Even The Left Is Waking Up....

[francoHFW]

Trump should send those russians right back here just to spite barry!!!

what kind of security system do you have if you let the Russian hack ya from down town Moscow.
Really???

Heard of the internet? lol

 

[12icer]

I would like to see the reports from the - 17? agencies, and what the agencies are. You liberals and all of the liberal shit in the news and the government lie so much there is NOTHING ANYONE CONNECTED WITH THEM CAN SAY THAT IS BELIEVABLE. They are proven liars, obstructers, thieves, and conspirators. So screw your labeling anyone that tells the truth. Label your stupid selfs as what you are for a change LYING SCUM LIBERAL SHIT, NO honor, NO pride, NO patriotisim, NO humility, and most of all NO RESPECT. Typical liberals. As for the emails, they WERE exactly as everyone said they were, she obstructed justice and got away with felony crimes. Another fact you choose to ignore.

 

[francoHFW]

I would like to see the reports from the - 17? agencies, and what the agencies are. You liberals and all of the liberal shit in the news and the government lie so much there is NOTHING ANYONE CONNECTED WITH THEM CAN SAY THAT IS BELIEVABLE. They are proven liars, obstructers, thieves, and conspirators. So screw your labeling anyone that tells the truth. Label your stupid selfs as what you are for a change LYING SCUM LIBERAL SHIT, NO honor, NO pride, NO patriotisim, NO humility, and most of all NO RESPECT. Typical liberals. As for the emails, they WERE exactly as everyone said they were, she obstructed justice and got away with felony crimes. Another fact you choose to ignore.

IT'S A CONSPIRACEEEEE!!!!!! Like MMGW. You people are fecking morons....

 

[Norman]

....and recognizing not to believe the Democrats, and especially the lying snake in the White House.

Here's "Rolling Stone" calling bs on Obama...


1. "Something About This Russia Story Stinks
....the American press is again asked to co-sign a dubious intelligence assessment

2. ....Obama administration announced a series of sanctions against Russia. Thirty-five Russian nationals will be expelled from the country.

3. President Obama issued a terse statement seeming to blame Russia




4. The New York Times was more aggressive, writing flatly, "Obama Strikes Back at Russia for Election Hacking." It backed up its story with a link to a joint FBI/Homeland Security report that details how Russian civilian and military intelligence services (termed "RIS" in the report) twice breached the defenses of "a U.S. political party," presumably the Democrats.

5. This dramatic story puts the news media in a jackpot. Absent independent verification, reporters will have to rely upon the secret assessments of intelligence agencies to cover the story at all....news agencies seemed split on whether to unequivocally declare that Russian hacking took place, or whether to hedge bets and put it all on the government to make that declaration, using "Obama says" formulations.


6. ...[the FBI/Homeland Security] report is long on jargon but short on specifics. More than half of it is just a list of suggestions for preventive measures.

7. ....we don't learn much at all about what led our government to determine a) that these hacks were directed by the Russian government, or b) they were undertaken with the aim of influencing the election, and in particular to help elect Donald Trump.



8. If the American security agencies had smoking-gun evidence that the Russians had an organized campaign to derail the U.S. presidential election and deliver the White House to Trump, then expelling a few dozen diplomats after the election seems like an oddly weak and ill-timed response. Voices in both parties are saying this now." Taibbi: Something About This Russia Story Stinks




But don't worry....the stupidest among us will continue to believe the malicious, incompetent, dirt-eating low-life back-stabbing crypto-Islamist snake in the White House...


....won't you, Liberals?

Indeed... indeed.

I would change a few terms used in the article though. In place of "something", may I suggest "everything".

There is no proof, just assertions which Obama is smug enough to act on... because feelings of the regressives whose hearts were broken as a result of Trump's presidency are more important to protect than to make sure that there won't be a nuclear conflict. Wikileaks already stated Russia was not its source.

 

[francoHFW]

....and recognizing not to believe the Democrats, and especially the lying snake in the White House.

Here's "Rolling Stone" calling bs on Obama...


1. "Something About This Russia Story Stinks
....the American press is again asked to co-sign a dubious intelligence assessment

2. ....Obama administration announced a series of sanctions against Russia. Thirty-five Russian nationals will be expelled from the country.

3. President Obama issued a terse statement seeming to blame Russia




4. The New York Times was more aggressive, writing flatly, "Obama Strikes Back at Russia for Election Hacking." It backed up its story with a link to a joint FBI/Homeland Security report that details how Russian civilian and military intelligence services (termed "RIS" in the report) twice breached the defenses of "a U.S. political party," presumably the Democrats.

5. This dramatic story puts the news media in a jackpot. Absent independent verification, reporters will have to rely upon the secret assessments of intelligence agencies to cover the story at all....news agencies seemed split on whether to unequivocally declare that Russian hacking took place, or whether to hedge bets and put it all on the government to make that declaration, using "Obama says" formulations.


6. ...[the FBI/Homeland Security] report is long on jargon but short on specifics. More than half of it is just a list of suggestions for preventive measures.

7. ....we don't learn much at all about what led our government to determine a) that these hacks were directed by the Russian government, or b) they were undertaken with the aim of influencing the election, and in particular to help elect Donald Trump.



8. If the American security agencies had smoking-gun evidence that the Russians had an organized campaign to derail the U.S. presidential election and deliver the White House to Trump, then expelling a few dozen diplomats after the election seems like an oddly weak and ill-timed response. Voices in both parties are saying this now." Taibbi: Something About This Russia Story Stinks




But don't worry....the stupidest among us will continue to believe the malicious, incompetent, dirt-eating low-life back-stabbing crypto-Islamist snake in the White House...


....won't you, Liberals?

And 17 intelligence agencies...You need some time off lol...

The same agency's who claimed there were WMD's in Iraq. With a record like that I would think a supposedly smart person like you claim to be would take a closer look at what they are reporting. Clearly you're not as smart as you think you are.

They gave Booosh and Darth a LOT of info- then the a-holes cherry picked bs and Fox etc hyped it for months. Great Job!

 

[francoHFW]

....and recognizing not to believe the Democrats, and especially the lying snake in the White House.

Here's "Rolling Stone" calling bs on Obama...


1. "Something About This Russia Story Stinks
....the American press is again asked to co-sign a dubious intelligence assessment

2. ....Obama administration announced a series of sanctions against Russia. Thirty-five Russian nationals will be expelled from the country.

3. President Obama issued a terse statement seeming to blame Russia




4. The New York Times was more aggressive, writing flatly, "Obama Strikes Back at Russia for Election Hacking." It backed up its story with a link to a joint FBI/Homeland Security report that details how Russian civilian and military intelligence services (termed "RIS" in the report) twice breached the defenses of "a U.S. political party," presumably the Democrats.

5. This dramatic story puts the news media in a jackpot. Absent independent verification, reporters will have to rely upon the secret assessments of intelligence agencies to cover the story at all....news agencies seemed split on whether to unequivocally declare that Russian hacking took place, or whether to hedge bets and put it all on the government to make that declaration, using "Obama says" formulations.


6. ...[the FBI/Homeland Security] report is long on jargon but short on specifics. More than half of it is just a list of suggestions for preventive measures.

7. ....we don't learn much at all about what led our government to determine a) that these hacks were directed by the Russian government, or b) they were undertaken with the aim of influencing the election, and in particular to help elect Donald Trump.



8. If the American security agencies had smoking-gun evidence that the Russians had an organized campaign to derail the U.S. presidential election and deliver the White House to Trump, then expelling a few dozen diplomats after the election seems like an oddly weak and ill-timed response. Voices in both parties are saying this now." Taibbi: Something About This Russia Story Stinks




But don't worry....the stupidest among us will continue to believe the malicious, incompetent, dirt-eating low-life back-stabbing crypto-Islamist snake in the White House...


....won't you, Liberals?

Indeed... indeed.

I would change a few terms used in the article though. In place of "something", may I suggest "everything".

There is no proof, just assertions which Obama is smug enough to act on... because feelings of the regressives whose hearts were broken as a result of Trump's presidency are more important to protect than to make sure that there won't be a nuclear conflict. Wikileaks already stated Russia was not its source.

They can't give away the store to prove it to the idiot GOP duh...IT'S A CONSPIRACEEEEE!!!!!!!!

 

[Norman]

....and recognizing not to believe the Democrats, and especially the lying snake in the White House.

Here's "Rolling Stone" calling bs on Obama...


1. "Something About This Russia Story Stinks
....the American press is again asked to co-sign a dubious intelligence assessment

2. ....Obama administration announced a series of sanctions against Russia. Thirty-five Russian nationals will be expelled from the country.

3. President Obama issued a terse statement seeming to blame Russia




4. The New York Times was more aggressive, writing flatly, "Obama Strikes Back at Russia for Election Hacking." It backed up its story with a link to a joint FBI/Homeland Security report that details how Russian civilian and military intelligence services (termed "RIS" in the report) twice breached the defenses of "a U.S. political party," presumably the Democrats.

5. This dramatic story puts the news media in a jackpot. Absent independent verification, reporters will have to rely upon the secret assessments of intelligence agencies to cover the story at all....news agencies seemed split on whether to unequivocally declare that Russian hacking took place, or whether to hedge bets and put it all on the government to make that declaration, using "Obama says" formulations.


6. ...[the FBI/Homeland Security] report is long on jargon but short on specifics. More than half of it is just a list of suggestions for preventive measures.

7. ....we don't learn much at all about what led our government to determine a) that these hacks were directed by the Russian government, or b) they were undertaken with the aim of influencing the election, and in particular to help elect Donald Trump.



8. If the American security agencies had smoking-gun evidence that the Russians had an organized campaign to derail the U.S. presidential election and deliver the White House to Trump, then expelling a few dozen diplomats after the election seems like an oddly weak and ill-timed response. Voices in both parties are saying this now." Taibbi: Something About This Russia Story Stinks




But don't worry....the stupidest among us will continue to believe the malicious, incompetent, dirt-eating low-life back-stabbing crypto-Islamist snake in the White House...


....won't you, Liberals?

Indeed... indeed.

I would change a few terms used in the article though. In place of "something", may I suggest "everything".

There is no proof, just assertions which Obama is smug enough to act on... because feelings of the regressives whose hearts were broken as a result of Trump's presidency are more important to protect than to make sure that there won't be a nuclear conflict. Wikileaks already stated Russia was not its source.

They can't give away the store to prove it to the idiot GOP duh...IT'S A CONSPIRACEEEEE!!!!!!!!

It indeed is a vast conspiracy theory. That the Russians hacked the elections that is.

And produced by the same guys who consistently tell us that it's impossible to hack elections and election fraud is a myth. There is no bounds to the mental masturbation.

 

[francoHFW]

....and recognizing not to believe the Democrats, and especially the lying snake in the White House.

Here's "Rolling Stone" calling bs on Obama...


1. "Something About This Russia Story Stinks
....the American press is again asked to co-sign a dubious intelligence assessment

2. ....Obama administration announced a series of sanctions against Russia. Thirty-five Russian nationals will be expelled from the country.

3. President Obama issued a terse statement seeming to blame Russia




4. The New York Times was more aggressive, writing flatly, "Obama Strikes Back at Russia for Election Hacking." It backed up its story with a link to a joint FBI/Homeland Security report that details how Russian civilian and military intelligence services (termed "RIS" in the report) twice breached the defenses of "a U.S. political party," presumably the Democrats.

5. This dramatic story puts the news media in a jackpot. Absent independent verification, reporters will have to rely upon the secret assessments of intelligence agencies to cover the story at all....news agencies seemed split on whether to unequivocally declare that Russian hacking took place, or whether to hedge bets and put it all on the government to make that declaration, using "Obama says" formulations.


6. ...[the FBI/Homeland Security] report is long on jargon but short on specifics. More than half of it is just a list of suggestions for preventive measures.

7. ....we don't learn much at all about what led our government to determine a) that these hacks were directed by the Russian government, or b) they were undertaken with the aim of influencing the election, and in particular to help elect Donald Trump.



8. If the American security agencies had smoking-gun evidence that the Russians had an organized campaign to derail the U.S. presidential election and deliver the White House to Trump, then expelling a few dozen diplomats after the election seems like an oddly weak and ill-timed response. Voices in both parties are saying this now." Taibbi: Something About This Russia Story Stinks




But don't worry....the stupidest among us will continue to believe the malicious, incompetent, dirt-eating low-life back-stabbing crypto-Islamist snake in the White House...


....won't you, Liberals?

Indeed... indeed.

I would change a few terms used in the article though. In place of "something", may I suggest "everything".

There is no proof, just assertions which Obama is smug enough to act on... because feelings of the regressives whose hearts were broken as a result of Trump's presidency are more important to protect than to make sure that there won't be a nuclear conflict. Wikileaks already stated Russia was not its source.

They can't give away the store to prove it to the idiot GOP duh...IT'S A CONSPIRACEEEEE!!!!!!!!

It indeed is a vast conspiracy theory. That the Russians hacked the elections that is.

And produced by the same guys who consistently tell us that it's impossible to hack elections and election fraud is a myth. There is no bounds to the mental masturbation.

That's because voting machines aren't connected to the internet duhhhh. Totally different from e-mails.

 

[Rexx Taylor]

so what ever happened to that hot white chick who was hacked in "Psycho"? did she survive with her Obama-Care Plan?

 

[Clementine]

....and recognizing not to believe the Democrats, and especially the lying snake in the White House.

Here's "Rolling Stone" calling bs on Obama...


1. "Something About This Russia Story Stinks
....the American press is again asked to co-sign a dubious intelligence assessment

2. ....Obama administration announced a series of sanctions against Russia. Thirty-five Russian nationals will be expelled from the country.

3. President Obama issued a terse statement seeming to blame Russia




4. The New York Times was more aggressive, writing flatly, "Obama Strikes Back at Russia for Election Hacking." It backed up its story with a link to a joint FBI/Homeland Security report that details how Russian civilian and military intelligence services (termed "RIS" in the report) twice breached the defenses of "a U.S. political party," presumably the Democrats.

5. This dramatic story puts the news media in a jackpot. Absent independent verification, reporters will have to rely upon the secret assessments of intelligence agencies to cover the story at all....news agencies seemed split on whether to unequivocally declare that Russian hacking took place, or whether to hedge bets and put it all on the government to make that declaration, using "Obama says" formulations.


6. ...[the FBI/Homeland Security] report is long on jargon but short on specifics. More than half of it is just a list of suggestions for preventive measures.

7. ....we don't learn much at all about what led our government to determine a) that these hacks were directed by the Russian government, or b) they were undertaken with the aim of influencing the election, and in particular to help elect Donald Trump.



8. If the American security agencies had smoking-gun evidence that the Russians had an organized campaign to derail the U.S. presidential election and deliver the White House to Trump, then expelling a few dozen diplomats after the election seems like an oddly weak and ill-timed response. Voices in both parties are saying this now." Taibbi: Something About This Russia Story Stinks




But don't worry....the stupidest among us will continue to believe the malicious, incompetent, dirt-eating low-life back-stabbing crypto-Islamist snake in the White House...


....won't you, Liberals?

Everything about the story stinks. There is nothing there. We don't even have officials willing to put their name on any supposed statements.

Obama kicking out a few Russians is all for show. With no proof and just flimsy accusations, he is just doing this to try and look tough but it falls flat. He may as well just call Putin a big giant poo poo head.

Once they started with the blame game, they weren't going to back down. Facts never got in the way of liberals and their propaganda. Since there is nothing to support the claims, someone came up with this so-called report that completely lacks substance and in no way gives credibility to the claims of hacking by Russia.

Assange explained this months ago. The insider who helped him was murdered. Assange is hiding and there have been attempts on his life, too. The left needs a major bad guy to lump together with Trump and Assange doesn't fit the bill because he has gone after Republicans in the past.

The left used to love Russia. They know full well that most leftwing radicals love all commie countries. At the same time, they know damn well that the conservatives hate communists. I think they are hoping to chip away at Trump's support by trying to convince the right that Trump is secretly working with Russia. It's not working. The Dems know they can easily fool their own supporters, who believe every ******* thing told to them, but the Republicans are a much tougher sell.

Bottom line is that it isn't working. Russia didn't hack the DNC. No one did. An insider with access leaked information to Assange when he discovered the corruption. He was murdered for his trouble. That is the real story here and the media is going to great lengths to keep the focus off that. They have avoided all the suspicious deaths of those who could hurt Hillary Clinton.

 

[ClosedCaption]

Matt? Mike's kid (Taibbi)? He lived in Russia for a while. Probably drank far too much rotten Vodka.


"Many reporters I know are..." Really? Many? Many that he knows?

"We all remember the WMD fiasco." "It's déjà vu all over again" is how one friend put it.
"Nothing quite adds up"

It all adds up. There were reports of Russian hacking a long time ago. Unlike the WMD fiasco, there is not a section of the intel community saying the intel is being massaged.

Why do people like you the OP want to side with the Russians? Do you hate an American President that much?

Sad. Rally Sad

There's no "siding" at all.


There is not a smidgen of proof of Russian influencing this election any more than there is a smidgen of Obama's either competence or honesty.


But....plenty of evidence that you are a dunce.

He's on to you too. You hated Russia and blamed them for being like nazis just less than a year ago. Now you attempt to side with Russia with the caveat of "who's siding?" Which once you have to ask, you lost. But now that Daddy Trump has defended Russia you, all of a sudden do the same.

All over politics you guys are siding with a hostile foreign nation. Just as the KGB dock head Pooty pool planned it. Good job.

 

[EverCurious]

Yes, we are all Russian spies and we "stole" the election with our US citizenship rights. Best learn to deal with it, because come Jan 20 our "Russian" president is going to take over and ya'll can ***** all you want. ~rolls eyes~

 

[fncceo]

Do you hate an American President that much?

Trump is the American President and he's great.

 

[PoliticalChic]

....and recognizing not to believe the Democrats, and especially the lying snake in the White House.

Here's "Rolling Stone" calling bs on Obama...


1. "Something About This Russia Story Stinks
....the American press is again asked to co-sign a dubious intelligence assessment

2. ....Obama administration announced a series of sanctions against Russia. Thirty-five Russian nationals will be expelled from the country.

3. President Obama issued a terse statement seeming to blame Russia




4. The New York Times was more aggressive, writing flatly, "Obama Strikes Back at Russia for Election Hacking." It backed up its story with a link to a joint FBI/Homeland Security report that details how Russian civilian and military intelligence services (termed "RIS" in the report) twice breached the defenses of "a U.S. political party," presumably the Democrats.

5. This dramatic story puts the news media in a jackpot. Absent independent verification, reporters will have to rely upon the secret assessments of intelligence agencies to cover the story at all....news agencies seemed split on whether to unequivocally declare that Russian hacking took place, or whether to hedge bets and put it all on the government to make that declaration, using "Obama says" formulations.


6. ...[the FBI/Homeland Security] report is long on jargon but short on specifics. More than half of it is just a list of suggestions for preventive measures.

7. ....we don't learn much at all about what led our government to determine a) that these hacks were directed by the Russian government, or b) they were undertaken with the aim of influencing the election, and in particular to help elect Donald Trump.



8. If the American security agencies had smoking-gun evidence that the Russians had an organized campaign to derail the U.S. presidential election and deliver the White House to Trump, then expelling a few dozen diplomats after the election seems like an oddly weak and ill-timed response. Voices in both parties are saying this now." Taibbi: Something About This Russia Story Stinks




But don't worry....the stupidest among us will continue to believe the malicious, incompetent, dirt-eating low-life back-stabbing crypto-Islamist snake in the White House...


....won't you, Liberals?

And 17 intelligence agencies...You need some time off lol...

The same agency's who claimed there were WMD's in Iraq. With a record like that I would think a supposedly smart person like you claim to be would take a closer look at what they are reporting. Clearly you're not as smart as you think you are.

And this:
"U.S. Agencies See No Move by Iran to Build a Bomb" U.S. Agencies See No Move by Iran to Build a Bomb


For those who enjoy doing research, the Democrats via the Pike and the Church committees in Congress saw to it that the intelligence apparatus of the United States was emasculated.

Since then, they cannot be counted on.

A priori proof of the hatred of the Democrats/Liberals for America.

 

[PoliticalChic]

....and recognizing not to believe the Democrats, and especially the lying snake in the White House.

Here's "Rolling Stone" calling bs on Obama...


1. "Something About This Russia Story Stinks
....the American press is again asked to co-sign a dubious intelligence assessment

2. ....Obama administration announced a series of sanctions against Russia. Thirty-five Russian nationals will be expelled from the country.

3. President Obama issued a terse statement seeming to blame Russia




4. The New York Times was more aggressive, writing flatly, "Obama Strikes Back at Russia for Election Hacking." It backed up its story with a link to a joint FBI/Homeland Security report that details how Russian civilian and military intelligence services (termed "RIS" in the report) twice breached the defenses of "a U.S. political party," presumably the Democrats.

5. This dramatic story puts the news media in a jackpot. Absent independent verification, reporters will have to rely upon the secret assessments of intelligence agencies to cover the story at all....news agencies seemed split on whether to unequivocally declare that Russian hacking took place, or whether to hedge bets and put it all on the government to make that declaration, using "Obama says" formulations.


6. ...[the FBI/Homeland Security] report is long on jargon but short on specifics. More than half of it is just a list of suggestions for preventive measures.

7. ....we don't learn much at all about what led our government to determine a) that these hacks were directed by the Russian government, or b) they were undertaken with the aim of influencing the election, and in particular to help elect Donald Trump.



8. If the American security agencies had smoking-gun evidence that the Russians had an organized campaign to derail the U.S. presidential election and deliver the White House to Trump, then expelling a few dozen diplomats after the election seems like an oddly weak and ill-timed response. Voices in both parties are saying this now." Taibbi: Something About This Russia Story Stinks




But don't worry....the stupidest among us will continue to believe the malicious, incompetent, dirt-eating low-life back-stabbing crypto-Islamist snake in the White House...


....won't you, Liberals?

And 17 intelligence agencies...You need some time off lol...

But the report also said it didn't influence the election. Care to comment on that?

It said there was no proof. Of course it's obvious. Pundits said the e-mails showed Hillary screwed Bernie, sold the State Dept and the Foundation, called Hispanics needy etc etc- FOR A YEAR. All bs.

Really....I don't know how someone who posts such stupidity can find his way back to that refrigerator box he calls home, each day.

Do you have a trained gorilla who leads you????

 

[Rustic]

Matt? Mike's kid (Taibbi)? He lived in Russia for a while. Probably drank far too much rotten Vodka.


"Many reporters I know are..." Really? Many? Many that he knows?

"We all remember the WMD fiasco." "It's déjà vu all over again" is how one friend put it.
"Nothing quite adds up"

It all adds up. There were reports of Russian hacking a long time ago. Unlike the WMD fiasco, there is not a section of the intel community saying the intel is being massaged.

Why do people like you the OP want to side with the Russians? Do you hate an American President that much?

Sad. Rally Sad

There is no proof whatsoever that the Russians had any effect on the outcome of the election… fact

 

[Theowl32]

Matt? Mike's kid (Taibbi)? He lived in Russia for a while. Probably drank far too much rotten Vodka.


"Many reporters I know are..." Really? Many? Many that he knows?

"We all remember the WMD fiasco." "It's déjà vu all over again" is how one friend put it.
"Nothing quite adds up"

It all adds up. There were reports of Russian hacking a long time ago. Unlike the WMD fiasco, there is not a section of the intel community saying the intel is being massaged.

Why do people like you the OP want to side with the Russians? Do you hate an American President that much?

Sad. Rally Sad

You don't think there were reports of WMDs? Holy shit, you are all so ******* ignorant.

 

[tyroneweaver]

There is not a smidgen of proof of Russian influencing this election...

Now THAT is crazy talk



All of America's intel agencies say differently

What will you do when the goofball Donald admits it;s true?

Do you have any reasoning power? really?
You wanna believe the report if it sez there was a hack job.
But you don't wanna report that same report if it sez it didn't influence the election.

 

[PoliticalChic]

....and recognizing not to believe the Democrats, and especially the lying snake in the White House.

Here's "Rolling Stone" calling bs on Obama...


1. "Something About This Russia Story Stinks
....the American press is again asked to co-sign a dubious intelligence assessment

2. ....Obama administration announced a series of sanctions against Russia. Thirty-five Russian nationals will be expelled from the country.

3. President Obama issued a terse statement seeming to blame Russia




4. The New York Times was more aggressive, writing flatly, "Obama Strikes Back at Russia for Election Hacking." It backed up its story with a link to a joint FBI/Homeland Security report that details how Russian civilian and military intelligence services (termed "RIS" in the report) twice breached the defenses of "a U.S. political party," presumably the Democrats.

5. This dramatic story puts the news media in a jackpot. Absent independent verification, reporters will have to rely upon the secret assessments of intelligence agencies to cover the story at all....news agencies seemed split on whether to unequivocally declare that Russian hacking took place, or whether to hedge bets and put it all on the government to make that declaration, using "Obama says" formulations.


6. ...[the FBI/Homeland Security] report is long on jargon but short on specifics. More than half of it is just a list of suggestions for preventive measures.

7. ....we don't learn much at all about what led our government to determine a) that these hacks were directed by the Russian government, or b) they were undertaken with the aim of influencing the election, and in particular to help elect Donald Trump.



8. If the American security agencies had smoking-gun evidence that the Russians had an organized campaign to derail the U.S. presidential election and deliver the White House to Trump, then expelling a few dozen diplomats after the election seems like an oddly weak and ill-timed response. Voices in both parties are saying this now." Taibbi: Something About This Russia Story Stinks




But don't worry....the stupidest among us will continue to believe the malicious, incompetent, dirt-eating low-life back-stabbing crypto-Islamist snake in the White House...


....won't you, Liberals?

Indeed... indeed.

I would change a few terms used in the article though. In place of "something", may I suggest "everything".

There is no proof, just assertions which Obama is smug enough to act on... because feelings of the regressives whose hearts were broken as a result of Trump's presidency are more important to protect than to make sure that there won't be a nuclear conflict. Wikileaks already stated Russia was not its source.

They can't give away the store to prove it to the idiot GOP duh...IT'S A CONSPIRACEEEEE!!!!!!!!

It indeed is a vast conspiracy theory. That the Russians hacked the elections that is.

And produced by the same guys who consistently tell us that it's impossible to hack elections and election fraud is a myth. There is no bounds to the mental masturbation.

The Russians hacked the election, and illegal aliens didn't inflate Bill's wife's vote tally....

 

[tycho1572]

The report on Russian hacking was BS.....