Europeans under the bus

edward37

Gold Member
Jan 19, 2017
25,452
2,271
290
They were very concerned that the T said nothing about continuing to support the NATO article 5, the one for all and all for one agreement. The article that every European country followed after 9/11 and supported the US in the was against Al Qaeda, and the reason they all sent soldiers to Afghanistan, in support their ally, who was attacked, the USA. They were all unhappy that Trump had not stated his continued support for every European country, if they might be attacked by ISIS - or Russia -, as they all had support the US. They want to be able to trust the US, as we trusted them!

Course the T seems willing to throw his best friends under the bus, if that would make him richer, and the Europeans seem to have noticed! tic tic tic it's almost over republicans ,,,,soon you'll be a shitstain on history
 
we should always fight wars as the USA and only accept help if they are willing be be under USA command as , maybe Butlers Edward !!
 
Last edited:
we should always fight wars as the USA and only accept help if they are willing be be under USA command as , maybe Butlers Elmer !!
republicans throwing friends under the bus ,stabbing them in the back ?? Nothing new Espionage now ? What excuses do you have now? Our top SPY chasers are after your slime
 
He didn't repudiate Article 5, and the U.S. is bound by it. We were not obliged to bail Europe out in the two world wars, yet we did. Better if Trump had said it, certainly, but I wouldn't read too much into his omission.
 
we should always fight wars as the USA and only accept help if they are willing be be under USA command as , maybe Butlers Elmer !!
republicans throwing friends under the bus ,stabbing them in the back ?? Nothing new Espionage now ? What excuses do you have now? Our top SPY chasers are after your slime

Another mindless third grader using potty talk as a substitute for intelligent conversation.
 
we should always fight wars as the USA and only accept help if they are willing be be under USA command as , maybe Butlers Edward !!
I rather think at this point the sentence could be shortened to:

we should always be fighting wars.
 
He didn't repudiate Article 5, and the U.S. is bound by it. We were not obliged to bail Europe out in the two world wars, yet we did. Better if Trump had said it, certainly, but I wouldn't read too much into his omission.
I agree, nothing Don says means anything at all.
 
we should always fight wars as the USA and only accept help if they are willing be be under USA command as , maybe Butlers Elmer !!
republicans throwing friends under the bus ,stabbing them in the back ?? Nothing new Espionage now ? What excuses do you have now? Our top SPY chasers are after your slime

Another mindless third grader using potty talk as a substitute for intelligent conversation.
Have the Russians penetrated our WH ? WHEN will Republicans ,so called patriots < say ENOUGH >
 
He didn't repudiate Article 5, and the U.S. is bound by it. We were not obliged to bail Europe out in the two world wars, yet we did. Better if Trump had said it, certainly, but I wouldn't read too much into his omission.
------------------------------------------------------------------- the way i see things is that its better to make the 'euros' wonder and keep them on the edge of their seats DGS !!
 
They were very concerned that the T said nothing about continuing to support the NATO article 5, the one for all and all for one agreement. The article that every European country followed after 9/11 and supported the US in the was against Al Qaeda, and the reason they all sent soldiers to Afghanistan, in support their ally, who was attacked, the USA. They were all unhappy that Trump had not stated his continued support for every European country, if they might be attacked by ISIS - or Russia -, as they all had support the US. They want to be able to trust the US, as we trusted them!

Course the T seems willing to throw his best friends under the bus, if that would make him richer, and the Europeans seem to have noticed! tic tic tic it's almost over republicans ,,,,soon you'll be a shitstain on history
Actually they did not all support the US in Iraq. Germany for one refused to. They 'supported' us by taking over some positions in bases in Germany to free up more US soldiers to go to Iraq.

That is rather irrelevant anyway because Trump did not back away from article 5 - he does not need to re-state that we will follow commitments that we have already made. That is an asinine expectation.
 
They were very concerned that the T said nothing about continuing to support the NATO article 5, the one for all and all for one agreement. The article that every European country followed after 9/11 and supported the US in the was against Al Qaeda, and the reason they all sent soldiers to Afghanistan, in support their ally, who was attacked, the USA. They were all unhappy that Trump had not stated his continued support for every European country, if they might be attacked by ISIS - or Russia -, as they all had support the US. They want to be able to trust the US, as we trusted them!

Course the T seems willing to throw his best friends under the bus, if that would make him richer, and the Europeans seem to have noticed! tic tic tic it's almost over republicans ,,,,soon you'll be a shitstain on history
You sound like TruthDoestMatter. A perfect idol for you to emulate I suppose.
 
They were very concerned that the T said nothing about continuing to support the NATO article 5, the one for all and all for one agreement. The article that every European country followed after 9/11 and supported the US in the was against Al Qaeda, and the reason they all sent soldiers to Afghanistan, in support their ally, who was attacked, the USA. They were all unhappy that Trump had not stated his continued support for every European country, if they might be attacked by ISIS - or Russia -, as they all had support the US. They want to be able to trust the US, as we trusted them!

Course the T seems willing to throw his best friends under the bus, if that would make him richer, and the Europeans seem to have noticed! tic tic tic it's almost over republicans ,,,,soon you'll be a shitstain on history
Actually they did not all support the US in Iraq. Germany for one refused to. They 'supported' us by taking over some positions in bases in Germany to free up more US soldiers to go to Iraq.

That is rather irrelevant anyway because Trump did not back away from article 5 - he does not need to re-state that we will follow commitments that we have already made. That is an asinine expectation.
Not all supported us in Iraq because they wouldn't buy the bush republican bullshit WOMD??
 
They were very concerned that the T said nothing about continuing to support the NATO article 5, the one for all and all for one agreement. The article that every European country followed after 9/11 and supported the US in the was against Al Qaeda, and the reason they all sent soldiers to Afghanistan, in support their ally, who was attacked, the USA. They were all unhappy that Trump had not stated his continued support for every European country, if they might be attacked by ISIS - or Russia -, as they all had support the US. They want to be able to trust the US, as we trusted them!

Course the T seems willing to throw his best friends under the bus, if that would make him richer, and the Europeans seem to have noticed! tic tic tic it's almost over republicans ,,,,soon you'll be a shitstain on history
You sound like TruthDoestMatter. A perfect idol for you to emulate I suppose.
And with all what's going on now 3 trump people forgetting they talked to russian ambassador,, Kushner considering setting up secret line to Kremlin etc etc you vote for keeping your blinders on ? WHEN will republicans start thinking of country first instead of party?
 
Get rid of NATO. It has no purpose, but to start wars.

Yes, the US doesn't need NATO to start wars. You can do it all yourself.

I remember how angry Americans were that France refused to join the invasion of Iraq. Freedom fries anyone?
Possible we didn't pay them enough?? We did to Poland They weighed in with 3, or400 men
 
Wonderful! I wish to fuck over the Coward Continent in any way we can! European slime of my race have ALWAYS hated Americans and always will, regardless of what we do. While using this country for every convenience/advantage they can while pimping their OWN DAUGHTERS out to Pisslam pedophiles. Europeans are a vile bag of garbage who should NOT be emulated in any way - everything about their treasonous, self-loathing natures should repel any male with a set of balls. This "bloody yank" wants European walking diseases to PAY for their treason against the Western world; they need another bubonic plague. Yes, I really do detest that subhuman continent FAR more than their muslim animals. No two groups of black-hearted, completely amoral, arrogant human excrement deserve each other more than Zeropeans and muslim pond-life, it's a match made in heaven.
 
They were very concerned that the T said nothing about continuing to support the NATO article 5, the one for all and all for one agreement. The article that every European country followed after 9/11 and supported the US in the was against Al Qaeda, and the reason they all sent soldiers to Afghanistan, in support their ally, who was attacked, the USA. They were all unhappy that Trump had not stated his continued support for every European country, if they might be attacked by ISIS - or Russia -, as they all had support the US. They want to be able to trust the US, as we trusted them!

Course the T seems willing to throw his best friends under the bus, if that would make him richer, and the Europeans seem to have noticed! tic tic tic it's almost over republicans ,,,,soon you'll be a shitstain on history

They must expel Turkey.
 

Forum List

Back
Top