Liberals don't have a problem with business owner/managers making more than labour, what they have a problem with is business owners and managers taking a larger and larger chunk of the income, while their workers get less and less while being more productive.
You are not a "liberal." I am a liberal. You are a leftist, a Communist.
Franco hater dupe is an artificial stupidity routine run off of a virus infected porn server.
Let's make this very simple for you.
Mary owns a pizza parlour. At night she and her helper Juan make pizza dough by pouring 50 pound bags of flour into a big vat an mixing in yeast and water with a wooden paddle. Juan is paid $8.25 to stir with the spoon. She makes good pizza and sells all she is able to make, which isn't much because it's hard making the dough.
Mary is smart and grasps that mixing dough by hand is not efficient. So she goes to the bank to get a loan for an industrial mixer. The bank tells her that she must secure the loan, so she puts up her car as collateral (risk.) She buys the mixer and can now make 10 times as much dough. She and Juan do far less physical work at night. Her cash flow from operations increases.
NOW, according to the diseased minds of Communists, Mary is ripping Juan off. Because Juan should get a big raise. Why? Well Juan is doing less work, so that should get him a raise, right?
Juan took zero risk in providing capital improvements, so that should get him a raise, right?
No, to the worm infested mind of the Communist, Juan should get 10 times his wage because Mary was smart enough to improve the process, and well she owes him because, uh, BOOOSHHHH.
If a business owner is now making double what he did 10 years ago, then his workers should be too.
Worm infested brain. Why should the workers make double? What did they do to increase the equity and profitably of the company?
He doesn't get to keep ALL of the increased revenue. Some of it needs to go to the people who made it possible for him.
How did they make it possible?
How did Juan make it possible for Mary to buy a mixer?
The answer, you have a worm infested brain.
Nobody here is a communist, or anything close to it. If the top 10% have all of the wealth, and the bottom 47% are living paycheck to paycheck, they're not going to be buying houses, cars, furniture, or other durable goods as frequently as they did when they had savings, home equity, and other financial resources to fall back on in hard times.
Of course you're not a Communist, you just demand that each provide according to his ability and receive according to his need. Of course the state will need to own all the assets to keep things fair - but you're sure not a Communist..
In the Reagan years, food stamp usage doubled, and conservatives didn't blame Reagan for it. They blamed the "welfare queens", the lazy, inner city welfare recipients, the poor. The spending spree that the US went on when Reagan was in power, was fueled by debt. Deficits were a good thing. Everybody was flashing VISA, AMEX, and Mastercard, and credit cards were lavish in raising limits. It sucked all of the savings and equity that the bottom 25% had accumulated. With wages flatlining, and the buying power of those wages declining year by year, those just starting to climb the economic ladder were stuck where they were.
Assumes facts not in reality.
Provide evidence that "food stamps doubled per capita under Reagan."
After the lower 25% were sucked dry, the Middle Class were next to feel that sucking feeling on their piggy banks. This would have happened before Obama came into power if not for the Clinton Administration. Clinton did get the minimum wage increased, and he increased taxes, and low and behold, unemployment went DOWN, and wages started to rise, but then Bush came into power and we were back to cut and spend, again, and the economy went into the toilet in the exact same way that it did when Reagan was in power.
Unemployment went down under Clinton when NEWT forced a TAX CUT through. Unemployment spiked in 1996 when the Clinton increased MW. However the economy was strong so the rate bounced back fairly quickly.
Conservatives still refuse to accept that unemployment is way down under Obama,
That's because of reality, something you Communist prefer not to deal with. UE percentage is irrelevant if the labor force shrinks by a quarter. The labor participation rate today is the lowest since the great depression.
that the job losses they assured us would happen because of Obamacare, didn't happen. What is down is the number of government workers. Obama has actually shrunk government.
Obama has shrunk government and the sun is made of marshmallows and cheese whiz.
This is why intelligent people generally ignore you. If I want someone to lie to me, I'll converse with the Franco hater dupe bot.
Conservatives, who keep talking about not growing government should be impressed but they're not. Just like they're not impressed the employment rate is down. They're also not impressed that the Dow Jones average has gone from 10,000 when Bush left office, to 16,000 under Obama. Conservatives predicted gas would cost over $10 a gallon under Obama, but it's nearly 33% lower now than it was when Bush left office.
Despite all creditable evidence to the contrary, conservatives continue to believe that:
1. Tax cuts create jobs. What created jobs under Ronald Reagan was his military spending, all of which was financed by deficit spending. When the unemployment rate went up, Reagan hired 1 million government workers. When criticized for this, Reagan said that government workers buy goods and services too, and that this would spur employment. He was right in that, but this move too was funded by deficit spending.
2. Immigrants/the poor/social programs are bleeding the country white. Ignoring the spending of the military, the amount spent on maintaining US military bases around the world, is to be wilfully blind to the extent that US corporate interests abroad are financed by US miliary treaties and servicemen and women protecting those interest, all of which is paid for by the American taxpayer.
3. Illegal immigrants are the problem. The problem is not illegal immigration, its that Americans are more than happy to employ migrants because they work for less money than Americans. The cheap food that Americans enjoy is brought to you by the low wages paid to migrant field workers. Americans don't care as long as they get cheap stuff.
Too many lies in you talking points to bother with.
Let's start with the Pizza Parlour example I gave you.