Even the "Economist" prints, "Was Israel a Mistake"

[Kondor3]

And piece by piece the wall WILL come tumbling down....

 

[Kondor3]

So, Friends of Hamas, how is all this 'Divide and Conquer' strategy workin' out for ya so far?

 

[Daniyel]

The Economist can keep publish crap, all Hamas-Apologists struggle for last breath like a fish out the water.
Losing the war? nah.

 

[Kondor3]

Hamas will achieve the Ultimate Victory over the treacherous Judenvolk !!!

Clueless Arab-loving economist-twits in the UK are only one of the weapons in our propaganda arsenal !!!

 

[Indeependent]

My son received his weekly copy of The Economist today, Saturday, August 2nd.
I will now make Monty look like the stupid Jew Hater he is by presenting the article in CONTEXT.

The magazine is next to my left hand as I type the boring issue details...

The Economist August 2nd-8th 2014

Front Page Caption
Winning the battle,
losing the war

Page 5
The world this week
Politics

First Paragraph

Page 7
Leaders
Winning the battle, losing the war

Page 16
Briefing
Israel and the world
Us and them
(No specific contributor to this article)
"Was Israel all a mistake?"

So what's the problem?
I would ask Monty himself, but he's so full of shit he would make up an answer that has NOTHING to do with the ACTUAL gist of the articles.

Israel, according to this week's issue, is losing the PUBLIC RELATIONS War.
All the history and facts concerning the Israel/Gaza issue are COMPLETELY IN FAVOR OF ISRAEL.
You see, according to The Economist, the debate held in a grand Georgian library in Manchester was attended by IGNORAMUSES.
Right Monty; I mean, you DID read the ENTIRE article, did you not?

So Monty, if you love and respect The Economist so much, why do you not COMPLETELY agree with the assessment of The Economist?


ONCE AGAIN:
All the history and facts concerning the Israel/Gaza issue are COMPLETELY IN FAVOR OF ISRAEL.

Care tp point out exactly where in the article it states, "All the history and facts concerning the Israel/Gaza issue are COMPLETELY IN FAVOR OF ISRAEL." I missed it. thanks in advance.

Israel and the world: Us and them | The Economist

Israel: Winning the battle, losing the war | The Economist

2nd article, 2nd paragraph.

 

[Challenger]

The Irgun was not formed until 1931; largely in response to the formation of the Palestinian Black Hand (PBH) by Sheikh Izz ad-Din al-Qassam in the previous year.

Can you provide evidence to substantiate this claim?

Although about the Stern Gang, Jabotinsky's motivations are explored in some detail here:

The Stern Gang: Ideology, Politics, and Terror, 1940-1949 - Joseph Heller - Google Books

The PBH is not mentioned, nor does it follow that just because the PBH was formed before the Irgun, the Irgun was created because of the PBH, you risk faling into the post hoc ergo propter hoc fallacy. Given that PBH operations started 1 day after Irgun started operations, I'd be very wary of falling into the same fallacy trap.

You're forgetting that all these "gangs" were created AFTER Muslim animals committed genocide on the ancient Jews of Hebron in 1929. As usual Muslims want to kill and commit terror with no consequences.

...and you are forgetting, if you ever bothered to learn the truth in the first place, that between 300-435 Shephardic Jews were saved by your so called, "Muslim animals". The European Ashkenazi colonists bore the brunt of the mob anger, because, surprise surprise, a Zionist mob provoked the situation by marching to the Western wall in Jerusalem shouting insults and attacking muslims on the way in the previous weeks leading up to the Hebron Riot.

 

[Challenger]

My son received his weekly copy of The Economist today, Saturday, August 2nd.
I will now make Monty look like the stupid Jew Hater he is by presenting the article in CONTEXT.

The magazine is next to my left hand as I type the boring issue details...

The Economist August 2nd-8th 2014

Front Page Caption
Winning the battle,
losing the war

Page 5
The world this week
Politics

First Paragraph

Page 7
Leaders
Winning the battle, losing the war

Page 16
Briefing
Israel and the world
Us and them
(No specific contributor to this article)
"Was Israel all a mistake?"

So what's the problem?
I would ask Monty himself, but he's so full of shit he would make up an answer that has NOTHING to do with the ACTUAL gist of the articles.

Israel, according to this week's issue, is losing the PUBLIC RELATIONS War.
All the history and facts concerning the Israel/Gaza issue are COMPLETELY IN FAVOR OF ISRAEL.
You see, according to The Economist, the debate held in a grand Georgian library in Manchester was attended by IGNORAMUSES.
Right Monty; I mean, you DID read the ENTIRE article, did you not?

So Monty, if you love and respect The Economist so much, why do you not COMPLETELY agree with the assessment of The Economist?


ONCE AGAIN:
All the history and facts concerning the Israel/Gaza issue are COMPLETELY IN FAVOR OF ISRAEL.

Care tp point out exactly where in the article it states, "All the history and facts concerning the Israel/Gaza issue are COMPLETELY IN FAVOR OF ISRAEL." I missed it. thanks in advance.

Israel and the world: Us and them | The Economist

Israel: Winning the battle, losing the war | The Economist

2nd article, 2nd paragraph.

What, this?

"By contrast Israel is the most successful state in the Middle East. It is the region’s only true democracy—a hub of invention, enterprise and creativity. Israel has overwhelming firepower in the fight in Gaza. Most of its people are united behind their soldiers and have the firm backing of America’s Congress. Yet, though Israel is winning the battle, it is struggling in the war for world opinion (see article). That matters in part because Israel is a cosmopolitan trading country that looks to its American ally for security, but also because Israel needs to hear some of what its critics are saying."

 

[Indeependent]

Can you provide evidence to substantiate this claim?

Although about the Stern Gang, Jabotinsky's motivations are explored in some detail here:

The Stern Gang: Ideology, Politics, and Terror, 1940-1949 - Joseph Heller - Google Books

The PBH is not mentioned, nor does it follow that just because the PBH was formed before the Irgun, the Irgun was created because of the PBH, you risk faling into the post hoc ergo propter hoc fallacy. Given that PBH operations started 1 day after Irgun started operations, I'd be very wary of falling into the same fallacy trap.

You're forgetting that all these "gangs" were created AFTER Muslim animals committed genocide on the ancient Jews of Hebron in 1929. As usual Muslims want to kill and commit terror with no consequences.

...and you are forgetting, if you ever bothered to learn the truth in the first place, that between 300-435 Shephardic Jews were saved by your so called, "Muslim animals". The European Ashkenazi colonists bore the brunt of the mob anger, because, surprise surprise, a Zionist mob provoked the situation by marching to the Western wall in Jerusalem shouting insults and attacking muslims on the way in the previous weeks leading up to the Hebron Riot.

So what's your solution for the 2 to 3 machine gun wielding guys out of every 10 Muslims who won't drop their psychotic behavior?
You think Israelis revel in killing someone, who, if they received a education, might become the next Einstein?
Do you think we don't consider this?
It's the psychos who don't consider this.

 

[Indeependent]

Care tp point out exactly where in the article it states, "All the history and facts concerning the Israel/Gaza issue are COMPLETELY IN FAVOR OF ISRAEL." I missed it. thanks in advance.

Israel and the world: Us and them | The Economist

Israel: Winning the battle, losing the war | The Economist

2nd article, 2nd paragraph.

What, this?

"By contrast Israel is the most successful state in the Middle East. It is the region’s only true democracy—a hub of invention, enterprise and creativity. Israel has overwhelming firepower in the fight in Gaza. Most of its people are united behind their soldiers and have the firm backing of America’s Congress. Yet, though Israel is winning the battle, it is struggling in the war for world opinion (see article). That matters in part because Israel is a cosmopolitan trading country that looks to its American ally for security, but also because Israel needs to hear some of what its critics are saying."

It's called context.
The Economist details Israel's contributions to the world.
I know those compliments, listed as mere facts, don't jive well with you.

And please read what a shithole Hamas has made out of Aza.

 

[Challenger]

So to recap, you can't show us that Warsaw shot missiles at the Nazis, nor can you show us that Warsaw was ruled by a terrorist organization, nor can you disprove the love affair the Palestinians specifically the IslamoNazi Mufti had with the Nazis. You're just a fulla shit propagandist for HamASS.

Whatever meds you are taking, I think you need up up the dosage, this is just an unintelligable, meaninless rant which bears no relation to anything on this thread.

 

[Roudy]

Can you provide evidence to substantiate this claim?

Although about the Stern Gang, Jabotinsky's motivations are explored in some detail here:

The Stern Gang: Ideology, Politics, and Terror, 1940-1949 - Joseph Heller - Google Books

The PBH is not mentioned, nor does it follow that just because the PBH was formed before the Irgun, the Irgun was created because of the PBH, you risk faling into the post hoc ergo propter hoc fallacy. Given that PBH operations started 1 day after Irgun started operations, I'd be very wary of falling into the same fallacy trap.

You're forgetting that all these "gangs" were created AFTER Muslim animals committed genocide on the ancient Jews of Hebron in 1929. As usual Muslims want to kill and commit terror with no consequences.

...and you are forgetting, if you ever bothered to learn the truth in the first place, that between 300-435 Shephardic Jews were saved by your so called, "Muslim animals". The European Ashkenazi colonists bore the brunt of the mob anger, because, surprise surprise, a Zionist mob provoked the situation by marching to the Western wall in Jerusalem shouting insults and attacking muslims on the way in the previous weeks leading up to the Hebron Riot.

Bottom line is Muslims first started by killing the ancient Jews of Hebron 1929, and then Jews realized that they need to form militias to protect themselves. Yes, some Muslims helped save the Jews from the IslamoNazis, just like some Germans helped save Jews from the Nazis. And what is Hebron now, an ancient Jewish city which is the second holiest city in Judaism? Totally taken over by Muslim invaders and squatters.

 

[Roudy]

So to recap, you can't show us that Warsaw shot missiles at the Nazis, nor can you show us that Warsaw was ruled by a terrorist organization, nor can you disprove the love affair the Palestinians specifically the IslamoNazi Mufti had with the Nazis. You're just a fulla shit propagandist for HamASS.

Whatever meds you are taking, I think you need up up the dosage, this is just an unintelligable, meaninless rant which bears no relation to anything on this thread.

Ha ha ha. You're just upset that I exposed your false comparison as nothing but garbage propaganda. Get over it. The closest to the Nazis are the Hamas animals and their fellow Islamic Brotherhood Islamic terrorists all over the Middle East.

 

[Challenger]

You're forgetting that all these "gangs" were created AFTER Muslim animals committed genocide on the ancient Jews of Hebron in 1929. As usual Muslims want to kill and commit terror with no consequences.

...and you are forgetting, if you ever bothered to learn the truth in the first place, that between 300-435 Shephardic Jews were saved by your so called, "Muslim animals". The European Ashkenazi colonists bore the brunt of the mob anger, because, surprise surprise, a Zionist mob provoked the situation by marching to the Western wall in Jerusalem shouting insults and attacking muslims on the way in the previous weeks leading up to the Hebron Riot.

Bottom line is Muslims first started by killing the ancient Jews of Hebron 1929, and then Jews realized that they need to form militias to protect themselves. Yes, some Muslims helped save the Jews from the IslamoNazis, just like some Germans helped save Jews from the Nazis. And what is Hebron now, an ancient Jewish city which is the second holiest city in Judaism? Totally taken over by Muslim invaders and squatters.

Oh dear, Wrong-again-Rude-ee one day you might get it right, but not today. Jewish militias were formed and organised since 1909, look up Hashomer. The Haganah was created after the riot in Jerusalem in April 1920.

 

[Challenger]

So to recap, you can't show us that Warsaw shot missiles at the Nazis, nor can you show us that Warsaw was ruled by a terrorist organization, nor can you disprove the love affair the Palestinians specifically the IslamoNazi Mufti had with the Nazis. You're just a fulla shit propagandist for HamASS.

Whatever meds you are taking, I think you need up up the dosage, this is just an unintelligable, meaninless rant which bears no relation to anything on this thread.

Ha ha ha. You're just upset that I exposed your false comparison as nothing but garbage propaganda. Get over it. The closest to the Nazis are the Hamas animals and their fellow Islamic Brotherhood Islamic terrorists all over the Middle East.

Um, nope, nothing of substance here either; just a continuation of the previous deluded ranting, moving on.

 

[Roudy]

...and you are forgetting, if you ever bothered to learn the truth in the first place, that between 300-435 Shephardic Jews were saved by your so called, "Muslim animals". The European Ashkenazi colonists bore the brunt of the mob anger, because, surprise surprise, a Zionist mob provoked the situation by marching to the Western wall in Jerusalem shouting insults and attacking muslims on the way in the previous weeks leading up to the Hebron Riot.

Bottom line is Muslims first started by killing the ancient Jews of Hebron 1929, and then Jews realized that they need to form militias to protect themselves. Yes, some Muslims helped save the Jews from the IslamoNazis, just like some Germans helped save Jews from the Nazis. And what is Hebron now, an ancient Jewish city which is the second holiest city in Judaism? Totally taken over by Muslim invaders and squatters.

Oh dear, Wrong-again-Rude-ee one day you might get it right, but not today. Jewish militias were formed and organised since 1909, look up Hashomer. The Haganah was created after the riot in Jerusalem in April 1920.

Actually ignorant fool, the Haganah was created after Muslim animals massacred the ancient Jews of Hebron, to protect Jews from further barbarism and savagery. As usual, you're full of bullshit and garbage propaganda.

 

[Roudy]

Palestinian Arabs, the first Islamic Nazis who introduced Nazism into the Arab world.

Israel won't let them finish what the Nazis started.

Amin Al Husseini: Nazi Father of Jihad, Al Qaeda, Arafat, Saddam Hussein and the Muslim Brotherhood - Tell The Children The Truth - Homepage

 

[I.P.Freely]

You're forgetting that all these "gangs" were created AFTER Muslim animals committed genocide on the ancient Jews of Hebron in 1929. As usual Muslims want to kill and commit terror with no consequences.

...and you are forgetting, if you ever bothered to learn the truth in the first place, that between 300-435 Shephardic Jews were saved by your so called, "Muslim animals". The European Ashkenazi colonists bore the brunt of the mob anger, because, surprise surprise, a Zionist mob provoked the situation by marching to the Western wall in Jerusalem shouting insults and attacking muslims on the way in the previous weeks leading up to the Hebron Riot.

Bottom line is Muslims first started by killing the ancient Jews of Hebron 1929, and then Jews realized that they need to form militias to protect themselves. Yes, some Muslims helped save the Jews from the IslamoNazis, just like some Germans helped save Jews from the Nazis. And what is Hebron now, an ancient Jewish city which is the second holiest city in Judaism? Totally taken over by Muslim invaders and squatters.

@Roudy the Runner tell that to these Rabbis.
[ame="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gmS7rD_4mPA"]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gmS7rD_4mPA[/ame]

 

[Challenger]

Bottom line is Muslims first started by killing the ancient Jews of Hebron 1929, and then Jews realized that they need to form militias to protect themselves. Yes, some Muslims helped save the Jews from the IslamoNazis, just like some Germans helped save Jews from the Nazis. And what is Hebron now, an ancient Jewish city which is the second holiest city in Judaism? Totally taken over by Muslim invaders and squatters.

Oh dear, Wrong-again-Rude-ee one day you might get it right, but not today. Jewish militias were formed and organised since 1909, look up Hashomer. The Haganah was created after the riot in Jerusalem in April 1920.

Actually ignorant fool, the Haganah was created after Muslim animals massacred the ancient Jews of Hebron, to protect Jews from further barbarism and savagery. As usual, you're full of bullshit and garbage propaganda.

It's true, You can lead a horse (Wrong-again-Rude-ee) to water, but you can't make him drink. It's even in Wikipedia in black and white Haganah - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia but oh no, Wrong-again-Rude-ee is right and everybody else is wrong...what a tosser.

 

[Challenger]

Palestinian Arabs, the first Islamic Nazis who introduced Nazism into the Arab world.

Israel won't let them finish what the Nazis started.

Amin Al Husseini: Nazi Father of Jihad, Al Qaeda, Arafat, Saddam Hussein and the Muslim Brotherhood - Tell The Children The Truth - Homepage

Promoting your unsubstantiated hate-blog again? Isn't that against forum rules, promoting your own site?

 

[I.P.Freely]

Palestinian Arabs, the first Islamic Nazis who introduced Nazism into the Arab world.

Israel won't let them finish what the Nazis started.

Amin Al Husseini: Nazi Father of Jihad, Al Qaeda, Arafat, Saddam Hussein and the Muslim Brotherhood - Tell The Children The Truth - Homepage

Promoting your unsubstantiated hate-blog again? Isn't that against forum rules, promoting your own site?[/QUOTE [MENTION=49704]Challenger[/MENTION] dont report @Roudy the Runner I like having the lickspittle around and anyway Brits like us are inherently more dignified than a cowardly zionist grass.