End The First Amendment???

[del]

Political Chic is not interested in fairness or objectivity in discussion.

She is a political ethug who wishes to end free speech on the Board through misrepresentation and intimidation.

She forgot that we just laugh at her when she starts this nonsense.

"We" being, of course, Fakey and his fellow leftists.

no, pretty much everyone laughs at her

and you

am i laughing?

 

[Sallow]

Obviously PC..you were making chocolate chip cookies when Obama was speaking to the UN on the topic..or you'd know that he vehmently defended the first amendment.

 

[C_Clayton_Jones]

Obviously PC..you were making chocolate chip cookies when Obama was speaking to the UN on the topic..or you'd know that he vehmently defended the first amendment.

…or stuffing the cookie dough in her ears.

 

[daveman]

Political Chic is not interested in fairness or objectivity in discussion.

She is a political ethug who wishes to end free speech on the Board through misrepresentation and intimidation.

She forgot that we just laugh at her when she starts this nonsense.

"We" being, of course, Fakey and his fellow leftists.

no, pretty much everyone laughs at her

and you

am i laughing?

Dunno. Are you looking in a mirror?

 

[del]

"We" being, of course, Fakey and his fellow leftists.

no, pretty much everyone laughs at her

and you

am i laughing?

Dunno. Are you looking in a mirror?

good one, dave.

are you and political chunk sharing a writer?

 

[Luddly Neddite]

What an idiotic premise.

 

[whitehall]

The radical left sees the Constitution written in a lump of clay rather than etched in stone. The funny thing is that generations of kids have been taught that the 1st Amendment only applies to the rabble who burn the Flag in the streets and shit on the Virgin Mary. They are shocked that the Bill of Rights also applies to Americans who call them dumb asses. The ironically named "fairness doctrine" aka "hush Rush" bill is intended to silence opposition speech.

 

[JakeStarkey]

Our little board loons keep on daving.

Political Chic is not interested in fairness or objectivity in discussion.

She is a political ethug who wishes to end free speech on the Board through misrepresentation and intimidation.

She forgot that we just laugh at her when she starts this nonsense.

"We" being, of course, Fakey and his fellow leftists.

 

[idb]

Obama's claim of being a Constitutional scholar strains credibility.

Maybe someday he'll read the document he swore to protect and defend.

Quite right.
When, oh when, are the Supreme Court going to pull him into line?

 

[PoliticalChic]

When this way-Left President, with inordinate sensitivities when it comes to Islam, suggests he will be more 'flexible' after his re-election.....

....the following is exactly what he means.

1. "The World Doesn’t Love the First Amendment

2. The vile anti-Muslim video shows that the U.S. overvalues free speech.



3. In a world linked by YouTube, Twitter, and Facebook, countless videos attacking people’s religions, produced by provocateurs, rabble-rousers, and lunatics, will spread to every corner of the world, as fast as the Internet can blast them, and beyond the power of governments to stop them.

4. But there is another possible response. This is that Americans need to learn that the rest of the world—and not just Muslims—see no sense in the First Amendment. Even other Western nations take a more circumspect position on freedom of expression than we do, realizing that often free speech must yield to other values and the need for order.





5. The First Amendment earned its sacred status only in the 1960s, and then only among liberals and the left, who cheered when the courts ruled that government could not suppress the speech of dissenters, critics, scandalous artistic types, and even pornographers.

6. ...conservatives have invoked the First Amendment to oppose efforts to make everyone, in universities and elsewhere, speak “civilly” about women and minorities. I’m talking of course about the “political correctness” movement beginning in the 1980s, which often merged into attempts to enforce a leftist position on race relations and gender politics.




7. For the left, the amendment today is like a dear old uncle who enacted heroic deeds in his youth but on occasion says embarrassing things about taboo subjects in his decline.

8. We have to remember that our First Amendment values are not universal...

9. Americans have not always been so paralyzed by constitutional symbolism.

10. Try explaining that to the protesters in Cairo or Islamabad."
The vile anti-Muslim video and the First Amendment: Does the U.S. overvalue free speech? - Slate Magazine


Read between the lines......

....Slate magazine.....

....the Left has decided it's time to end free speech....
.... coincidentally, the White House wants to control the internet.


Are you Liberals ready to go along with that?

Did you bother to read – and comprehend – the actual article before butchering it like the partisan hack you are?

The author in no way advocates ‘ending the First Amendment,’ and neither do ‘liberals.’

Of course I read it, torte-boy...

...but only one of us understood it.

Hint:you weren't the one who did so.


Bet you didn't understand Marc Antony's speech, either.

Friends, Romans, countrymen, lend me your ears;
I come to bury Caesar, not to praise him.



Really think the Libs want to 'bury' the idea of restricting free speech?
Read between the lines....the ones that I provided for you!

The same way Liberals/Progressives wanted to end the Fairness Doctrine.

Dim-Wit.

You and Jakey are the reasons the Left gets anti-American ideas into the culture.
You are the Fifth Column.

Lock-Step Liberals will be the death of America.

 

[PoliticalChic]

Obviously PC..you were making chocolate chip cookies when Obama was speaking to the UN on the topic..or you'd know that he vehmently defended the first amendment.

They don't come any more stupid than you.

That's why the liar-in-chief is still suggesting censorship and blaming the a video for the damage caused by his policies.

And you buy it like it was on sale.



No chocolate chip cookies for you.

 

[idb]

When this way-Left President, with inordinate sensitivities when it comes to Islam, suggests he will be more 'flexible' after his re-election.....

....the following is exactly what he means.

1. "The World Doesn’t Love the First Amendment

2. The vile anti-Muslim video shows that the U.S. overvalues free speech.



3. In a world linked by YouTube, Twitter, and Facebook, countless videos attacking people’s religions, produced by provocateurs, rabble-rousers, and lunatics, will spread to every corner of the world, as fast as the Internet can blast them, and beyond the power of governments to stop them.

4. But there is another possible response. This is that Americans need to learn that the rest of the world—and not just Muslims—see no sense in the First Amendment. Even other Western nations take a more circumspect position on freedom of expression than we do, realizing that often free speech must yield to other values and the need for order.





5. The First Amendment earned its sacred status only in the 1960s, and then only among liberals and the left, who cheered when the courts ruled that government could not suppress the speech of dissenters, critics, scandalous artistic types, and even pornographers.

6. ...conservatives have invoked the First Amendment to oppose efforts to make everyone, in universities and elsewhere, speak “civilly” about women and minorities. I’m talking of course about the “political correctness” movement beginning in the 1980s, which often merged into attempts to enforce a leftist position on race relations and gender politics.




7. For the left, the amendment today is like a dear old uncle who enacted heroic deeds in his youth but on occasion says embarrassing things about taboo subjects in his decline.

8. We have to remember that our First Amendment values are not universal...

9. Americans have not always been so paralyzed by constitutional symbolism.

10. Try explaining that to the protesters in Cairo or Islamabad."
The vile anti-Muslim video and the First Amendment: Does the U.S. overvalue free speech? - Slate Magazine


Read between the lines......

....Slate magazine.....

....the Left has decided it's time to end free speech....
.... coincidentally, the White House wants to control the internet.


Are you Liberals ready to go along with that?

Did you bother to read – and comprehend – the actual article before butchering it like the partisan hack you are?

The author in no way advocates ‘ending the First Amendment,’ and neither do ‘liberals.’

Of course I read it, torte-boy...

...but only one of us understood it.

Hint:you weren't the one who did so.


Bet you didn't understand Marc Antony's speech, either.

Friends, Romans, countrymen, lend me your ears;
I come to bury Caesar, not to praise him.



Really think the Libs want to 'bury' the idea of restricting free speech?
Read between the lines....the ones that I provided for you!

The same way Liberals/Progressives wanted to end the Fairness Doctrine.

Dim-Wit.

You and Jakey are the reasons the Left gets anti-American ideas into the culture.
You are the Fifth Column.

Lock-Step Liberals will be the death of America.

But, have you forgotten Richard The Third's famous speech?

 

[PoliticalChic]

Did you bother to read – and comprehend – the actual article before butchering it like the partisan hack you are?

The author in no way advocates ‘ending the First Amendment,’ and neither do ‘liberals.’

Of course I read it, torte-boy...

...but only one of us understood it.

Hint:you weren't the one who did so.


Bet you didn't understand Marc Antony's speech, either.

Friends, Romans, countrymen, lend me your ears;
I come to bury Caesar, not to praise him.



Really think the Libs want to 'bury' the idea of restricting free speech?
Read between the lines....the ones that I provided for you!

The same way Liberals/Progressives wanted to end the Fairness Doctrine.

Dim-Wit.

You and Jakey are the reasons the Left gets anti-American ideas into the culture.
You are the Fifth Column.

Lock-Step Liberals will be the death of America.

But, have you forgotten Richard The Third's famous speech?

Willie didn't forget you, BVD's...

"Thou errant scurvy-valiant blind-worm!"

 

[idb]

Of course I read it, torte-boy...

...but only one of us understood it.

Hint:you weren't the one who did so.


Bet you didn't understand Marc Antony's speech, either.

Friends, Romans, countrymen, lend me your ears;
I come to bury Caesar, not to praise him.



Really think the Libs want to 'bury' the idea of restricting free speech?
Read between the lines....the ones that I provided for you!

The same way Liberals/Progressives wanted to end the Fairness Doctrine.

Dim-Wit.

You and Jakey are the reasons the Left gets anti-American ideas into the culture.
You are the Fifth Column.

Lock-Step Liberals will be the death of America.

But, have you forgotten Richard The Third's famous speech?

Willie didn't forget you, BVD's...

"Thou errant scurvy-valiant blind-worm!"

I was actually thinking of "A horse, a horse...", but yours is equally pointless to the thread.

 

[High_Gravity]

In Islamic countries free speach is an alien concept, it just doesn't exist. You are not free to say what you want in those countries, talking bad about a countries leader or dictator would get you picked up by the secret police, nevermind if you talked bad about Islam. Just the idea that someone would mock Islam and talk bad about it is just not fathomable to them and of course they want to end it.

 

[PoliticalChic]

In Islamic countries free speach is an alien concept, it just doesn't exist. You are not free to say what you want in those countries, talking bad about a countries leader or dictator would get you picked up by the secret police, nevermind if you talked bad about Islam. Just the idea that someone would mock Islam and talk bad about it is just not fathomable to them and of course they want to end it.

Islamic countries???


Check this out in NYC yesterday....


[ame=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ABfcjn_npb8&feature=player_embedded]Spray Paint Jihaad! - Arrest New York Subway - 25 Sep 2012 - YouTube[/ame]

 

[PoliticalChic]

But, have you forgotten Richard The Third's famous speech?

Willie didn't forget you, BVD's...

"Thou errant scurvy-valiant blind-worm!"

I was actually thinking of "A horse, a horse...", but yours is equally pointless to the thread.

Pointless?


Shoe fit, B's?

 

[High_Gravity]

In Islamic countries free speach is an alien concept, it just doesn't exist. You are not free to say what you want in those countries, talking bad about a countries leader or dictator would get you picked up by the secret police, nevermind if you talked bad about Islam. Just the idea that someone would mock Islam and talk bad about it is just not fathomable to them and of course they want to end it.

Islamic countries???


Check this out in NYC yesterday....


[ame=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ABfcjn_npb8&feature=player_embedded]Spray Paint Jihaad! - Arrest New York Subway - 25 Sep 2012 - YouTube[/ame]

New York has so many Muslims, it could be a Muslim country.

 

[idb]

Willie didn't forget you, BVD's...

"Thou errant scurvy-valiant blind-worm!"

I was actually thinking of "A horse, a horse...", but yours is equally pointless to the thread.

Pointless?


Shoe fit, B's?

Exactly
Much like;

Friends, Romans, countrymen, lend me your ears;
I come to bury Caesar, not to praise him.

 

[Wry Catcher]

When this way-Left President, with inordinate sensitivities when it comes to Islam, suggests he will be more 'flexible' after his re-election.....

....the following is exactly what he means.

1. "The World Doesn’t Love the First Amendment

2. The vile anti-Muslim video shows that the U.S. overvalues free speech.

In what reality do you live? Do you thin ... err, believe starting a thread, "When this way-left President" gives you credibility? You may get high fives from others on the idiot fringe but no one sees Obama as "way-Left" but for the aforementioned idiot fringe.



3. In a world linked by YouTube, Twitter, and Facebook, countless videos attacking people’s religions, produced by provocateurs, rabble-rousers, and lunatics, will spread to every corner of the world, as fast as the Internet can blast them, and beyond the power of governments to stop them.

Well, one truth for once - is this a slip into sanity?

4. But there is another possible response. This is that Americans need to learn that the rest of the world—and not just Muslims—see no sense in the First Amendment. Even other Western nations take a more circumspect position on freedom of expression than we do, realizing that often free speech must yield to other values and the need for order.

Aware Americans understand this; yet some still hope to abrdige the freedom of speech and expression and even want to amend the Constitution allowing the Congress to do so (e.g. Flag Burning)





5. The First Amendment earned its sacred status only in the 1960s, and then only among liberals and the left, who cheered when the courts ruled that government could not suppress the speech of dissenters, critics, scandalous artistic types, and even pornographers.

I'm I infering correctly that you would choose to allow government to abridge the speech of "dissenters, critics, scandalous artistic types and pronographers"?



6. ...conservatives have invoked the First Amendment to oppose efforts to make everyone, in universities and elsewhere, speak “civilly” about women and minorities. I’m talking of course about the “political correctness” movement beginning in the 1980s, which often merged into attempts to enforce a leftist position on race relations and gender politics.

It seems you've missed that memo on civility. Please explain the difference betwen a "leftist position on race relations and gender politics" and your (i.e. a 'rightest' position)




7. For the left, the amendment today is like a dear old uncle who enacted heroic deeds in his youth but on occasion says embarrassing things about taboo subjects in his decline.

8. We have to remember that our First Amendment values are not universal...

9. Americans have not always been so paralyzed by constitutional symbolism.

I don't feel paralyzed, I find the symbolism in our Constitution to be enabling

10. Try explaining that to the protesters in Cairo or Islamabad."
The vile anti-Muslim video and the First Amendment: Does the U.S. overvalue free speech? - Slate Magazine


Read between the lines......

....Slate magazine.....

....the Left has decided it's time to end free speech....
.... coincidentally, the White House wants to control the internet.

A lie, a half-truth or an effort to start a rumor? Without evidence of such I must conclude a lie.


Are you Liberals ready to go along with that?

I'm willing to abridge your 'speech' (I have).