL hearings, qualified people are invited to inform. You can't just walk into one of these things and grab the microphone. It's well orchestrated.

So you watched it. Were there voting officials there to explain what they say happened? Have they got another math professor to dispute huge mathematical " anomalies?" These hearings are Salem. But fortunately, not everyone ate the ergot.

No one said they had to be there.
That doesnt stop them from responding to the accusations.
Which they havent.

Since everyone is referring to general "allegations" and unspecified "affidavits," I can't counter that. But there have been hundreds of detailed articles that do counter specific allegations. And there have been numerous, specific statements by people who know, from Secretaries of State to the Director of the FBI, that there is no evidence of widespread fraud.

 

[Norman]

You can stop calling them “hearings”. Because they’re little more than press conferences.

That AZ certification yesterday really bit you in the ass huh?

They are hearings.

If you don't want to watch, stay away. No one is forcing you to be ignorant.

Just stop screaming "NO EVIDENCE!" then, when hours and hours of evidence is being presented every day, by top ranking professionals. Screaming lalala and pretending what happened didn't happen will make anyone look inhumanely stupid. More apelike than manlike...

Hearings include both sides of the issue. Are the voting officials and clerks and people who counted those votes and actually used those machines also there to testify? If so, it's informative. If not, it's another Trump and Rudy show.

So where are the dems denying the accusations?

Exactly. Where are they? At REAL hearings, qualified people are invited to inform. You can't just walk into one of these things and grab the microphone. It's well orchestrated.

So you watched it. Were there voting officials there to explain what they say happened? Have they got another math professor to dispute huge mathematical " anomalies?" These hearings are Salem. But fortunately, not everyone ate the ergot.

No one said they had to be there.
That doesnt stop them from responding to the accusations.
Which they havent.

Since everyone is referring to general "allegations" and unspecified "affidavits," I can't counter that. But there have been hundreds of detailed articles that do counter specific allegations. And there have been numerous, specific statements by people who know, from Secretaries of State to the Director of the FBI, that there is no evidence of widespread fraud.

Then you can perhaps start by explaining the 0.0% ballot rejection rate and the astronomical spike at Wisconsin, as well as the midnight vote counting stops... and why poll watchers were not allowed in.

Basic questions that do not have credible answers.

Also, suspect as hell are the 11 million more votes for Biden than Obama. The worst candidate ever gets that many votes? No, not proof, but suspect...

 

[iceberg]

You can stop calling them “hearings”. Because they’re little more than press conferences.

That AZ certification yesterday really bit you in the ass huh?

They are hearings.

If you don't want to watch, stay away. No one is forcing you to be ignorant.

Just stop screaming "NO EVIDENCE!" then, when hours and hours of evidence is being presented every day, by top ranking professionals. Screaming lalala and pretending what happened didn't happen will make anyone look inhumanely stupid. More apelike than manlike...

Hearings include both sides of the issue. Are the voting officials and clerks and people who counted those votes and actually used those machines also there to testify? If so, it's informative. If not, it's another Trump and Rudy show.

So where are the dems denying the accusations?

Exactly. Where are they? At REAL hearings, qualified people are invited to inform. You can't just walk into one of these things and grab the microphone. It's well orchestrated.

So you watched it. Were there voting officials there to explain what they say happened? Have they got another math professor to dispute huge mathematical " anomalies?" These hearings are Salem. But fortunately, not everyone ate the ergot.

No one said they had to be there.
That doesnt stop them from responding to the accusations.
Which they havent.

Since everyone is referring to general "allegations" and unspecified "affidavits," I can't counter that. But there have been hundreds of detailed articles that do counter specific allegations. And there have been numerous, specific statements by people who know, from Secretaries of State to the Director of the FBI, that there is no evidence of widespread fraud.

well there used to be no evidence of fraud so it's now "widespread".

how do we define "widespread"?

defining the terms seems to be the issue here. everyone is under their own impression of what this means.

 

[Norman]

You can stop calling them “hearings”. Because they’re little more than press conferences.

That AZ certification yesterday really bit you in the ass huh?

They are hearings.

If you don't want to watch, stay away. No one is forcing you to be ignorant.

Just stop screaming "NO EVIDENCE!" then, when hours and hours of evidence is being presented every day, by top ranking professionals. Screaming lalala and pretending what happened didn't happen will make anyone look inhumanely stupid. More apelike than manlike...

Hearings include both sides of the issue. Are the voting officials and clerks and people who counted those votes and actually used those machines also there to testify? If so, it's informative. If not, it's another Trump and Rudy show.

So where are the dems denying the accusations?

Exactly. Where are they? At REAL hearings, qualified people are invited to inform. You can't just walk into one of these things and grab the microphone. It's well orchestrated.

So you watched it. Were there voting officials there to explain what they say happened? Have they got another math professor to dispute huge mathematical " anomalies?" These hearings are Salem. But fortunately, not everyone ate the ergot.

No one said they had to be there.
That doesnt stop them from responding to the accusations.
Which they havent.

Since everyone is referring to general "allegations" and unspecified "affidavits," I can't counter that. But there have been hundreds of detailed articles that do counter specific allegations. And there have been numerous, specific statements by people who know, from Secretaries of State to the Director of the FBI, that there is no evidence of widespread fraud.

well there used to be no evidence of fraud so it's now "widespread".

how do we define "widespread"?

defining the terms seems to be the issue here. everyone is under their own impression of what this means.

The definition of widespread is... if it is done by Russia and for Trump.

 

[iceberg]

You can stop calling them “hearings”. Because they’re little more than press conferences.

That AZ certification yesterday really bit you in the ass huh?

They are hearings.

If you don't want to watch, stay away. No one is forcing you to be ignorant.

Just stop screaming "NO EVIDENCE!" then, when hours and hours of evidence is being presented every day, by top ranking professionals. Screaming lalala and pretending what happened didn't happen will make anyone look inhumanely stupid. More apelike than manlike...

Hearings include both sides of the issue. Are the voting officials and clerks and people who counted those votes and actually used those machines also there to testify? If so, it's informative. If not, it's another Trump and Rudy show.

So where are the dems denying the accusations?

Exactly. Where are they? At REAL hearings, qualified people are invited to inform. You can't just walk into one of these things and grab the microphone. It's well orchestrated.

So you watched it. Were there voting officials there to explain what they say happened? Have they got another math professor to dispute huge mathematical " anomalies?" These hearings are Salem. But fortunately, not everyone ate the ergot.

No one said they had to be there.
That doesnt stop them from responding to the accusations.
Which they havent.

Since everyone is referring to general "allegations" and unspecified "affidavits," I can't counter that. But there have been hundreds of detailed articles that do counter specific allegations. And there have been numerous, specific statements by people who know, from Secretaries of State to the Director of the FBI, that there is no evidence of widespread fraud.

Then you can perhaps start by explaining the 0.0% ballot rejection rate and the astronomical spike at Wisconsin, as well as the midnight vote counting stops... and why poll watchers were not allowed in.

Basic questions that do not have credible answers.

Also, suspect as hell are the 11 million more votes for Biden than Obama. The worst candidate ever gets that many votes? No, not proof, but suspect...

and i'd like to be specific as people *are* just shouting generic statements.

In key swing states this year, mail-in ballot rejections plummeted from 2016 rates

Rates are below historical average and significantly less than most recent presidential election.

justthenews.com

Georgia Early Voting Statistics

2020 rejection rates:

Mail Ballots Rejected: 2,689
Mail Ballot Rejection Rate: 0.2%

in 2016:
In Georgia, for instance — a state in which Democrat Joe Biden has eked out a surprise lead of fewer than 20,000 votes over Donald Trump — the rejection rate in 2016 was a whopping 6.4%

wow - this means 1% would be 13,445 votes. or, 1.344,500 votes and 1,341,811 got through. at a 6.4% rejection rate, that would be 80k votes that are "in question" based on the last run rate.

we drop 6.2%? please show me any other state in any other election which had this type of abnormality.

given Biden won by 12,670 votes, this is huge. like it or not. well, if we're really dealing in facts that is.

 

[iceberg]

You can stop calling them “hearings”. Because they’re little more than press conferences.

That AZ certification yesterday really bit you in the ass huh?

They are hearings.

If you don't want to watch, stay away. No one is forcing you to be ignorant.

Just stop screaming "NO EVIDENCE!" then, when hours and hours of evidence is being presented every day, by top ranking professionals. Screaming lalala and pretending what happened didn't happen will make anyone look inhumanely stupid. More apelike than manlike...

Hearings include both sides of the issue. Are the voting officials and clerks and people who counted those votes and actually used those machines also there to testify? If so, it's informative. If not, it's another Trump and Rudy show.

So where are the dems denying the accusations?

Exactly. Where are they? At REAL hearings, qualified people are invited to inform. You can't just walk into one of these things and grab the microphone. It's well orchestrated.

So you watched it. Were there voting officials there to explain what they say happened? Have they got another math professor to dispute huge mathematical " anomalies?" These hearings are Salem. But fortunately, not everyone ate the ergot.

No one said they had to be there.
That doesnt stop them from responding to the accusations.
Which they havent.

Since everyone is referring to general "allegations" and unspecified "affidavits," I can't counter that. But there have been hundreds of detailed articles that do counter specific allegations. And there have been numerous, specific statements by people who know, from Secretaries of State to the Director of the FBI, that there is no evidence of widespread fraud.

well there used to be no evidence of fraud so it's now "widespread".

how do we define "widespread"?

defining the terms seems to be the issue here. everyone is under their own impression of what this means.

The definition of widespread is... if it is done by Russia and for Trump.

if that is how she wishes to define it, fine. i'm willing to use any agreed upon standard to try and use that to all sides on the issue as that is the only fair way i see to do it.

but i'll wait for her reply if she wishes to talk about it. if not i'll move on.

 

[OldLady]

So you watched it. Were there voting officials there to explain what they say happened?

Bring them on. PLEASE explain to us what happened. For fuck's sake.

Have they got another math professor to dispute huge mathematical " anomalies?"

Exactly!!!! Where is their expert witness? So far......NOTHING but gaslighting.

These hearings are Salem. But fortunately, not everyone ate the ergot.

These hearings are "Salem" because THE PERPS ARE NOT DEFENDING THEMSELVES!!!!

Oh my God, your bubble is truly hermetically sealed. Get better news sources. Or try Google. Listen to the MSM for half an hour. They have been on top of these allegations from the start.

The Trump team has thrown the whole pot of spaghetti against the wall in hopes something will stick. But if you focus on one claim at a time, you will see it has already been explained. Even the FBI is saying there is no evidence the Dominion system was manipulated to commit fraud. And Barr says they've been looking.

 

[iceberg]

So you watched it. Were there voting officials there to explain what they say happened?

Bring them on. PLEASE explain to us what happened. For fuck's sake.

Have they got another math professor to dispute huge mathematical " anomalies?"

Exactly!!!! Where is their expert witness? So far......NOTHING but gaslighting.

These hearings are Salem. But fortunately, not everyone ate the ergot.

These hearings are "Salem" because THE PERPS ARE NOT DEFENDING THEMSELVES!!!!

Oh my God, your bubble is truly hermetically sealed. Get better news sources. Or try Google. Listen to the MSM for half an hour. They have been on top of these allegations from the start.

The Trump team has thrown the whole pot of spaghetti against the wall in hopes something will stick. But if you focus on one claim at a time, you will see it has already been explained. Even the FBI is saying there is no evidence the Dominion system was manipulated to commit fraud. And Barr says they've been looking.

whole pot of spaghetti - wouldn't RUSSIA, Kavanaugh, impeach 45 and so much be interpreted the same way by the right? not asking you to agree or disagree, just see if that same statement could apply about what the left has done for 4 years.

and these days i use multiple search engines. google alone gives you what google wants to give you.

 

[Norman]

So you watched it. Were there voting officials there to explain what they say happened?

Bring them on. PLEASE explain to us what happened. For fuck's sake.

Have they got another math professor to dispute huge mathematical " anomalies?"

Exactly!!!! Where is their expert witness? So far......NOTHING but gaslighting.

These hearings are Salem. But fortunately, not everyone ate the ergot.

These hearings are "Salem" because THE PERPS ARE NOT DEFENDING THEMSELVES!!!!

Oh my God, your bubble is truly hermetically sealed. Get better news sources. Or try Google. Listen to the MSM for half an hour. They have been on top of these allegations from the start.

The Trump team has thrown the whole pot of spaghetti against the wall in hopes something will stick. But if you focus on one claim at a time, you will see it has already been explained. Even the FBI is saying there is no evidence the Dominion system was manipulated to commit fraud. And Barr says they've been looking.

The MSM has been lying from the start, including before the election. Their polls were complete garbage, they can't do proper analysis because they are highly biased, if not downright evil.

Dominion system is the weakest of the claims of fraud.

 

[Norman]

So you watched it. Were there voting officials there to explain what they say happened?

Bring them on. PLEASE explain to us what happened. For fuck's sake.

Have they got another math professor to dispute huge mathematical " anomalies?"

Exactly!!!! Where is their expert witness? So far......NOTHING but gaslighting.

These hearings are Salem. But fortunately, not everyone ate the ergot.

These hearings are "Salem" because THE PERPS ARE NOT DEFENDING THEMSELVES!!!!

Oh my God, your bubble is truly hermetically sealed. Get better news sources. Or try Google. Listen to the MSM for half an hour. They have been on top of these allegations from the start.

The Trump team has thrown the whole pot of spaghetti against the wall in hopes something will stick. But if you focus on one claim at a time, you will see it has already been explained. Even the FBI is saying there is no evidence the Dominion system was manipulated to commit fraud. And Barr says they've been looking.

whole pot of spaghetti - wouldn't RUSSIA, Kavanaugh, impeach 45 and so much be interpreted the same way by the right? not asking you to agree or disagree, just see if that same statement could apply about what the left has done for 4 years.

and these days i use multiple search engines. google alone gives you what google wants to give you.

The news industry has completely discredited itself. To be fair, they probably always were trying to manipulate people and not provide the news... but when it doesn't go their way that's when they turn full insane and lose all semblance of objectivity.

 

[HereWeGoAgain]

You can stop calling them “hearings”. Because they’re little more than press conferences.

That AZ certification yesterday really bit you in the ass huh?

They are hearings.

If you don't want to watch, stay away. No one is forcing you to be ignorant.

Just stop screaming "NO EVIDENCE!" then, when hours and hours of evidence is being presented every day, by top ranking professionals. Screaming lalala and pretending what happened didn't happen will make anyone look inhumanely stupid. More apelike than manlike...

Hearings include both sides of the issue. Are the voting officials and clerks and people who counted those votes and actually used those machines also there to testify? If so, it's informative. If not, it's another Trump and Rudy show.

So where are the dems denying the accusations?

Exactly. Where are they? At REAL hearings, qualified people are invited to inform. You can't just walk into one of these things and grab the microphone. It's well orchestrated.

So you watched it. Were there voting officials there to explain what they say happened? Have they got another math professor to dispute huge mathematical " anomalies?" These hearings are Salem. But fortunately, not everyone ate the ergot.

No one said they had to be there.
That doesnt stop them from responding to the accusations.
Which they havent.

Since everyone is referring to general "allegations" and unspecified "affidavits," I can't counter that. But there have been hundreds of detailed articles that do counter specific allegations. And there have been numerous, specific statements by people who know, from Secretaries of State to the Director of the FBI, that there is no evidence of widespread fraud.

You're gonna have to supply some links.

 

[OldLady]

So you watched it. Were there voting officials there to explain what they say happened?

Bring them on. PLEASE explain to us what happened. For fuck's sake.

Have they got another math professor to dispute huge mathematical " anomalies?"

Exactly!!!! Where is their expert witness? So far......NOTHING but gaslighting.

These hearings are Salem. But fortunately, not everyone ate the ergot.

These hearings are "Salem" because THE PERPS ARE NOT DEFENDING THEMSELVES!!!!

Oh my God, your bubble is truly hermetically sealed. Get better news sources. Or try Google. Listen to the MSM for half an hour. They have been on top of these allegations from the start.

The Trump team has thrown the whole pot of spaghetti against the wall in hopes something will stick. But if you focus on one claim at a time, you will see it has already been explained. Even the FBI is saying there is no evidence the Dominion system was manipulated to commit fraud. And Barr says they've been looking.

The MSM has been lying from the start, including before the election. Their polls were complete garbage, they can't do proper analysis because they are highly biased, if not downright evil.

Dominion system is the weakest of the claims of fraud.

Well it's the only one left standing in court.

You can stop calling them “hearings”. Because they’re little more than press conferences.

That AZ certification yesterday really bit you in the ass huh?

They are hearings.

If you don't want to watch, stay away. No one is forcing you to be ignorant.

Just stop screaming "NO EVIDENCE!" then, when hours and hours of evidence is being presented every day, by top ranking professionals. Screaming lalala and pretending what happened didn't happen will make anyone look inhumanely stupid. More apelike than manlike...

Hearings include both sides of the issue. Are the voting officials and clerks and people who counted those votes and actually used those machines also there to testify? If so, it's informative. If not, it's another Trump and Rudy show.

So where are the dems denying the accusations?

Exactly. Where are they? At REAL hearings, qualified people are invited to inform. You can't just walk into one of these things and grab the microphone. It's well orchestrated.

So you watched it. Were there voting officials there to explain what they say happened? Have they got another math professor to dispute huge mathematical " anomalies?" These hearings are Salem. But fortunately, not everyone ate the ergot.

No one said they had to be there.
That doesnt stop them from responding to the accusations.
Which they havent.

Since everyone is referring to general "allegations" and unspecified "affidavits," I can't counter that. But there have been hundreds of detailed articles that do counter specific allegations. And there have been numerous, specific statements by people who know, from Secretaries of State to the Director of the FBI, that there is no evidence of widespread fraud.

You're gonna have to supply some links.

You gonna read them? You'll have to pass a quiz, yannow.

 

[Dragonlady]

December 14 can't come soon enough.

Yeah. This is becoming pretty tedious, especially since it's clear that no one in the GOP is going to step in.

The fact that you can sit there and listen to the guy talking right now and dismiss it makes you so fucking partisan that I don't ever want to hear you talk about "wingers" again. You are one.

I'm not listening. There are two sides to every story, and I'm not going to burn the time.

I'm happy to wait for the final score.

But you can continue with whatever it is you're doing.

TRANSLATION: I will wait for what the MSM tells me and accept it without question.

You're a bright one.

We'll see who's up there on Inauguration Day.

That'll be the final score. I'm patient.

Even if election fraud did it?

You certainly had no difficulty installing Donald Trump as President, even in the light of widespread Russian election interference and voter suppression.

 

[iceberg]

So you watched it. Were there voting officials there to explain what they say happened?

Bring them on. PLEASE explain to us what happened. For fuck's sake.

Have they got another math professor to dispute huge mathematical " anomalies?"

Exactly!!!! Where is their expert witness? So far......NOTHING but gaslighting.

These hearings are Salem. But fortunately, not everyone ate the ergot.

These hearings are "Salem" because THE PERPS ARE NOT DEFENDING THEMSELVES!!!!

Oh my God, your bubble is truly hermetically sealed. Get better news sources. Or try Google. Listen to the MSM for half an hour. They have been on top of these allegations from the start.

The Trump team has thrown the whole pot of spaghetti against the wall in hopes something will stick. But if you focus on one claim at a time, you will see it has already been explained. Even the FBI is saying there is no evidence the Dominion system was manipulated to commit fraud. And Barr says they've been looking.

whole pot of spaghetti - wouldn't RUSSIA, Kavanaugh, impeach 45 and so much be interpreted the same way by the right? not asking you to agree or disagree, just see if that same statement could apply about what the left has done for 4 years.

and these days i use multiple search engines. google alone gives you what google wants to give you.

The news industry has completely discredited itself. To be fair, they probably always were trying to manipulate people and not provide the news... but when it doesn't go their way that's when they turn full insane and lose all semblance of objectivity.

it's gotten worse along the way. my minor was in journalism and i know the rules. i know today you have pissed off computer idiots blogging NO THIS IS WHAT IS HAPPENING and others saying SEE HE FEELS LIKE I DO.

i know ads are a bitch to sell on straight news so they become "entertainment" to make money. that won't last forever and a day of validation and reckoning is coming. the more they push emotions as fact, the faster we head to that cliff.

we either figure it out and stop, or we fall off and there goes america.

if we had both the left and right minded people in a plane deep in a nose dive into a mountain and all they had to do was agree THIS is a problem, they'd die.

this is where we are today. we can't even determine together if our election system is crap or not.

 

[Norman]

So you watched it. Were there voting officials there to explain what they say happened?

Bring them on. PLEASE explain to us what happened. For fuck's sake.

Have they got another math professor to dispute huge mathematical " anomalies?"

Exactly!!!! Where is their expert witness? So far......NOTHING but gaslighting.

These hearings are Salem. But fortunately, not everyone ate the ergot.

These hearings are "Salem" because THE PERPS ARE NOT DEFENDING THEMSELVES!!!!

Oh my God, your bubble is truly hermetically sealed. Get better news sources. Or try Google. Listen to the MSM for half an hour. They have been on top of these allegations from the start.

The Trump team has thrown the whole pot of spaghetti against the wall in hopes something will stick. But if you focus on one claim at a time, you will see it has already been explained. Even the FBI is saying there is no evidence the Dominion system was manipulated to commit fraud. And Barr says they've been looking.

The MSM has been lying from the start, including before the election. Their polls were complete garbage, they can't do proper analysis because they are highly biased, if not downright evil.

Dominion system is the weakest of the claims of fraud.

Well it's the only one left standing in court.

You can stop calling them “hearings”. Because they’re little more than press conferences.

That AZ certification yesterday really bit you in the ass huh?

They are hearings.

If you don't want to watch, stay away. No one is forcing you to be ignorant.

Just stop screaming "NO EVIDENCE!" then, when hours and hours of evidence is being presented every day, by top ranking professionals. Screaming lalala and pretending what happened didn't happen will make anyone look inhumanely stupid. More apelike than manlike...

Hearings include both sides of the issue. Are the voting officials and clerks and people who counted those votes and actually used those machines also there to testify? If so, it's informative. If not, it's another Trump and Rudy show.

So where are the dems denying the accusations?

Exactly. Where are they? At REAL hearings, qualified people are invited to inform. You can't just walk into one of these things and grab the microphone. It's well orchestrated.

So you watched it. Were there voting officials there to explain what they say happened? Have they got another math professor to dispute huge mathematical " anomalies?" These hearings are Salem. But fortunately, not everyone ate the ergot.

No one said they had to be there.
That doesnt stop them from responding to the accusations.
Which they havent.

Since everyone is referring to general "allegations" and unspecified "affidavits," I can't counter that. But there have been hundreds of detailed articles that do counter specific allegations. And there have been numerous, specific statements by people who know, from Secretaries of State to the Director of the FBI, that there is no evidence of widespread fraud.

You're gonna have to supply some links.

You gonna read them? You'll have to pass a quiz, yannow.

No it isn't, not even close...

The Dominion stuff was stupid to even bring to the court, but there are myriad of other cases in court. Dominion stuff is only in the Kraken lawsuit, and it has a lot more stuff than the Dominion...

 

[Dragonlady]

You can stop calling them “hearings”. Because they’re little more than press conferences.

That AZ certification yesterday really bit you in the ass huh?

They are hearings.

If you don't want to watch, stay away. No one is forcing you to be ignorant.

Just stop screaming "NO EVIDENCE!" then, when hours and hours of evidence is being presented every day, by top ranking professionals. Screaming lalala and pretending what happened didn't happen will make anyone look inhumanely stupid. More apelike than manlike...

Hearings include both sides of the issue. Are the voting officials and clerks and people who counted those votes and actually used those machines also there to testify? If so, it's informative. If not, it's another Trump and Rudy show.

So where are the dems denying the accusations?

Exactly. Where are they? At REAL hearings, qualified people are invited to inform. You can't just walk into one of these things and grab the microphone. It's well orchestrated.

So you watched it. Were there voting officials there to explain what they say happened? Have they got another math professor to dispute huge mathematical " anomalies?" These hearings are Salem. But fortunately, not everyone ate the ergot.

No one said they had to be there.
That doesnt stop them from responding to the accusations.
Which they havent.

Since everyone is referring to general "allegations" and unspecified "affidavits," I can't counter that. But there have been hundreds of detailed articles that do counter specific allegations. And there have been numerous, specific statements by people who know, from Secretaries of State to the Director of the FBI, that there is no evidence of widespread fraud.

You're gonna have to supply some links.

You're going to have to learn to use google. Especially when this news is hardly "news" anymore, but rather what those who don't believe Donald Trump know to be the truth.