- Moderator
- #101
The unorganized militia is the problem. Wellness of regulation is the solution. Lowering our tax burden should be a result.that is Your story, story teller. Better aqueducts, better roads, and more well regulated militia is what we need.The conviction could be vacated with good conduct. And, well regulated militia may not be Infringed, when keeping and bearing Arms for their State, or our federales, with the Union.So people convicted of crimes will be trained as militia cops? You do know felons cannot own a gun, right?
And you think good conduct in prison qualifies them as cops? Jeez, thank the gods you don't get to make the rules.
And continually misquoting the 2nd amendment does not, and never will make it "the well regulated militia may not be infringed". The well regulated militia is necessary. The right of the people to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed. No matter how often you say it, "the people" and "militia" are not the same thing.
We only need a well regulated militia when we are attacked. The better aqueducts and roads are built by contractors or by gov't crews. Not a militia.
Militias have a specific purpose. They are not just general labor for whatever projects you decide need it.
Thanks for letting us know, the right wing doesn't really care.
How is hiring more people going to lower the tax burden?
How can you claim using convicts as amateur cops is a solution?
How is using a volunteer militia to build roads and aqueducts going to be good for our nation? They are amateurs at it.
You want to pretend you care, and that is fine. But all you really care about is continuing this insane argument about the 2nd amendment. You don't care about a citizen's ability to defend himself against a criminal. You don't care about the economy. YOu don't care about having an effective law enforcement. You care about your argument, and that is it.