M14 Shooter
The Light of Truth
So?I didn't see anything in Elon's Twitter releases that confirms that.
You asked who broke what law.
You have an answer.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
So?I didn't see anything in Elon's Twitter releases that confirms that.
Indeed I do. "Twittergate" is a dud.So?
You asked who broke what law.
You have an answer.
You only think so because it makes Democrats look bad."Twittergate" is a dud.
wow...I am not surprised to hear a Demafascist saying thisIndeed I do. "Twittergate" is a dud.
Thanks for participating.
Yet no crime...and why doesn't it make Repubs look bad if it makes Dems look bad...which is debatable.You only think so because it makes Democrats look bad.
So what was the crime?wow...I am not surprised to hear a Demafascist saying this
You only think so because it makes Democrats look bad.
Deliberately obtuse much?Yet no crime...
And they will contune to use such toools as often as possible.They LOVED it when it was a tool for shutting us up.
who claimed anything criminal happened? Twittergate has to do with the violation of folks consitutional rights. I would have to know more, to conclude if a criminal act took place, I'd have to see if the Xiden campaign was directly involved in the censorship...if so one could argue there was campaign contribution crimes....So what was the crime?
Deliberately obtuse much?
The Democrats pressured Twitter to cover up the Hunter Biden issue so as to influence the 2020 election.
Twitter, full of liberals, happily did so.
Many have claimed a crime occurred.Did anyone claim there was a crime here?
No?
So why does "no crime" matter?
Well the issue is that it was against TOS to discuss thing that were harmful to the Xiden campaign, and they apparently did that at the direction of folks at the FBI.Pressure? In what way? By simply requesting a post, that clearly violated TOS, be taken down?
What about this?
View attachment 734966
Ok. So?
Many have claimed a crime occurred.
Even the title of this thread says a law was broke.
And thus, more proof is is impossible to shame a Democrat for stifling free speech, because to them,the ends justify the means.Pressure? In what way? By simply requesting a post, that clearly violated TOS, be taken down?
What about this?
Ok. So?
Many have claimed a crime occurred.
Even the title of this thread says a law was broke.
Well the issue is that it was against TOS to discuss thing that were harmful to the Xiden campaign,
1. The FBI asking a media outlet not print something is perfectly legal.and they apparently did that at the direction of folks at the FBI.
Free speech wasn't stifled.And thus, more proof is is impossible to shame a Democrat for stifling free speech, because to them,the ends justify the means.
what dick pics? The NY Post articles didn't have dick pics in them.No it's not. Dick pics violate terms of service but even if it didn't, simply asking is not a crime.
1. The FBI asking a media outlet not print something is perfectly legal.
2. The FBI has done this for decades...of course it was newspapers, magazines and tv news, but still not unusual.
3. How did Biden have the FBI do anything? Trump was president during the Biden campaign.
Actually if Twitter decided what to publish on it's website, it could be sued...Free speech wasn't stifled.
Twitter was well within their 1st amendment rights to print or not print anything they wanted.
Unless the Trump administration tried to force Twitter to remove material, it was perfectly within his right to simply ask.
Certainly, private citizen Biden could ask the same of Twitter. Right?
Asking Twitter to not post something is not a crime, regardless of who makes the request and what the material is.what dick pics? The NY Post articles didn't have dick pics in them.
Yeah....maybe with things of national security....not with a story that harms a political campaign. I don't know if Xiden was directly involved or not, we'd need more information....
Musk is just balancing the leftwing "hate speech, misinformation, and lies".The problem is he hasn’t enraged the right as well – conservatives who condone the spread of rightwing hate speech, misinformation, and lies.
Actually if Twitter decided what to publish on it's website, it could be sued...
No, that doesn't violate any laws. If so, list the law being broken.No, private citizen Biden was subject to campaign fin laws at the time, if he asked Twitter and they in fact provided him with a campaign contribution he could of potentially violated the law by accepting it.