Equal Protection Of Citizenship Is In A State Of Sedition Because Of Supreme Court Ruling On Abortion

[Toddsterpatriot]

" Removing All Doubt Of Vacuous Retort "

* Frivolous Games Of Trolls *

The decision is sedition against equal protection that is based in citizenship .

The decision "rebels" against equal protection?

What does that even mean?

 

[Monk-Eye]

" High Crimes "

* Usurping The Law Through Force Of Unauthorized Dictum *

The decision "rebels" against equal protection?

What does that even mean?

The authority by law of the United States that requires birth for equal protection is being prevented by force through an unconstitutional ruling from the court .

18 U.S. Code § 2384 - Seditious conspiracy

www.law.cornell.edu

If two or more persons in any State or Territory, or in any place subject to the jurisdiction of the United States, conspire to overthrow, put down, or to destroy by force the Government of the United States, or to levy war against them, or to oppose by force the authority thereof, or by force to prevent, hinder, or delay the execution of any law of the United States, or by force to seize, take, or possess any property of the United States contrary to the authority thereof, they shall each be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than twenty years, or both.

 

[Toddsterpatriot]

" High Crimes "

* Usurping The Law Through Force Of Unauthorized Dictum *

The authority by law of the United States that requires birth for equal protection is being prevented by force through an unconstitutional ruling from the court .

18 U.S. Code § 2384 - Seditious conspiracy

www.law.cornell.edu

If two or more persons in any State or Territory, or in any place subject to the jurisdiction of the United States, conspire to overthrow, put down, or to destroy by force the Government of the United States, or to levy war against them, or to oppose by force the authority thereof, or by force to prevent, hinder, or delay the execution of any law of the United States, or by force to seize, take, or possess any property of the United States contrary to the authority thereof, they shall each be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than twenty years, or both.

You're still not making sense.

How is equal protection being prevented?

Who is preventing the execution of a law? Which law? Where?

 

[Monk-Eye]

" Illegitimate Authority "

* Enemies Foreign And Domestic *

You're still not making sense.

How is equal protection being prevented?

Who is preventing the execution of a law? Which law? Where?

The authority of law being prevented from execution is for that of us constitution for equal protection with a citizen .

States are issuing force against the authority of law in us constitution for equal protection with a citizen that was conspired by members of the us supreme court .

 

[Toddsterpatriot]

" Illegitimate Authority "

* Enemies Foreign And Domestic *

The authority of law being prevented from execution is for that of us constitution for equal protection with a citizen .

States are issuing force against the authority of law in us constitution for equal protection with a citizen that was conspired by members of the us supreme court .

I know. It's awful!

How is equal protection being prevented?

Who is preventing the execution of a law? Which law? Where?

 

[Monk-Eye]

" Round And Round "

* Logically Of Course *

I know. It's awful!

How is equal protection being prevented?

Who is preventing the execution of a law? Which law? Where?

Contraposition - Wikipedia

en.wikipedia.org

If P then Q -> ~Q then ~P

If equal protection requires birth -> without birth there is not equal protection .

A fetus is receiving greater protections than that of a citizen , because a citizen has met the requirement for equal protection by having been born .

It continues to be levied that there is not an entitlement to abortion in us constitution , yet there is also not a prohibition in us constitution preventing abortion .

State actions blocking abortion provide unequal protection to a fetus and us supreme court conspired to prevent the implementation of us constitution and codified law by its ruling which is by letter of law an act of sedition .

 

[Toddsterpatriot]

" Round And Round "

* Logically Of Course *

Contraposition - Wikipedia

en.wikipedia.org

If P then Q -> ~Q then ~P

If equal protection requires birth -> without birth there is not equal protection .

A fetus is receiving greater protections than that of a citizen , because a citizen has met the requirement for equal protection by having been born .

It continues to be levied that there is not an entitlement to abortion in us constitution , yet there is also not a prohibition in us constitution preventing abortion .

State actions blocking abortion provide unequal protection to a fetus and us supreme court conspired to prevent the implementation of us constitution and codified law by its ruling which is by letter of law an act of sedition .

A fetus is receiving greater protections than that of a citizen ,

How?

It continues to be levied that there is not an entitlement to abortion in us constitution

Is there an entitlement in the Constitution? Post it.

yet there is also not a prohibition in us constitution preventing abortion .

You're right.

us supreme court conspired to prevent the implementation of us constitution

Sounds awful! Which part?

its ruling which is by letter of law an act of sedition .

conduct or speech inciting people to rebel against the authority of a state or monarch.

How did the ruling incite rebellion?

 

[Monk-Eye]

" Preferential Treatment "

* Protected Where Protections Are Not Entitled Is Unequal Protection *

A fetus is receiving greater protections than that of a citizen ,

How?

A citizen is being prevented from taking an action that if equal protection were applied it would be allowed to perform .

* Stipulating Privileges Against Whimsical Dictates *

It continues to be levied that there is not an entitlement to abortion in us constitution

Is there an entitlement in the Constitution? Post it.

US non enumerated wrights of us 9th amendment mean the entitlement is granted , by virtue of a legitimate state interest not existing to prevent it .

The enumeration in the Constitution, of certain rights, shall not be construed to deny or disparage others retained by the people.[3]


* State Interest Limited To Birth For Equal Protection *

yet there is also not a prohibition in us constitution preventing abortion .

You're right.

The terms right and left are directions , the accurate descriptor is the term correct .


* Birth Requirement For Authorization Ignored *

us supreme court conspired to prevent the implementation of us constitution

Sounds awful! Which part?

Amendment XIV​

Section 1.​

All persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the state wherein they reside. No state shall make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the United States; nor shall any state deprive any person of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws.

1 U.S. Code § 8 - “Person”, “human being”, “child”, and “individual” as including born-alive infant

www.law.cornell.edu

, the words “person”, “human being”, “child”, and “individual”, shall include every infant member of the species homo sapiens who is born alive at any stage of development.

Modus tollens - Wikipedia

en.wikipedia.org

If P, then Q.Not Q.Therefore, not P.
If one has been born , then equal protection is provided . Where equal protection is not provided , one has not been born .

* Conditional Or *

its ruling which is by letter of law an act of sedition .

conduct or speech inciting people to rebel against the authority of a state or monarch.

How did the ruling incite rebellion?

or to oppose by force the authority thereof, or by force to prevent, hinder, or delay the execution of any law of the United States,

 

[Toddsterpatriot]

" Preferential Treatment "

* Protected Where Protections Are Not Entitled Is Unequal Protection *

A citizen is being prevented from taking an action that if equal protection were applied it would be allowed to perform .

* Stipulating Privileges Against Whimsical Dictates *


US non enumerated wrights of us 9th amendment mean the entitlement is granted , by virtue of a legitimate state interest not existing to prevent it .

The enumeration in the Constitution, of certain rights, shall not be construed to deny or disparage others retained by the people.[3]


* State Interest Limited To Birth For Equal Protection *

The terms right and left are directions , the accurate descriptor is the term correct .


* Birth Requirement For Authorization Ignored *

Amendment XIV​

Section 1.​

All persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the state wherein they reside. No state shall make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the United States; nor shall any state deprive any person of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws.

1 U.S. Code § 8 - “Person”, “human being”, “child”, and “individual” as including born-alive infant

www.law.cornell.edu

, the words “person”, “human being”, “child”, and “individual”, shall include every infant member of the species homo sapiens who is born alive at any stage of development.

Modus tollens - Wikipedia

en.wikipedia.org

If P, then Q.Not Q.Therefore, not P.
If one has been born , then equal protection is provided . Where equal protection is not provided , one has not been born .

* Conditional Or *

or to oppose by force the authority thereof, or by force to prevent, hinder, or delay the execution of any law of the United States,

A citizen is being prevented from taking an action that if equal protection were applied it would be allowed to perform .

Which action involving "equal protection"?

US non enumerated wrights of us 9th amendment mean the entitlement is granted

Granted where?

The enumeration in the Constitution, of certain rights, shall not be construed to deny or disparage others retained by the people.

Retained by the people? Not the federal government?

The terms right and left are directions , the accurate descriptor is the term correct .

or to oppose by force the authority thereof, or by force to prevent, hinder, or delay the execution of any law of the United States,

Their ruling opposed by force? Which law of the United States?

 

[Monk-Eye]

" Piss Poor Pretenses That Slang Is A Substitute For Rigorous Terminology "

* Vernacular To Ensure The Public Has Shit For Brains *

A citizen is being prevented from taking an action that if equal protection were applied it would be allowed to perform .

Which action involving "equal protection"?

US non enumerated wrights of us 9th amendment mean the entitlement is granted

Granted where?

The enumeration in the Constitution, of certain rights, shall not be construed to deny or disparage others retained by the people.

Retained by the people? Not the federal government?

The terms right and left are directions , the accurate descriptor is the term correct .



View attachment 666078

or to oppose by force the authority thereof, or by force to prevent, hinder, or delay the execution of any law of the United States,

Their ruling opposed by force? Which law of the United States?

So if it is necessary to take a left turn to get to destination , to do so would be right , or would that be correct ?

Of course to turn left would not be right as it would be left , and any suggestion that to go left is right is contradictory nonsense , and so follows the rest of the circle jerk game and numb skull application of incompetent terminology and failed logical deduction about the court ruling .

SCROTUS usurped us constitution and directed an authority of force to states to protect a wright to life of a fetus where neither interest by a state , nor letter or law , nor wright to life of a fetus exists and it surmounts to sedition .

 

[Toddsterpatriot]

" Piss Poor Pretenses That Slang Is A Substitute For Rigorous Terminology "

* Vernacular To Ensure The Public Has Shit For Brains *

So if it is necessary to take a left turn to get to destination , to do so would be right , or would that be correct ?

Of course to turn left would not be right as it would be left , and any suggestion that to go left is right is contradictory nonsense , and so follows the rest of the circle jerk game and numb skull application of incompetent terminology and failed logical deduction about the court ruling .

SCROTUS usurped us constitution and directed an authority of force to states to protect a wright to life of a fetus where neither interest by a state , nor letter or law , nor wright to life of a fetus exists and it surmounts to sedition .

Still no answers. That's disappointing.

 

[Monk-Eye]

" Tyranny By Majority Of Religious Reich Traitors For SCOTUS Sedition Violating Us 1st Establishment Clause And Us 9th Protection Of Negative Liberty Clause And Us 14th Birth Requirement For Equal Protection Clause "

* Us 9th Specific Limits To Us 10 State Interests *

Still no answers. That's disappointing.

US 9th assures that state interests are not issued based on whimsy , rather states interests are based on protection of negative liberties , bound by the limits of safety and security , with a presumption that negative liberties of one individual - entitled to equal protection - do not deprive another individual - entitled to equal protection - of its negative liberties .

Logically , of course , a legitimate state interest does not exist in protecting a wright to life of zef ( zygote , embryo , fetus ) which has not me a birth requirement for equal protection with a citizen .

A state is only concerned with whether a wright to life exists , and not whether a life exists ,

Consider capital punishment as an example whereby a wright to life is removed , albeit by dure process , as double entendre and necessary contingency that an individual unlawfully removed a wright to life of another individual , whereby in so doing removed its own wright to life .


* Useful Tenets *

Negative liberties are protections , independence and individualism .

Positive liberties are endowments , dependence and collectivism .

Democracy for populism against individualism is tyranny by majority !

Republicanism seeks individualism through protection of negative liberties .


* Crux Against State Despotism And A Primary Constitutional Term Shortcoming *

The declaration of independence has not been modified and is embraced as foundation for whatever is the so called conservative movement .

By declaration of independence , " all men are created equal " which surreptitiously presumes that women are not equal , else see us 19th .

The literal etymology of " per son " means male and countable by census , such that by letter of law from US 14th , where any person may be a citizen , women are not citizens .

The credo of e pluribus unum guides that us republic is established to protect negative liberties for independence and individualism .

An intent in declaration of independence is to relate that potentate authority does not supersede a more valid perspective of altruism to protect negative liberties of the individual .

BTW the conservative versus liberal paradigm is intellectual buffoonery and political science idiocy that leads to public mental retardation - https://usmessageboard.com/threads/political-science-terminology-negative-positive-wrights-liberties-protections-endowments.707820/ .

 

[Osiris-ODS]

" Letter Of The Law Broken By Leap And Then Look Legal Incompetence "

* Sedition By Constitutionally Unauthorized Authorization For State Interests *

The clause for equal protection with a citizen ( citizenship ) in us 14th amendment is being violated .

Us supreme court has issued an order authorizing state interests in violation of us constitution , by authorizing a state to provide equal protection to a fetus , which is not entitled to equal protection with a citizen , because the fetus has not met the requirement of birth .

What county do you live in? It's obvious that you are not very comfortable with the English language, so it's unsurprising that your grasp of U.S. law is equally uninformed. I honestly have no idea what you're even trying to say here, this reads like unintelligible gobedlygook. Whatever point you thought you were making, you failed to make it. I would suggest getting a better translation app.

 

[Monk-Eye]

" SCOTUS Committed Sedition "

* Incompetent Critics *

What county do you live in? It's obvious that you are not very comfortable with the English language, so it's unsurprising that your grasp of U.S. law is equally uninformed. I honestly have no idea what you're even trying to say here, this reads like unintelligible gobedlygook. Whatever point you thought you were making, you failed to make it. I would suggest getting a better translation app.

By us 14th amendment , birth is required to become a citizen and by logical induction , by logically of course deduction , birth is required for equal protection and a wright to life .

My literacy and competence of the english language are not in question , thanks for the thread bump .

 

[Papageorgio]

" Irrelevant Except For Quibbling About The Irrelevant "

* Sanctimonious Theistic Establishment Of Religion Crap *


The only thing which matters is whether a constitutional wright to life exists and neither a fetus nor an individual sentenced to death by capital punishment has one .

Hard to take anyone seriously when they can’t even spell the word ”right”.

 

[Monk-Eye]

" Turned Left To Get Home Then Says They Turned Right "

* Grinning At The Ignorant *

Hard to take anyone seriously when they can’t even spell the word ”right”.

The term wright is correct and it is based in legal positivism .

It is difficult for me to take the political science neophyte seriously .

 

[Toddsterpatriot]

Hard to take anyone seriously when they can’t even spell the word ”right”.

It's a weird one.

 

[Papageorgio]

" Turned Left To Get Home Then Says They Turned Right "

* Grinning At The Ignorant *

The term wright is correct and it is based in legal positivism .

It is difficult for me to take the political science neophyte seriously .

Thanks for the laughs, I appreciate it. Not to worry, I would never take a person like yourself seriously, it seems you are full of yourself.

 

[Monk-Eye]

" Pathetic Public "

* Public Nose Ring Inserted By Idiots In Charge *

Thanks for the laughs, I appreciate it.

Obviously Blackmun's " Logically , of course , a legitimate state interest . . " is beyond you to discuss .

But , hey , no need to feel too bad about it , the SCOTUS of sedition , the entire legal community of dullards , the pro-choice leadership of greedy half wits and organized crime fee press have proven themselves to be disingenuous degenerates worthy of ridicule for forsaking us public of informed consent .

 

[Papageorgio]

G

" Pathetic Public "

* Public Nose Ring Inserted By Idiots In Charge *

Obviously Blackmun's " Logically , of course , a legitimate state interest . . " is beyond you to discuss .

But , hey , no need to feel too bad about it , the SCOTUS of sedition , the entire legal community of dullards , the pro-choice leadership of greedy half wits and organized crime fee press have proven themselves to be disingenuous degenerates worthy of ridicule for forsaking us public of informed consent .

I bet you are a 1%er as well, you can’t pretend to be as smart as you are and hurl insults if you aren’t a 1%er. The insulting you do is just a sign of your insecurity and your lack of smarts, we pretty much can see that.

Congress needs to right the wrong of 50 years ago and make a law as it stands the ruling is solid and is law, Congress needs to get off their asses and do something.