Epstein's accountant is now the FIFTH witness to tell the Committee that President Trump was NOT involved.

Lol. Pedo Donny ain't a Democrat. R or D has nothing to do with it. There are POS on both sides of that isle. Just as long as rapists and killers get what they got coming don't care what their affiliations are.
Yet the only one you want to get is Trump, with no real evidence and lots of testimony to the contrary.

Besides those 5, the guiltiest, by far, are all democrats, with Bubba Bill leading the pack.
 
Right, so Joe Boxarocks has no idea whether trump did any of the things people accuse him, off that's my point nobody can say he didn't do X, they only say that because they irrationally trust him, infatuated with him and he is about the least trustworthy person alive.
Goes both directions. No proof either way.

You going to change your avatar to a squirrel 🐿️?
 
You're FOS.
Biden's DOJ had Facebook take down homemade cures for COVID from RWNJ's.
Now we have a RWNJ, ex heroin addict with a brain worm running the FDA.
Bullshit. Why did Garland prevent the FBI agent involved Elvis Chan, from testifying?
 
Raskin was lying.

To prove it, release the Trump files.
What TRUMP! files? If you're talking about the Epstein files that some are so adamantly convinced prove TRUMP! is guilty of something, yes please release them. If the rich and famous are abusing kids, we should know and I simply don't care if it lands Bubba Clinton in a cell next to Bill Gates.
 



This has to be a disappointment to Democrats. Bill Clinton caught half naked in hot tub in an Epstein files photo and
now this.

So all of these "witnesses" traveled around with Epstein 100% of the time day and night? But I don't think most of Trump's ex-supporters actually think he diddled kids. We're a bit more upset that he let the ones who did walk with pure impunity. That makes him an accessory after the fact.
 
The more Trump and his cult deflect and hide, the more guilty the orange child molester looks.
You clowns are deflecting when the more coming out is embarrassing democrats.

Besides those 5, the guiltiest, by far, are all democrats, with Bubba Bill leading the pack.
"Bill Clinton likes them young"
 
Right, so Joe Boxarocks has no idea whether trump did any of the things people accuse him, off that's my point nobody can say he didn't do X, they only say that because they irrationally trust him, infatuated with him and he is about the least trustworthy person alive.
Minus credible evidence that he actually did something, we have to assume he didn't do anything, that's the way it works. It's not enough to convict him of something because reasons and Orange Man Bad.

Naturally, I expect that no matter HOW many people involved stand up and say, "No, I never saw TRUMP! do anything wrong, never saw him visit the island, never saw him abuse anyone", the usual suspects will totally ignore them and glom onto something somebody heard somebody else say they once heard somebody say TRUMP! thought about going to the island.
 
Minus credible evidence that he actually did something, we have to assume he didn't do anything, that's the way it works.
No "we" don't have to assume anything. We can instead use inference and form an opinion based on reason, known facts about his character, prior examples of denials that were proven to be false and so on.

Trump did lose a trial to a jury where he denied sexual abuse, that's a fact.
It's not enough to convict him of something because reasons and Orange Man Bad.
I'm not "convicting" him, this is a discussion forum not a court.
Naturally, I expect that no matter HOW many people involved stand up and say, "No, I never saw TRUMP! do anything wrong, never saw him visit the island, never saw him abuse anyone", the usual suspects will totally ignore them and glom onto something somebody heard somebody else say they once heard somebody say TRUMP! thought about going to the island.
It doesn't matter, the fact that someone didn't see him do X is meaningless because if trump did not want anyone to see then they wouldn't have seen it.

Why attach significance to people saying he didn't do X yet repeatedly disparage those who say he did do X?

Sexual abusers almost always abuse in private settings with no prospects of witnesses.
 
You clowns are deflecting when the more coming out is embarrassing democrats.


"Bill Clinton likes them young"
1773412800743.webp
 
15th post
No "we" don't have to assume anything. We can instead use inference and form an opinion based on reason, known facts about his character, prior examples of denials that were proven to be false and so on.
Be sure to let us know when someone can prove he was actually on the island.
I'm not "convicting" him, this is a discussion forum not a court.
I'm using the word convict in a general sense. Are you not completely convinced he is guilty of child molestation, or do you acknowledge that not only is there doubt, there is no solid evidence of him doing so?
It doesn't matter, the fact that someone didn't see him do X is meaningless because if trump did not want anyone to see then they wouldn't have seen it.

Sexual abusers almost always abuse in private settings with no prospects of witnesses.
The island was a private setting. Had he landed and gotten off the plane, he would have been observed. No one has stated that they ever saw him land and get off the plane.
 
Be sure to let us know when someone can prove he was actually on the island.

I'm using the word convict in a general sense. Are you not completely convinced he is guilty of child molestation, or do you acknowledge that not only is there doubt, there is no solid evidence of him doing so?

The island was a private setting. Had he landed and gotten off the plane, he would have been observed. No one has stated that they ever saw him land and get off the plane.
I made no reference to any island, look at the thread's title:

Epstein's accountant is now the FIFTH witness to tell the Committee that President Trump was NOT involved.

I question the relevance of that, a person who was an accountant for a child abuser saying trump was not involved, hardly makes a strong case nor can he say for sure whether trump was or was not "involved" in anything.

You desperate trump idolizers will post any old claptrap to try and paint the man as a saint, it's embarrassing to watch.
 

New Topics

Back
Top Bottom