Navigation
Install the app
How to install the app on iOS
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
More options
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
Electoral College Breakdown
- Thread starter JoeB131
- Start date
- Status
- Not open for further replies.
- Aug 4, 2009
- 281,171
- 140,756
- 2,615
The question was....RecoveryDropped from 10 percent down below 5 percentHow is tripling the stock market and dropping unemployment by over five percent “weak”??Ain’t no slow recovery ...is it?Slowest recovery that tripled the Stock Market and cut unemployment by five percent.What flaw in the system?
If there was a flaw it was the BULLSHIT MSM POLLS.
In November the UE rate won't be 10%
Actually, it will be 10% next month. And the one thing we know about the unemployment rate is that it takes a lot longer to go down than it does to go up. For instance, it went from 5% to 10% in less than a year and half, but it didn't go back down to 5% until 2015 or so.
THANK YOU! Good to see you finally acknowledging the fact failed former President Obama led the slowest recovery in modern history.
Slowest recovery that tripled the Stock Market.
8K to 20K isn't a triple.
No President has had a bigger gain
Ain’t no slow recovery ...is it?
Weakest recovery since WWII.
No President has had a bigger gain
Incorrect.
How is tripling the stock market
He didn't.
and dropping unemployment by over five percent “weak”??
Don't be mad at me for pointing out Obama's weak economic performance.
View attachment 326993
Looks like 3.1%
That is quite an economic recovery
7.8% when he took office.
Yes, quite a weak recovery.
We recovered from 10 percent unemployment
The question was....RecoveryDropped from 10 percent down below 5 percentHow is tripling the stock market and dropping unemployment by over five percent “weak”??Ain’t no slow recovery ...is it?Slowest recovery that tripled the Stock Market and cut unemployment by five percent.What flaw in the system?
If there was a flaw it was the BULLSHIT MSM POLLS.
In November the UE rate won't be 10%
Actually, it will be 10% next month. And the one thing we know about the unemployment rate is that it takes a lot longer to go down than it does to go up. For instance, it went from 5% to 10% in less than a year and half, but it didn't go back down to 5% until 2015 or so.
THANK YOU! Good to see you finally acknowledging the fact failed former President Obama led the slowest recovery in modern history.
Slowest recovery that tripled the Stock Market.
8K to 20K isn't a triple.
No President has had a bigger gain
Ain’t no slow recovery ...is it?
Weakest recovery since WWII.
No President has had a bigger gain
Incorrect.
How is tripling the stock market
He didn't.
and dropping unemployment by over five percent “weak”??
Don't be mad at me for pointing out Obama's weak economic performance.
View attachment 326993
Looks like 3.1%
That is quite an economic recovery
7.8% when he took office.
Yes, quite a weak recovery.
We recovered from 10 percent unemployment
The question was....Recovery
Yeah, Obama's recovery was really weak.
- Aug 4, 2009
- 281,171
- 140,756
- 2,615
What was weak about nearly tripling the stock market, cutting the deficit in half and cutting unemployment by five percent?The question was....RecoveryDropped from 10 percent down below 5 percentHow is tripling the stock market and dropping unemployment by over five percent “weak”??Ain’t no slow recovery ...is it?Slowest recovery that tripled the Stock Market and cut unemployment by five percent.What flaw in the system?
If there was a flaw it was the BULLSHIT MSM POLLS.
In November the UE rate won't be 10%
Actually, it will be 10% next month. And the one thing we know about the unemployment rate is that it takes a lot longer to go down than it does to go up. For instance, it went from 5% to 10% in less than a year and half, but it didn't go back down to 5% until 2015 or so.
THANK YOU! Good to see you finally acknowledging the fact failed former President Obama led the slowest recovery in modern history.
Slowest recovery that tripled the Stock Market.
8K to 20K isn't a triple.
No President has had a bigger gain
Ain’t no slow recovery ...is it?
Weakest recovery since WWII.
No President has had a bigger gain
Incorrect.
How is tripling the stock market
He didn't.
and dropping unemployment by over five percent “weak”??
Don't be mad at me for pointing out Obama's weak economic performance.
View attachment 326993
Looks like 3.1%
That is quite an economic recovery
7.8% when he took office.
Yes, quite a weak recovery.
We recovered from 10 percent unemployment
The question was....Recovery
Yeah, Obama's recovery was really weak.
Repealing the 17th amendment just opens the process up to political patronage and corruption
The states would then have a voice in Washington. Unfunded mandates dumped on the states would not happen. Our founders knew what they were doing by giving the states a voice in Washington.
What was weak about nearly tripling the stock market, cutting the deficit in half and cutting unemployment by five percent?
All failed former President Barack Hussein Obama deserves credit for is whatever increase in the market occurred once it had gotten back to normal, what it was at when the meltdown happened.
Slowest recovery in modern history.
- Aug 4, 2009
- 281,171
- 140,756
- 2,615
The States have a voice in WashingtonRepealing the 17th amendment just opens the process up to political patronage and corruption
The states would then have a voice in Washington. Unfunded mandates dumped on the states would not happen. Our founders knew what they were doing by giving the states a voice in Washington.
Two Senators and their allocation of Congressmen elected by We the People.......not selected in some back room out of sight from the public
True Democracy
- Aug 4, 2009
- 281,171
- 140,756
- 2,615
You keep saying that but refuse to provide any numbersWhat was weak about nearly tripling the stock market, cutting the deficit in half and cutting unemployment by five percent?
All failed former President Barack Hussein Obama deserves credit for is whatever increase in the market occurred once it had gotten back to normal, what it was at when the meltdown happened.
Slowest recovery in modern history.
What was weak about nearly tripling the stock market, cutting the deficit in half and cutting unemployment by five percent?The question was....RecoveryDropped from 10 percent down below 5 percentHow is tripling the stock market and dropping unemployment by over five percent “weak”??Ain’t no slow recovery ...is it?Slowest recovery that tripled the Stock Market and cut unemployment by five percent.What flaw in the system?
If there was a flaw it was the BULLSHIT MSM POLLS.
In November the UE rate won't be 10%
Actually, it will be 10% next month. And the one thing we know about the unemployment rate is that it takes a lot longer to go down than it does to go up. For instance, it went from 5% to 10% in less than a year and half, but it didn't go back down to 5% until 2015 or so.
THANK YOU! Good to see you finally acknowledging the fact failed former President Obama led the slowest recovery in modern history.
Slowest recovery that tripled the Stock Market.
8K to 20K isn't a triple.
No President has had a bigger gain
Ain’t no slow recovery ...is it?
Weakest recovery since WWII.
No President has had a bigger gain
Incorrect.
How is tripling the stock market
He didn't.
and dropping unemployment by over five percent “weak”??
Don't be mad at me for pointing out Obama's weak economic performance.
View attachment 326993
Looks like 3.1%
That is quite an economic recovery
7.8% when he took office.
Yes, quite a weak recovery.
We recovered from 10 percent unemployment
The question was....Recovery
Yeah, Obama's recovery was really weak.
What was weak about nearly tripling the stock market
The market (S&P 500) was up from 805 on the day he took office to 2139 on election day.
Up about 166%. And as you know, the stock market isn't the economy.
and cutting unemployment by five percent?
You don't want to look at the number in Jan 2009?
If you look at his peak, 10% in October 2009, it took until November 2016, 85 months, to drop to 4.7%. So 5.3% drop in 85 months. But his GDP numbers sucked.
Reagan's unemployment peaked at 10.8% in November 1982 and by November 1988, it dropped to 5.3%. A 5.5% drop in 72 months. And Reagan had awesome GDP numbers.
You keep saying that but refuse to provide any numbersWhat was weak about nearly tripling the stock market, cutting the deficit in half and cutting unemployment by five percent?
All failed former President Barack Hussein Obama deserves credit for is whatever increase in the market occurred once it had gotten back to normal, what it was at when the meltdown happened.
Slowest recovery in modern history.
On almost every measure examined, the 2009-15 recovery since the recession ended in June of 2009 has been the meekest in more than 50 years.
Start with the broadest measure: growth in output. The chart with this editorial compares the Obama growth pace with that of the average recovery coming out of the last eight recessions, and with the Reagan recovery, and over the same number of months (77).
Democrats used to disparage the Reagan expansion as nothing special. Yet the growth rate over the first 25 quarters under Reagan was 34%, vs. 14.3% under Obama.
How much does this matter? If we had grown at an average pace, GDP in 2015 would have been about $1.8 trillion higher. Under the Reagan recovery, growth would have been $2.7 trillion higher.
It is certainly true that every recession is different in cause and consequences, so the JEC dug deeper into the numbers. It examined GDP growth on a per capita basis.
The Reagan recovery was abnormally strong in part because it happened as millions of baby boomers were swept into the workforce, adding to growth.
But even on a per capita basis, real GDP has grown only 9% vs. 18.8% for the average recovery. That is the lowest of any post-1960 recovery. The growth decline in this key gauge of living standards is alarming.
Sorry, This Is Still The Worst Economic Recovery Ever
Growth: The president keeps congratulating himself on how the economy's doing, and Hillary Clinton just gave her former boss an 'A' for his handling of the nation's finances. Who said... Read More
www.investors.com
- Aug 4, 2009
- 281,171
- 140,756
- 2,615
You don’t understand the term recovery do you?What was weak about nearly tripling the stock market, cutting the deficit in half and cutting unemployment by five percent?The question was....RecoveryDropped from 10 percent down below 5 percentHow is tripling the stock market and dropping unemployment by over five percent “weak”??Ain’t no slow recovery ...is it?Slowest recovery that tripled the Stock Market and cut unemployment by five percent.What flaw in the system?
If there was a flaw it was the BULLSHIT MSM POLLS.
In November the UE rate won't be 10%
Actually, it will be 10% next month. And the one thing we know about the unemployment rate is that it takes a lot longer to go down than it does to go up. For instance, it went from 5% to 10% in less than a year and half, but it didn't go back down to 5% until 2015 or so.
THANK YOU! Good to see you finally acknowledging the fact failed former President Obama led the slowest recovery in modern history.
Slowest recovery that tripled the Stock Market.
8K to 20K isn't a triple.
No President has had a bigger gain
Ain’t no slow recovery ...is it?
Weakest recovery since WWII.
No President has had a bigger gain
Incorrect.
How is tripling the stock market
He didn't.
and dropping unemployment by over five percent “weak”??
Don't be mad at me for pointing out Obama's weak economic performance.
View attachment 326993
Looks like 3.1%
That is quite an economic recovery
7.8% when he took office.
Yes, quite a weak recovery.
We recovered from 10 percent unemployment
The question was....Recovery
Yeah, Obama's recovery was really weak.
What was weak about nearly tripling the stock market
The market (S&P 500) was up from 805 on the day he took office to 2139 on election day.
Up about 166%. And as you know, the stock market isn't the economy.
and cutting unemployment by five percent?
You don't want to look at the number in Jan 2009?
If you look at his peak, 10% in October 2009, it took until November 2016, 85 months, to drop to 4.7%. So 5.3% drop in 85 months. But his GDP numbers sucked.
Reagan's unemployment peaked at 10.8% in November 1982 and by November 1988, it dropped to 5.3%. A 5.5% drop in 72 months. And Reagan had awesome GDP numbers.
The stock markets is part of any recovery and an indicator of a growing economy.
A five percent drop in unemployment is prestigious no matter how you measure it.
- Aug 4, 2009
- 281,171
- 140,756
- 2,615
Apples and orangesYou keep saying that but refuse to provide any numbersWhat was weak about nearly tripling the stock market, cutting the deficit in half and cutting unemployment by five percent?
All failed former President Barack Hussein Obama deserves credit for is whatever increase in the market occurred once it had gotten back to normal, what it was at when the meltdown happened.
Slowest recovery in modern history.
On almost every measure examined, the 2009-15 recovery since the recession ended in June of 2009 has been the meekest in more than 50 years.
Start with the broadest measure: growth in output. The chart with this editorial compares the Obama growth pace with that of the average recovery coming out of the last eight recessions, and with the Reagan recovery, and over the same number of months (77).
Democrats used to disparage the Reagan expansion as nothing special. Yet the growth rate over the first 25 quarters under Reagan was 34%, vs. 14.3% under Obama.
How much does this matter? If we had grown at an average pace, GDP in 2015 would have been about $1.8 trillion higher. Under the Reagan recovery, growth would have been $2.7 trillion higher.
It is certainly true that every recession is different in cause and consequences, so the JEC dug deeper into the numbers. It examined GDP growth on a per capita basis.
The Reagan recovery was abnormally strong in part because it happened as millions of baby boomers were swept into the workforce, adding to growth.
But even on a per capita basis, real GDP has grown only 9% vs. 18.8% for the average recovery. That is the lowest of any post-1960 recovery. The growth decline in this key gauge of living standards is alarming.
Sorry, This Is Still The Worst Economic Recovery Ever
Growth: The president keeps congratulating himself on how the economy's doing, and Hillary Clinton just gave her former boss an 'A' for his handling of the nation's finances. Who said... Read More
It was a different global economy
You don’t understand the term recovery do you?What was weak about nearly tripling the stock market, cutting the deficit in half and cutting unemployment by five percent?The question was....RecoveryDropped from 10 percent down below 5 percentHow is tripling the stock market and dropping unemployment by over five percent “weak”??Ain’t no slow recovery ...is it?Slowest recovery that tripled the Stock Market and cut unemployment by five percent.What flaw in the system?
If there was a flaw it was the BULLSHIT MSM POLLS.
In November the UE rate won't be 10%
Actually, it will be 10% next month. And the one thing we know about the unemployment rate is that it takes a lot longer to go down than it does to go up. For instance, it went from 5% to 10% in less than a year and half, but it didn't go back down to 5% until 2015 or so.
THANK YOU! Good to see you finally acknowledging the fact failed former President Obama led the slowest recovery in modern history.
Slowest recovery that tripled the Stock Market.
8K to 20K isn't a triple.
No President has had a bigger gain
Ain’t no slow recovery ...is it?
Weakest recovery since WWII.
No President has had a bigger gain
Incorrect.
How is tripling the stock market
He didn't.
and dropping unemployment by over five percent “weak”??
Don't be mad at me for pointing out Obama's weak economic performance.
View attachment 326993
Looks like 3.1%
That is quite an economic recovery
7.8% when he took office.
Yes, quite a weak recovery.
We recovered from 10 percent unemployment
The question was....Recovery
Yeah, Obama's recovery was really weak.
What was weak about nearly tripling the stock market
The market (S&P 500) was up from 805 on the day he took office to 2139 on election day.
Up about 166%. And as you know, the stock market isn't the economy.
and cutting unemployment by five percent?
You don't want to look at the number in Jan 2009?
If you look at his peak, 10% in October 2009, it took until November 2016, 85 months, to drop to 4.7%. So 5.3% drop in 85 months. But his GDP numbers sucked.
Reagan's unemployment peaked at 10.8% in November 1982 and by November 1988, it dropped to 5.3%. A 5.5% drop in 72 months. And Reagan had awesome GDP numbers.
The stock markets is part of any recovery and an indicator of a growing economy.
A five percent drop in unemployment is prestigious no matter how you measure it.
You don’t understand the term recovery do you?
I do. Obama's was the weakest since WWII.
A five percent drop in unemployment is prestigious no matter how you measure it.
Yup. Even if you have the weakest recovery since WWII.
Apples and orangesYou keep saying that but refuse to provide any numbersWhat was weak about nearly tripling the stock market, cutting the deficit in half and cutting unemployment by five percent?
All failed former President Barack Hussein Obama deserves credit for is whatever increase in the market occurred once it had gotten back to normal, what it was at when the meltdown happened.
Slowest recovery in modern history.
On almost every measure examined, the 2009-15 recovery since the recession ended in June of 2009 has been the meekest in more than 50 years.
Start with the broadest measure: growth in output. The chart with this editorial compares the Obama growth pace with that of the average recovery coming out of the last eight recessions, and with the Reagan recovery, and over the same number of months (77).
Democrats used to disparage the Reagan expansion as nothing special. Yet the growth rate over the first 25 quarters under Reagan was 34%, vs. 14.3% under Obama.
How much does this matter? If we had grown at an average pace, GDP in 2015 would have been about $1.8 trillion higher. Under the Reagan recovery, growth would have been $2.7 trillion higher.
It is certainly true that every recession is different in cause and consequences, so the JEC dug deeper into the numbers. It examined GDP growth on a per capita basis.
The Reagan recovery was abnormally strong in part because it happened as millions of baby boomers were swept into the workforce, adding to growth.
But even on a per capita basis, real GDP has grown only 9% vs. 18.8% for the average recovery. That is the lowest of any post-1960 recovery. The growth decline in this key gauge of living standards is alarming.
Sorry, This Is Still The Worst Economic Recovery Ever
Growth: The president keeps congratulating himself on how the economy's doing, and Hillary Clinton just gave her former boss an 'A' for his handling of the nation's finances. Who said... Read More
It was a different global economy
Apples and oranges
More like apples and really weak apples.
You keep saying that but refuse to provide any numbersWhat was weak about nearly tripling the stock market, cutting the deficit in half and cutting unemployment by five percent?
All failed former President Barack Hussein Obama deserves credit for is whatever increase in the market occurred once it had gotten back to normal, what it was at when the meltdown happened.
Slowest recovery in modern history.
I've posted many indicators over the years as has many news sources but hey, here's a golden oldie.
You keep saying that but refuse to provide any numbersWhat was weak about nearly tripling the stock market, cutting the deficit in half and cutting unemployment by five percent?
All failed former President Barack Hussein Obama deserves credit for is whatever increase in the market occurred once it had gotten back to normal, what it was at when the meltdown happened.
Slowest recovery in modern history.
And, as you requested...
Why the Slow Economic Recovery?
The slow economic recovery since 2009 has not hewn closely to the patterns set by previous recoveries. One explanation that matches the key facts of this recovery-less recovery is that the fixed costs of production have risen. Higher regulation, tight credit, and other costs affect small...
www.heritage.org
- Thread starter
- #217
As you know, pretty well. Failed former President Barack Hussein Obama allowed ISIS to create a huge Caliphate in Iraq which he abandoned and Syria.
And this was our problem, why? They controlled a lot of desert, and that was about it.
Now Iran controls ALL of Syria and Iraq... how is this better?
- Thread starter
- #218
The needs of a farmer in Wyoming are very different than the needs of a banker in Los Angeles.
If every individual vote was counted correctly, we'd have a government that catered exclusively to that banker, and ignored the needs of that farmer.
As we should.
California is, in almost every way, one of the most diverse states, if not THE most diverse state, in the country. We have two of the biggest, densest cities, we have vast stretches of rural, lightly-populated farmland, and everything in between. We've got one of the most corrupt and unaccountable state government, which, for the most part, promotes its own interests rather than that of the people of this state, but to the extent that it pays attention to the needs of the people, guess which populations it pays attention to, and which populations it ignores?
They're ignoring creepy Mormon Transplants from Utah?
As you know, pretty well. Failed former President Barack Hussein Obama allowed ISIS to create a huge Caliphate in Iraq which he abandoned and Syria.
And this was our problem, why? They controlled a lot of desert, and that was about it.
Now Iran controls ALL of Syria and Iraq... how is this better?
Now Iran controls ALL of Syria and Iraq... how is this better?
Wait, Iran is bad?
How much cash did Obama send them? What a useless twat, eh?
Bob Blaylock
Diamond Member
- Banned
- #220
The needs of a farmer in Wyoming are very different than the needs of a banker in Los Angeles.
If every individual vote was countedcorrectly(Not the word I intended to use, and not a word with the correct meaning.) we'd have a government that catered exclusively to that banker, and ignored the needs of that farmer.
As we should.
The great men who founded this country disagreed, and so do I, and so, I think, would most Americans, if they really thought about it. This system of government was specifically designed to avoid the tyranny of the majority, and to assure the best chance that all Americans had their interests and needs represented in government, and not just those who could be grouped into majorities, over those who could not.
- Status
- Not open for further replies.
Similar threads
- Replies
- 12
- Views
- 838
- Replies
- 12
- Views
- 144
- Replies
- 180
- Views
- 1K
- Replies
- 36
- Views
- 335
- Replies
- 25
- Views
- 432
Latest Discussions
- Replies
- 1
- Views
- 2
- Replies
- 39
- Views
- 185
Forum List
-
-
-
-
-
Political Satire 8049
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
ObamaCare 781
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Member Usernotes 469
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-