End The First Amendment???

[JakeStarkey]

Yeah, right. M. D., you certainly are not a classical liberal. Ans since you redefine as you continue, you can claim to be Bugs Bunny.

 

[M.D. Rawlings]

Yeah, right. M. D., you certainly are not a classical liberal. Ans since you redefine as you continue, you can claim to be Bugs Bunny.

LOL! A libertarian, like the American conservative, is a person who embraces the classical liberalism of the Anglo-American tradition, ya damn fool!

 

[M.D. Rawlings]

This is no more outrageous than conservatives advocating for the denial of equal protection rights for same-sex couples or privacy rights concerning procreation.

Why aren’t you denouncing those efforts equally offensive to the Constitution?

"[N]o more outrageous"? Note, once again, that C_Clayton-Jones-Ahmadinejad unwittingly acknowledges the truth about something he tried to deny, in this instance about the designs of so many in the Muslim community, hear and abroad.

Don't forget what he wrote before when he unwittingly revealed the content of his shriveled heart . . . in the face of Muslim barbarians raging and killing and destroying in the streets of the Islamic world:

And that the hate and ignorance exhibited by the right concerning Islam be shouted down in the free marketplace of political ideas [The free marketplace of political ideas shouted down by Muslims!] is the consequence of the right's failure to make their case, they have only themselves to blame, not ‘liberals’, not the government, and not Muslims. ——Statist Bootlick C_Clayton_Jones-Ahmadinejad​

No. Why aren't you, C_Clayton-Jones-Ahmadinejad, denouncing yourself as you lie and defame; that is to say, why aren't you telling the whole truth as you equate, being the moral and intellectual degenerate that you are, the defense of fundamental rights and the sanctity of human life with Islamic oppression?

C_Clayton-Jones-Ahmadinejad is sloganeering again, more propaganda.

"[E]qual protection rights for same-sex couples".

Translation: a whole new regime of civil rights protections premised on sexual behavior, asserted more than two-hundred years after the ratification of the Constitution and imposed by the government against the free exercise of fundamental rights, especially the natural, inalienable rights associated with private property, parental consent and authority, and free association as far as the eye can see.

"[P]rivacy rights concerning procreation".

Translation: abortion on demand, including live-birth abortions, i.e., the murder of human beings hiding behind the legalese of Roe v. Wade, "discovered" nearly two-hundred years after the ratification of the Constitution; the so-called war on women, that is, the audacity of those who would object to being compelled by the government to pay for lefty's sexual exploits and abortions—his privacy made public, his selfish wants repackaged as rights and entitlements.

These are the things that are alleged to be offensive to the Constitution. Know that in every instance when lefty the statist bootlick talks about "constitutional rights" he will in actuality be talking about recent or non-existent civil rights "protections" imposed collectively by the state at the expense of fundamental rights, at the expense of the lives and liberties of others.

More deflection. More distractions.

________________________________________

In the meantime. . . .

The thrust of the thread as tendered by PoliticalChick, as well as the essence of the Forbes article, once again, is this:

PoliticalChick's dispute with Posner goes to his sentiments as they correspond with those expressed by certain members of Obama's Administration, his associates, persons who are clearly not big fans of unbridled free speech, particularly when it comes to the expression of ideas with which they disagree. That coupled with Obama's womanish, overly sensitive concerns for the feelings of barbarians, PoliticalChick suggests that we have good reason to be suspicious of the sincerity of Obama's declarations of allegiance to First Amendment liberties. —M.D. Rawlings​

 

[PoliticalChic]

Yeah, right. M. D., you certainly are not a classical liberal. Ans since you redefine as you continue, you can claim to be Bugs Bunny.

LOL! A libertarian, like the American conservative, is a person who embraces the classical liberalism of the Anglo-American tradition, ya damn fool!

Have you seen this?

1. There is no shortage of hypotheses about what the tea party movement is. Some embrace it as a revival of traditional conservatism. Many insist it is ginned up by billionaire funders as a means to fight regulations. Others view it as arch-social conservative Republicans, motivated by divisive issues like abortion, gay rights or even racial angst.

2. But all these explanations are missing much of the story. Libertarian attitudes are fueling roughly half the tea party activists, according to our new Cato Institute survey. These libertarian tea partiers believe “the less government the better” and don’t see a role for government in promoting “traditional values.” This is a big reason why the movement has largely focused on economic matters, resisting attempts to add social issues to its agenda.

3. Today, libertarians and conservatives are united in their anger -- 79 percent of tea party libertarians are angry about Washington, compared to 74 percent of tea party conservatives. Libertarians may again have led the way. Opinion: Tea party's other half - David Kirby and Emily Ekins - POLITICO.com

 

[JakeStarkey]

M.D. and PC simply redefine terms and narratives they don't like.

That is why everybody but the far right and the libertarians laugh at them.

The whole world is out of step but them.

 

[PoliticalChic]

M.D. and PC simply redefine terms and narratives they don't like.

That is why everybody but the far right and the libertarians laugh at them.

The whole world is out of step but them.

And yet, strangely, you are unable to find any error....

I see only two possibilities:

Either you are obtunded, or

....we are correct in our theses.....


Wait...a third possibility reveals itself: both of the above.


And, you get to post without the added burden of having to remain within the parameters of truth!

 

[daveman]

M.D. and PC simply redefine terms and narratives they don't like.

That is why everybody but the far right and the libertarians laugh at them.

The whole world is out of step but them.

Redefining words is the sole province of the left, Fakey.


Exactly as you're doing here, because you don't like what M.D. and PC have to say.

 

[JakeStarkey]

Quit daving for heaven's sake. Now you are engaging in redefining reality. No one who counts really cares what you think.

 

[PoliticalChic]

Quit daving for heaven's sake. Now you are engaging in redefining reality. No one who counts really cares what you think.

"No one who counts really cares what you think."

Really?
Did you interview every one?

Or is this "reporting" on the level of elementary-school gossip: "Everyone hates you"?

And....elementary school would be the operative term here.

 

[JakeStarkey]

You are engaged in davying, PoliticalChick. You think that you can "change that" by changing the narrative by changing terms and logical explanations. You are fail and you will continue to be p'wned.

It is what it is.

 

[rightwinger]

Quit daving for heaven's sake. Now you are engaging in redefining reality. No one who counts really cares what you think.

"No one who counts really cares what you think."

Really?
Did you interview every one?

Or is this "reporting" on the level of elementary-school gossip: "Everyone hates you"?

And....elementary school would be the operative term here.

We forgot daveman was your toadie

 

[PoliticalChic]

You are engaged in davying, PoliticalChick. You think that you can "change that" by changing the narrative by changing terms and logical explanations. You are fail and you will continue to be p'wned.

It is what it is.

Show mistakes in my posts, or you are simply a liar.

 

[PoliticalChic]

Quit daving for heaven's sake. Now you are engaging in redefining reality. No one who counts really cares what you think.

"No one who counts really cares what you think."

Really?
Did you interview every one?

Or is this "reporting" on the level of elementary-school gossip: "Everyone hates you"?

And....elementary school would be the operative term here.

We forgot daveman was your toadie

"We"....you and your tapeworm?


Don't you realize that it is transparent that you've lost the argument...and know you've lost it....when the only comment you are able to post are about the person, rather than the subject?

I guess it's true about your learning new tricks, huh?

 

[JakeStarkey]

Says the writer will personally attack anyone as casually as she says "hi".

Tis what tis. She has fail by her own words. But then again she can "change that".

 

[rightwinger]

"No one who counts really cares what you think."

Really?
Did you interview every one?

Or is this "reporting" on the level of elementary-school gossip: "Everyone hates you"?

And....elementary school would be the operative term here.

We forgot daveman was your toadie

"We"....you and your tapeworm?


Don't you realize that it is transparent that you've lost the argument...and know you've lost it....when the only comment you are able to post are about the person, rather than the subject?

I guess it's true about your learning new tricks, huh?

Guess what? daveman is still daveman

When he says " Political Chic is right, she really knows what she is talking about" it is coming from daveman

One of the few remaining on the board who actually buys into your line of shit

 

[daveman]

Quit daving for heaven's sake. Now you are engaging in redefining reality. No one who counts really cares what you think.

You mean you and your fellow leftists.

 

[daveman]

Quit daving for heaven's sake. Now you are engaging in redefining reality. No one who counts really cares what you think.

"No one who counts really cares what you think."

Really?
Did you interview every one?

Or is this "reporting" on the level of elementary-school gossip: "Everyone hates you"?

And....elementary school would be the operative term here.

We forgot daveman was your toadie

Oh, look: A leftist coming to Fakey's defense.

In other words, just like always.

 

[daveman]

We forgot daveman was your toadie

"We"....you and your tapeworm?


Don't you realize that it is transparent that you've lost the argument...and know you've lost it....when the only comment you are able to post are about the person, rather than the subject?

I guess it's true about your learning new tricks, huh?

Guess what? daveman is still daveman

When he says " Political Chic is right, she really knows what she is talking about" it is coming from daveman

One of the few remaining on the board who actually buys into your line of shit

What is it with you drooling idiot leftists and your claims to speak for everyone?

You can't form a coherent thought of your own. And you expect us to believe you're the official spokesmoonbat?

 

[PoliticalChic]

We forgot daveman was your toadie

"We"....you and your tapeworm?


Don't you realize that it is transparent that you've lost the argument...and know you've lost it....when the only comment you are able to post are about the person, rather than the subject?

I guess it's true about your learning new tricks, huh?

Guess what? daveman is still daveman

When he says " Political Chic is right, she really knows what she is talking about" it is coming from daveman

One of the few remaining on the board who actually buys into your line of shit

Got to you again, didn't I.

It's the language...it's a give-away.


Since I know the subject and the analysis so much better than you, it's all you've got.

 

[PoliticalChic]

Says the writer will personally attack anyone as casually as she says "hi".

Tis what tis. She has fail by her own words. But then again she can "change that".

First thing I do every morn, is brush my teeth and sharpen my tongue.
Beware.


What's great is that when ever one of you Lefties can't rebut my posts, you scream 'fail.'

It's one of those "tells," but a little more subtle than a white flag.