Tommy Tainant
Diamond Member
- Thread starter
- #101
This is the second paragraph you thick fucker.When Silence Isn’t Golden: How Gag Orders Can Evade First Amendment Protections - Yale Law SchoolJudges in the US have the same powers. Rightly so.I asked you a question. IN your system, can your judge order the jury to be sequesterd?
You didn't ask me, but the answer is no, judges cannot "sequester" juries in the UK. They can issue what you call gag orders while the trial goes on. These are lifted once the trial has concluded.
So, no balance between the right of the public to be informed/ the right of the reporter to operate, and the rights of the accused.
And it just happens to make things easier for the government...
This does not reflect well on the UK.
I've never heard of a reporter in the US being arrested for such a crime. I've heard of many juries being sequestered.
Your blind trust in a government that allows and even actively supports the mass rape of your children, is insane.
You got a point to make, lefty, make it. A link is to SUPPORT your claims, not make them for you.
I cant make you understand it.
Gag orders typically forbid individuals from talking about, publishing, or disseminating specified information. They can be imposed on parties to litigation to stop them from talking to the press, or on the press itself to stop it from publishing certain information.