Even fox news legal experts admits trump unfit for office after jan 6 th legal exposer.

Therefore they can't impose any charges against Trump since it was illegally conducted.
Why is this so hard for you?

The Hearings are not a trial.
The committee members will NOT impose charges against trump
The DOJ will.

The DOJ is not the J6 Hearing committee.
 
Thank you,
Yes, Obstruction of Justice is a Crime, Yes it is.

Now, after the indictment, trump and his ultra con men lawyers can defend the charge of, Obstruction of Justice.

You say he didn't, the DOJ will say he did.

Put trump on the stand under oath and he WILL have his Colonel Jessop moment.

He doesn't have to take the stand or oath. The fact of the matter is this is an illegal hearing. Don't you think the commies know this? Of course they do. The Supreme Court would overturn any phony conviction against him by the DOJ unless they conduct their own investigation. And if they did, they would have to conduct an investigation legally which would include Trump's choice of defense attorney.

Why won't they do that? Because Trump's attorneys would call Piglosi, the Capital police chief, the FBI director all to the stand, and they sure as hell don't want that. Lying to the congress is one thing. Lying in a court of law is quite another.

So this is all a dog and pony show. I hate for you to lose sleep tonight, but nothing is going to come of this. Why do you think they hired a entertainment executive to conduct this clown show?
 
He doesn't have to take the stand or oath. The fact of the matter is this is an illegal hearing. Don't you think the commies know this? Of course they do. The Supreme Court would overturn any phony conviction against him by the DOJ unless they conduct their own investigation. And if they did, they would have to conduct an investigation legally which would include Trump's choice of defense attorney.

Why won't they do that? Because Trump's attorneys would call Piglosi, the Capital police chief, the FBI director all to the stand, and they sure as hell don't want that. Lying to the congress is one thing. Lying in a court of law is quite another.

So this is all a dog and pony show. I hate for you to lose sleep tonight, but nothing is going to come of this. Why do you think they hired a entertainment executive to conduct this clown show?
I am starting to wonder if poor democrats will ever get over their terror of trump...he is just a man, relax...besides poor old broke down biden will save us from everything
 
There must be a lot of ketchup on the walls of Mar-A-Loco tonight!
And Steak.
That what the retard put on his well-done steak.........Ketchup.
Just like everything else Trump touches..................he ruins it.
 
The AP reported that the Republicans gained over 1 million new voters in the past year alone. We have 2.5 more years of Dementia. They are losing the Hispanic vote by the droves. And they think a phony indictment is going to help them? Talk about cutting off your nose to spite your face. If they even try anything like that, they are going to see a historic slaughter; worse than the one coming in November.
Assuming we're not under Martial Law for the midterms because Beandon starts WWIII
 
He doesn't have to take the stand or oath. The fact of the matter is this is an illegal hearing. Don't you think the commies know this? Of course they do. The Supreme Court would overturn any phony conviction against him by the DOJ unless they conduct their own investigation. And if they did, they would have to conduct an investigation legally which would include Trump's choice of defense attorney.

Why won't they do that? Because Trump's attorneys would call Piglosi, the Capital police chief, the FBI director all to the stand, and they sure as hell don't want that. Lying to the congress is one thing. Lying in a court of law is quite another.

So this is all a dog and pony show. I hate for you to lose sleep tonight, but nothing is going to come of this. Why do you think they hired a entertainment executive to conduct this clown show?
What reasons would Trump in a criminal defence have to call Pelosi?

How would that help his legal defence?

Before the Prosecution has time to object the Judge will have the defence lawyers explain relevance...

Could you please tell us how putting Pelosi on the stand is relevant if he was charged with the crime of insurrection...
 
What reasons would Trump in a criminal defence have to call Pelosi?

How would that help his legal defence?

Before the Prosecution has time to object the Judge will have the defence lawyers explain relevance...

Could you please tell us how putting Pelosi on the stand is relevant if he was charged with the crime of insurrection...
Oh, I say do it, you spineless trash.
 
He doesn't have to take the stand or oath. The fact of the matter is this is an illegal hearing. Don't you think the commies know this? Of course they do. The Supreme Court would overturn any phony conviction against him by the DOJ unless they conduct their own investigation. And if they did, they would have to conduct an investigation legally which would include Trump's choice of defense attorney.

Why won't they do that? Because Trump's attorneys would call Piglosi, the Capital police chief, the FBI director all to the stand, and they sure as hell don't want that. Lying to the congress is one thing. Lying in a court of law is quite another.

So this is all a dog and pony show. I hate for you to lose sleep tonight, but nothing is going to come of this. Why do you think they hired a entertainment executive to conduct this clown show?
Gosh ray, you are so wrong about so many things, in this post.

1) the Select committee is not illegal, nor their hearings. According to House rules, for over 100 years, the speaker of the House has final authority on all members picked for a Select Committee.

This committee is an official and legal House Select committee, under the law.

2). This is not a trial, nor a DOJ investigation. No one in this committee can charge anyone with anything.

3) The DOJ keeps their investigations secret, and brings their collected evidence before a grand jury, which is done in secrecy. The grand jury can ask for even more evidence with subpoena requests and witness testimony, and makes a decision on whether it is likely, a crime was committed, and charges brought.

All of this is done without the accused defense lawyer's involvement, or knowing....there is no due process for the perpetrator at this point.....

Only when a person is charged is due process needed or required under the law and constitution, not during investigations the DOJ may do.

4) There is no process in our legal system where the DOJ can bring charges without cause....without a law the perp allegedly and likely broke.

And even if the DOJ believes it has proof the perp committed crimes, they may choose not to charge the perp, like a President.....
 
What reasons would Trump in a criminal defence have to call Pelosi?

How would that help his legal defence?

Before the Prosecution has time to object the Judge will have the defence lawyers explain relevance...

Could you please tell us how putting Pelosi on the stand is relevant if he was charged with the crime of insurrection...


It would all hinge on what kind of phony charges they would try to bring against him. Let's face it, this is nothing more than trying to knock Trump out of the 24 race and discredit the reps he supported for 22; a clown show. In all the years I've followed politics, I've never seen the Communists so scared of one man in my life.
 

New Topics

Forum List

Back
Top